<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was Google&#8217;s Disastrous January A Passing Storm Or Sign Of Things To Come?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:19:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Cranston</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/#comment-87594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liz Cranston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/#comment-87594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is in big trouble.  The FTC is investigating.  Watch out, they are doing evil and the good have evidence to stop it.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is in big trouble.  The FTC is investigating.  Watch out, they are doing evil and the good have evidence to stop it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff @ Dead Tree Media</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/#comment-87593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff @ Dead Tree Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/#comment-87593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, not really a disaster at all... really weird article.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, not really a disaster at all&#8230; really weird article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilhelm Reuch</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/#comment-87592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilhelm Reuch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/#comment-87592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People have always overlooked the real Google. That enormous office-building with thousands of phone-salesmen making cold-calls to corporates to get them to buy ads on the web. This is the real Google. The Google that rakes in 97% of the revenue.

The Google store-front with happy nerds playing with their pet-projects and water-guns is just that. A storefront to feed the public/press. 

Now, the nerds have just one strategic mission within Google. And that is to keep any startup in check by attacking the same market and provide a free copycat service. 
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People have always overlooked the real Google. That enormous office-building with thousands of phone-salesmen making cold-calls to corporates to get them to buy ads on the web. This is the real Google. The Google that rakes in 97% of the revenue.</p>
<p>The Google store-front with happy nerds playing with their pet-projects and water-guns is just that. A storefront to feed the public/press. </p>
<p>Now, the nerds have just one strategic mission within Google. And that is to keep any startup in check by attacking the same market and provide a free copycat service. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: invitedmedia</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/#comment-87591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[invitedmedia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/#comment-87591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah, &#039;adapt&#039; is what companies who are trying to keep up with the &quot; changing conditions in the internet&quot; do.

what ever happened to google actually INNOVATING?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, &#8216;adapt&#8217; is what companies who are trying to keep up with the &#8221; changing conditions in the internet&#8221; do.</p>
<p>what ever happened to google actually INNOVATING?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BH</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/#comment-87590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 14:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/#comment-87590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The initial 80% of this article is a steaming pile of Apple fan-boy nonsense. Anyone with a deeper understanding of these issues knows that they amount to nothing. People hate changes, especially ones that are misreported and over-hyped by a lazy press that loves stirring up controversy and knocking down the big guys.

The shorter version of this article could be this: BREAKING: Google is a large public company with a fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders to make money and evolve.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The initial 80% of this article is a steaming pile of Apple fan-boy nonsense. Anyone with a deeper understanding of these issues knows that they amount to nothing. People hate changes, especially ones that are misreported and over-hyped by a lazy press that loves stirring up controversy and knocking down the big guys.</p>
<p>The shorter version of this article could be this: BREAKING: Google is a large public company with a fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders to make money and evolve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: modelportfolio2003</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/#comment-87589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[modelportfolio2003]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/#comment-87589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agree.  And Tom Krazit makes a bunch of assumptions that bear little resemblance to fact.  While some of his comments are made tongue in cheek, it seems with others, the tongue got caught in the cheek! 

&quot;unable to recognize a company that would alter its search results to favor links to a half-baked social network.&quot;  No. Make search results more relevant as social signals play an important part in personalizing the answer to the search.  Google + has more than 100 million users in 6 months, is the fastest growing social network ever, is a pleasure to use and is hardly &quot;half-baked&quot;. FB keeps stealing ideas from G+.

&quot;a public-relations decision borrowed from a desperate company’s playbook&quot;:  what does the simplification of Google&#039;s privacy policies have to do with Apple&#039;s quarter?  Talk about a non-sequitur!  Hardly desperate.  Suggest you read the Google public blog on why the changes were introduced for some fact on that bone. Of course if you prefer to read Microsoft&#039;s interpretation, I can understand why you believe it.

&quot;observers began to wonder if the cash machine that is Google’s AdWords and AdSense had started to wane.&quot;  You mean the quarter which missed analyst expectations (Google never gives guidance so whose fault is it?) based on a higher than expected PPC, a lower than expected CPC a non-deductible tax charge for Clearwire investment write-off, an adverse foreign exchange movement, a larger than expected cap ex spend and Google&#039;s first $ 10 billion + revenue quarter ever? Google blew away estimates in the previous quarter.  Does one quarter mark a big change in Google&#039;s future based on incorrect assumptions by some analysts and just because some analyst told him so? Google is well placed in search (growing 20% plus pa) and mobile (Android is the world&#039;s leading smartphone OS) and display (YouTube, AdExchange,DoubleClick) and is increasingly well placed in local and social.  



]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree.  And Tom Krazit makes a bunch of assumptions that bear little resemblance to fact.  While some of his comments are made tongue in cheek, it seems with others, the tongue got caught in the cheek! </p>
<p>&#8220;unable to recognize a company that would alter its search results to favor links to a half-baked social network.&#8221;  No. Make search results more relevant as social signals play an important part in personalizing the answer to the search.  Google + has more than 100 million users in 6 months, is the fastest growing social network ever, is a pleasure to use and is hardly &#8220;half-baked&#8221;. FB keeps stealing ideas from G+.</p>
<p>&#8220;a public-relations decision borrowed from a desperate company’s playbook&#8221;:  what does the simplification of Google&#8217;s privacy policies have to do with Apple&#8217;s quarter?  Talk about a non-sequitur!  Hardly desperate.  Suggest you read the Google public blog on why the changes were introduced for some fact on that bone. Of course if you prefer to read Microsoft&#8217;s interpretation, I can understand why you believe it.</p>
<p>&#8220;observers began to wonder if the cash machine that is Google’s AdWords and AdSense had started to wane.&#8221;  You mean the quarter which missed analyst expectations (Google never gives guidance so whose fault is it?) based on a higher than expected PPC, a lower than expected CPC a non-deductible tax charge for Clearwire investment write-off, an adverse foreign exchange movement, a larger than expected cap ex spend and Google&#8217;s first $ 10 billion + revenue quarter ever? Google blew away estimates in the previous quarter.  Does one quarter mark a big change in Google&#8217;s future based on incorrect assumptions by some analysts and just because some analyst told him so? Google is well placed in search (growing 20% plus pa) and mobile (Android is the world&#8217;s leading smartphone OS) and display (YouTube, AdExchange,DoubleClick) and is increasingly well placed in local and social.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lrd555</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/#comment-87588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lrd555]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/#comment-87588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forgot at least one more bit of bad news: Motorola posted a $70 million loss for the 4th quarter of 2011. The company Google paid a whopping 30% premium of $12.3 Billion for.
It&#039;s the beginning of the end for Google. 
Expect it to be looking for a buyer by this time next year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot at least one more bit of bad news: Motorola posted a $70 million loss for the 4th quarter of 2011. The company Google paid a whopping 30% premium of $12.3 Billion for.<br />
It&#8217;s the beginning of the end for Google.<br />
Expect it to be looking for a buyer by this time next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Abraham</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/#comment-87587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Abraham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/#comment-87587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is doing what it has to do to survive. It has to adapt to changing conditions in the Internet ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is doing what it has to do to survive. It has to adapt to changing conditions in the Internet </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azazello</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/#comment-87586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[azazello]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2012/02/04/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/#comment-87586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting little article with one caveat: Google&#039;s customers are the advertisers and NOT Anroid owners and Google searchers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting little article with one caveat: Google&#8217;s customers are the advertisers and NOT Anroid owners and Google searchers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
