<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FAA Reconsiders Takeoff, Landing Policy On E-Readers, Other Devices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/03/19/419-faa-reconsiders-takeoff-landing-ban-on-e-readers-other-devices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/03/19/419-faa-reconsiders-takeoff-landing-ban-on-e-readers-other-devices/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:21:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Magaña Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/03/19/419-faa-reconsiders-takeoff-landing-ban-on-e-readers-other-devices/#comment-88242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabriel Magaña Gonzalez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gostage.paidcontent.org/419-faa-reconsiders-takeoff-landing-ban-on-e-readers-other-devices/#comment-88242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The argument is null and void since the FAA allowed iPads in the cockpit, MUCH closer to the avionics.  So the pilot&#039;s using an iPad, but the passengers cannot?  BS.


to the real problem here is that the FAA has NO incentive at all to give the passengers more enjoyment/freedom.

Safety: Yes. Timeliness: Yes. Profesionalism: Yes.Enjoyment: No.So it&#039;s natural that any proposal that does not advance the core mission of the FAA will not get fast forwarded or maybe even considered quickly.

Glad to see them doing this, but it doe s not make sense that they allow pilots to use iPads all through the flight and then claim &quot;but it would take sooooo much testing to allow for passenger use!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The argument is null and void since the FAA allowed iPads in the cockpit, MUCH closer to the avionics.  So the pilot&#8217;s using an iPad, but the passengers cannot?  BS.</p>
<p>to the real problem here is that the FAA has NO incentive at all to give the passengers more enjoyment/freedom.</p>
<p>Safety: Yes. Timeliness: Yes. Profesionalism: Yes.Enjoyment: No.So it&#8217;s natural that any proposal that does not advance the core mission of the FAA will not get fast forwarded or maybe even considered quickly.</p>
<p>Glad to see them doing this, but it doe s not make sense that they allow pilots to use iPads all through the flight and then claim &#8220;but it would take sooooo much testing to allow for passenger use!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
