<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everything you need to know about the e-book lawsuit in one post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/11/everything-you-need-to-know-about-e-book-doj-lawsuit-in-one-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/11/everything-you-need-to-know-about-e-book-doj-lawsuit-in-one-post/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John F. Harnish</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/11/everything-you-need-to-know-about-e-book-doj-lawsuit-in-one-post/#comment-104301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John F. Harnish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 01:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=205498#comment-104301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with David, the consumer decides which ebook to buy or not to buy at what price. In this sluggish economy, price is frequently the primary determining factor for the consumer. 

Of course there is the human factor, he/she is known as the author who created the content. The original content was initially edited and produced for the printed on paper editions. However, those paper editions aren’t selling through the projected numbers—the hype to thrust printed book into a shrinking marketplace isn’t working. One senior executive with a mainstream house foolishly tried to justify higher ebook prices as their way of recovering declining profits from dwindling printed book sales. 

Yes, there’s overhead along with frightfully high operating expensives required to maintain these corporate publishing giants. They’re trying to sustain an outdated business model with the zap of overpriced ebook dollars. Ebooks have created an entirely new dynamics in the publishing industry. It is regrettable greedy corporate publishers are attempting to impose an unrealistic pricing structure. 

As for the human factor, I believe authors of ebooks with mainstream houses will suffer because they won’t be paid anywhere near the 70% in royalties they would receive from Amazon and 65% from B&amp;N. On ebooks priced above the consumer-friendly threshold of $9.99 the royalties are only 35% and 40%--and that’s higher than royalties typically paid by traditional publishers. I don’t know what kind of corporate bean-counter did the math, but this is surely a case where less is more.

Another human factor is the consumer. There’s an ongoing boycott by ebook buyers not to purchase ebooks priced above the threshold. The exception to this imposed consumer requirement would be nonfiction titles with proprietary information the reader is specifically interest in.    

I’ve been writing professionally and involve in some aspect of the publishing industry for more than half a century. In recent years I’ve authored and published nineteen ebooks, including the popular series, “Ebooks about Ebooks.” Late in 2011 I retired from a mid-size digital publishing company as Vice President for Author Services. 

Ebooks are the dynamic future of publishing—a fresh start, a new look, an unpolluted platform for creative expressions. This evolving publishing branch needs to be free of the self-serving ways, controlling influences, ill-fated dealings of corporate style publishing. It was the combined efforts of mainstream publishers, distributors/wholesalers, bookstore chains, and major reviewers who suppressed the early growth of POD publishers. This cannot be allowed to happen with ebook publishing.  
 
Enjoy often… John]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with David, the consumer decides which ebook to buy or not to buy at what price. In this sluggish economy, price is frequently the primary determining factor for the consumer. </p>
<p>Of course there is the human factor, he/she is known as the author who created the content. The original content was initially edited and produced for the printed on paper editions. However, those paper editions aren’t selling through the projected numbers—the hype to thrust printed book into a shrinking marketplace isn’t working. One senior executive with a mainstream house foolishly tried to justify higher ebook prices as their way of recovering declining profits from dwindling printed book sales. </p>
<p>Yes, there’s overhead along with frightfully high operating expensives required to maintain these corporate publishing giants. They’re trying to sustain an outdated business model with the zap of overpriced ebook dollars. Ebooks have created an entirely new dynamics in the publishing industry. It is regrettable greedy corporate publishers are attempting to impose an unrealistic pricing structure. </p>
<p>As for the human factor, I believe authors of ebooks with mainstream houses will suffer because they won’t be paid anywhere near the 70% in royalties they would receive from Amazon and 65% from B&amp;N. On ebooks priced above the consumer-friendly threshold of $9.99 the royalties are only 35% and 40%&#8211;and that’s higher than royalties typically paid by traditional publishers. I don’t know what kind of corporate bean-counter did the math, but this is surely a case where less is more.</p>
<p>Another human factor is the consumer. There’s an ongoing boycott by ebook buyers not to purchase ebooks priced above the threshold. The exception to this imposed consumer requirement would be nonfiction titles with proprietary information the reader is specifically interest in.    </p>
<p>I’ve been writing professionally and involve in some aspect of the publishing industry for more than half a century. In recent years I’ve authored and published nineteen ebooks, including the popular series, “Ebooks about Ebooks.” Late in 2011 I retired from a mid-size digital publishing company as Vice President for Author Services. </p>
<p>Ebooks are the dynamic future of publishing—a fresh start, a new look, an unpolluted platform for creative expressions. This evolving publishing branch needs to be free of the self-serving ways, controlling influences, ill-fated dealings of corporate style publishing. It was the combined efforts of mainstream publishers, distributors/wholesalers, bookstore chains, and major reviewers who suppressed the early growth of POD publishers. This cannot be allowed to happen with ebook publishing.  </p>
<p>Enjoy often… John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil NZ</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/11/everything-you-need-to-know-about-e-book-doj-lawsuit-in-one-post/#comment-102699</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil NZ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 23:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=205498#comment-102699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting that this url 
http://paidcontent.org/2012/06/07/barnes-and-noble-doj/

