<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple v. Moto In Germany: One iPhone Injunction Ordered, Another One Lifted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/03/419-apple-on-motorola-ip-claims-in-germany-this-old-pager-patent-is-invalid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/03/419-apple-on-motorola-ip-claims-in-germany-this-old-pager-patent-is-invalid/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiramwalker</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/03/419-apple-on-motorola-ip-claims-in-germany-this-old-pager-patent-is-invalid/#comment-87575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiramwalker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2012/02/03/419-apple-on-motorola-ip-claims-in-germany-this-old-pager-patent-is-invalid/#comment-87575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Motorola want to charge Apple more per phone, because Apple phones are more expensive. They say they want a percentage rather than a flat fee. This of course is unfair, and penalizes companies who would create more added value in their phones. A percentage enables Moto to get paid, not only for their own invention, but for Apple&#039;s inventions also. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Motorola want to charge Apple more per phone, because Apple phones are more expensive. They say they want a percentage rather than a flat fee. This of course is unfair, and penalizes companies who would create more added value in their phones. A percentage enables Moto to get paid, not only for their own invention, but for Apple&#8217;s inventions also. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imaginarynumber</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/03/419-apple-on-motorola-ip-claims-in-germany-this-old-pager-patent-is-invalid/#comment-87574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[imaginarynumber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2012/02/03/419-apple-on-motorola-ip-claims-in-germany-this-old-pager-patent-is-invalid/#comment-87574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be nice to know whether Motorola are trying to charge Apple more than they would charge anyone else or whether Apple are refusing to pay the &quot;going rate&quot;.

I suspect that it might be the latter. Motorola seem happy to licence to the rest of the players. Apple decided that they wanted to use Motorola&#039;s IP without prior consent, effectively showing the whole IP system two fingers, the same system that they have used to their own advantage on several occasions. That does smack of double standards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice to know whether Motorola are trying to charge Apple more than they would charge anyone else or whether Apple are refusing to pay the &#8220;going rate&#8221;.</p>
<p>I suspect that it might be the latter. Motorola seem happy to licence to the rest of the players. Apple decided that they wanted to use Motorola&#8217;s IP without prior consent, effectively showing the whole IP system two fingers, the same system that they have used to their own advantage on several occasions. That does smack of double standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Smyth</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/03/419-apple-on-motorola-ip-claims-in-germany-this-old-pager-patent-is-invalid/#comment-87573</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Smyth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2012/02/03/419-apple-on-motorola-ip-claims-in-germany-this-old-pager-patent-is-invalid/#comment-87573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lawyers always win big  :-) Which is why they are vociferous defenders of the patent system, with claims kicking off at an average of $10-million.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lawyers always win big  :-) Which is why they are vociferous defenders of the patent system, with claims kicking off at an average of $10-million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/03/419-apple-on-motorola-ip-claims-in-germany-this-old-pager-patent-is-invalid/#comment-87572</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2012/02/03/419-apple-on-motorola-ip-claims-in-germany-this-old-pager-patent-is-invalid/#comment-87572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is so ridiculous. This whole patent-war thing, no matter who makes the lawsuits, they&#039;re all losers. 
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so ridiculous. This whole patent-war thing, no matter who makes the lawsuits, they&#8217;re all losers. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netnerd258</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/03/419-apple-on-motorola-ip-claims-in-germany-this-old-pager-patent-is-invalid/#comment-87571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[netnerd258]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2012/02/03/419-apple-on-motorola-ip-claims-in-germany-this-old-pager-patent-is-invalid/#comment-87571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check colored glasses man.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check colored glasses man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kpymou</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/03/419-apple-on-motorola-ip-claims-in-germany-this-old-pager-patent-is-invalid/#comment-87570</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kpymou]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2012/02/03/419-apple-on-motorola-ip-claims-in-germany-this-old-pager-patent-is-invalid/#comment-87570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is the title so biased? Why do u have to be so pro apple? You are a journalist not a fanboy. The title should be something about the whole story which is about court order to stop selling some apple products,  not about what apple had to say about that court order]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is the title so biased? Why do u have to be so pro apple? You are a journalist not a fanboy. The title should be something about the whole story which is about court order to stop selling some apple products,  not about what apple had to say about that court order</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
