<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google: No more e-books for indie booksellers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/05/google-no-more-e-books-for-indie-booksellers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/05/google-no-more-e-books-for-indie-booksellers/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:03:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sebastianwhitewrites</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/05/google-no-more-e-books-for-indie-booksellers/#comment-89289</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sebastianwhitewrites]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=204766#comment-89289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do we prevent Google stopping independent authors - If I understand this move by the group?

Personally, I have had some terrible experiences with Google. An Ebook was placed on their site, converted by an even worse notorious company First Editions Publishing, which I later had pulled due to concerns about the quality of the Ebook conversion (The paperback still remains I believe great and PLR figures continue to maintain my belief in this) but Google Books, I could not contact them with any issues I had in regard the book.
To the extent, when you would send them an email, it was returned via mailordemon. Worse, when I resorted to placing a complaint on their posts, and enquiry - I never received really a sufficient response from them, and despite not requesting this feature, I received &quot;hundreds&quot; of emails over weeks, notifying me of updates to their posts. 

Google, rather than blaming the independent book fraternity for the lack of sales materializing - I think you should look to yourselves, to see where most of the problem genuinely originates!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do we prevent Google stopping independent authors &#8211; If I understand this move by the group?</p>
<p>Personally, I have had some terrible experiences with Google. An Ebook was placed on their site, converted by an even worse notorious company First Editions Publishing, which I later had pulled due to concerns about the quality of the Ebook conversion (The paperback still remains I believe great and PLR figures continue to maintain my belief in this) but Google Books, I could not contact them with any issues I had in regard the book.<br />
To the extent, when you would send them an email, it was returned via mailordemon. Worse, when I resorted to placing a complaint on their posts, and enquiry &#8211; I never received really a sufficient response from them, and despite not requesting this feature, I received &#8220;hundreds&#8221; of emails over weeks, notifying me of updates to their posts. </p>
<p>Google, rather than blaming the independent book fraternity for the lack of sales materializing &#8211; I think you should look to yourselves, to see where most of the problem genuinely originates!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Zimmerman</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/05/google-no-more-e-books-for-indie-booksellers/#comment-89040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred Zimmerman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 03:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=204766#comment-89040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is not actually a very important story for the simple reason that Google has no traction with its ebook business which amounts to around 1% of Amazon&#039;s. They are probably just pruning as they downsize their whole operation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not actually a very important story for the simple reason that Google has no traction with its ebook business which amounts to around 1% of Amazon&#8217;s. They are probably just pruning as they downsize their whole operation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
