<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Magazine Apps Grapple With Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/03/20/419-social-magazine-apps-grapple-with-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/03/20/419-social-magazine-apps-grapple-with-advertising/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:21:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reykjavik</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/03/20/419-social-magazine-apps-grapple-with-advertising/#comment-88261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reykjavik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gostage.paidcontent.org/419-social-magazine-apps-grapple-with-advertising/#comment-88261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone needs to draw a big circle around this transaction and understand how value flows between the various parties. At the end of the day, how has Forbes benefited by permitting another entity to gain audience through using its content, even though there are promotional effects? As Flipboard continues to build a gorgeous reading experience, there will be decreasing incentive for readers to travel to Forbes&#039; products to get their content (and Flipboard&#039;s market power will continue to increase). I&#039;m fine with experimentation, as we don&#039;t know which business model will ultimately prevail, but there seems to be a lot of hand-waving regarding the benefits to traditional publishers. I suspect that Flipboard is the bigger winner here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone needs to draw a big circle around this transaction and understand how value flows between the various parties. At the end of the day, how has Forbes benefited by permitting another entity to gain audience through using its content, even though there are promotional effects? As Flipboard continues to build a gorgeous reading experience, there will be decreasing incentive for readers to travel to Forbes&#8217; products to get their content (and Flipboard&#8217;s market power will continue to increase). I&#8217;m fine with experimentation, as we don&#8217;t know which business model will ultimately prevail, but there seems to be a lot of hand-waving regarding the benefits to traditional publishers. I suspect that Flipboard is the bigger winner here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
