<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Demand Media Rides Out Storm, Improves Earnings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/17/419-demand-media-rides-out-storm-improves-earnings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/17/419-demand-media-rides-out-storm-improves-earnings/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 12:06:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Jayson</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/17/419-demand-media-rides-out-storm-improves-earnings/#comment-87760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dean Jayson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/419-demand-media-rides-out-storm-improves-earnings/#comment-87760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[eHow has abandoned the long tail and is now competing for eyeballs with traditional
media companies who know a thing or two about quality. The stock is up b/c they stopped paying an army of journalists to write crappy articles. They can cut costs and over-monetize subpar content for another quarter or two at best. It&#039;s a doomed model.  
Famine on the Content Farm:  http://www.ohdigitalmedia.com/2011/11/famine-on-content-farms-ehows-troubled.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eHow has abandoned the long tail and is now competing for eyeballs with traditional<br />
media companies who know a thing or two about quality. The stock is up b/c they stopped paying an army of journalists to write crappy articles. They can cut costs and over-monetize subpar content for another quarter or two at best. It&#8217;s a doomed model. <br />
Famine on the Content Farm:  <a href="http://www.ohdigitalmedia.com/2011/11/famine-on-content-farms-ehows-troubled.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ohdigitalmedia.com/2011/11/famine-on-content-farms-ehows-troubled.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