provides the facts on ebook prices for perhaps the first time. A true decrees under the Agency model! 

You can add all the rhetoric you like (from either side) but at the end of the day the stats actually speak for them selves. The DOJ had that info even though the public did not.

This demonstrates that the DOJ is on the wrong side in the battle!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that this url<br />
<a href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/06/07/barnes-and-noble-doj/" rel="nofollow">http://paidcontent.org/2012/06/07/barnes-and-noble-doj/</a></p>
<p>provides the facts on ebook prices for perhaps the first time. A true decrees under the Agency model! </p>
<p>You can add all the rhetoric you like (from either side) but at the end of the day the stats actually speak for them selves. The DOJ had that info even though the public did not.</p>
<p>This demonstrates that the DOJ is on the wrong side in the battle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david roberts</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/11/everything-you-need-to-know-about-e-book-doj-lawsuit-in-one-post/#comment-102672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[david roberts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 16:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=205498#comment-102672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think that it is not acknowledged - we all know that there is a human element, in anything. However, the human element is drastically reduced once the final product is produced. An ebook should, by all rights, be cheaper; however, buying it or not is an economic decision for each of us to make, and that will determine pricing futures.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that it is not acknowledged &#8211; we all know that there is a human element, in anything. However, the human element is drastically reduced once the final product is produced. An ebook should, by all rights, be cheaper; however, buying it or not is an economic decision for each of us to make, and that will determine pricing futures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Youngbauer</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/11/everything-you-need-to-know-about-e-book-doj-lawsuit-in-one-post/#comment-102496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nancy Youngbauer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 15:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=205498#comment-102496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I respectfully disagree: there is plenty of overhead in ebook production, including editing, art, writing (creative content) and formatting. All of these require human labor. Why is this never acknowledged as legitimate overhead?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I respectfully disagree: there is plenty of overhead in ebook production, including editing, art, writing (creative content) and formatting. All of these require human labor. Why is this never acknowledged as legitimate overhead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bodhisatva Bandopadhay</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/11/everything-you-need-to-know-about-e-book-doj-lawsuit-in-one-post/#comment-100556</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bodhisatva Bandopadhay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 02:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=205498#comment-100556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As someone who recently paid $39 for an e-book on the Apple store (a very popular one at that), I&#039;m glad that someone is taking Apple to task. I fail to understand why its $39 for an iBook when the print version is $30 from Amazon. The Kindle edition is $28.

I had to get the book as a reference else I would&#039;ve used Amazon or Bookdepository.

PS: The book in question is the latest edition of the Web Application Hacker&#039;s Handbook (which is a very popular series among web app pen testers).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who recently paid $39 for an e-book on the Apple store (a very popular one at that), I&#8217;m glad that someone is taking Apple to task. I fail to understand why its $39 for an iBook when the print version is $30 from Amazon. The Kindle edition is $28.</p>
<p>I had to get the book as a reference else I would&#8217;ve used Amazon or Bookdepository.</p>
<p>PS: The book in question is the latest edition of the Web Application Hacker&#8217;s Handbook (which is a very popular series among web app pen testers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puggsly</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/11/everything-you-need-to-know-about-e-book-doj-lawsuit-in-one-post/#comment-98901</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[puggsly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 21:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=205498#comment-98901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prices jumped at Amazon because they were selling books at a loss to try to artificially force down the &quot;value&quot; of ebooks. If they did this to drive out competition and devaluate ebooks, they could have a lawsuit heading their way too and the death of Borders and closing of many B&amp;N stores would be damning evidence. 

Proving that Apple did anything wrong in offering book publishers the same sales deal they have with Application, music, TV, and Movie distributers sounds near impossible. But I guess we will see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prices jumped at Amazon because they were selling books at a loss to try to artificially force down the &#8220;value&#8221; of ebooks. If they did this to drive out competition and devaluate ebooks, they could have a lawsuit heading their way too and the death of Borders and closing of many B&amp;N stores would be damning evidence. </p>
<p>Proving that Apple did anything wrong in offering book publishers the same sales deal they have with Application, music, TV, and Movie distributers sounds near impossible. But I guess we will see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puggsly</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/11/everything-you-need-to-know-about-e-book-doj-lawsuit-in-one-post/#comment-98895</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[puggsly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 21:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=205498#comment-98895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t post if you don&#039;t know the facts. Under the previous pricing model Amazon paid half the &quot;list price&quot; of the hard back book. So a book with a list price of $25 for a hard back cost Amazon $12.50 and they sold it for $9.99, loosing $2.51 per book. This is a fact that nobody disputes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t post if you don&#8217;t know the facts. Under the previous pricing model Amazon paid half the &#8220;list price&#8221; of the hard back book. So a book with a list price of $25 for a hard back cost Amazon $12.50 and they sold it for $9.99, loosing $2.51 per book. This is a fact that nobody disputes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/11/everything-you-need-to-know-about-e-book-doj-lawsuit-in-one-post/#comment-98893</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 21:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=205498#comment-98893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you figure?

Why do you think a company who wants to make money would intentionally loose money? Why do you think Borders is dead? and B&amp;N is closing stores all over the place?

Do you think the bits were taking up too much warehouse space and they needed to fire sale them to make room? Why do you think Amazon would take a loss on each book?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you figure?</p>
<p>Why do you think a company who wants to make money would intentionally loose money? Why do you think Borders is dead? and B&amp;N is closing stores all over the place?</p>
<p>Do you think the bits were taking up too much warehouse space and they needed to fire sale them to make room? Why do you think Amazon would take a loss on each book?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenna-Lee</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/11/everything-you-need-to-know-about-e-book-doj-lawsuit-in-one-post/#comment-90207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenna-Lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=205498#comment-90207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I for one find it absolutely ridiculous to pay nearly the same for an e-book as a print copy. I think that the e-books should be dramatically reduced since there essentially is no overhead cost and no printing costs. It&#039;s pure profit (minus fees taken per sale) after the initial establishment. It&#039;s not something you can physically hold. It&#039;s electronic data, transmitted to a reading device. Anything over $8 is absurd.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one find it absolutely ridiculous to pay nearly the same for an e-book as a print copy. I think that the e-books should be dramatically reduced since there essentially is no overhead cost and no printing costs. It&#8217;s pure profit (minus fees taken per sale) after the initial establishment. It&#8217;s not something you can physically hold. It&#8217;s electronic data, transmitted to a reading device. Anything over $8 is absurd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dancingnancy</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/11/everything-you-need-to-know-about-e-book-doj-lawsuit-in-one-post/#comment-90045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dancingnancy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=205498#comment-90045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think she was asking why the prices were different.  I think she was asking why ebooks should be sold under the agency model when paper books are sold in the customary way.  The answer, of course, is: They shouldn&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think she was asking why the prices were different.  I think she was asking why ebooks should be sold under the agency model when paper books are sold in the customary way.  The answer, of course, is: They shouldn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
