<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial Times exec: iOS apps don’t work for publishers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/05/23/ft-web-app-success/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/05/23/ft-web-app-success/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:43:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HDBoy</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/05/23/ft-web-app-success/#comment-101341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HDBoy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 12:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=209711#comment-101341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bull. Apple&#039;s 30% App Store cut of media sales is lower than the printing and distribution costs off printing daily newspapers or weekly magazines.

Publications like the FT just want direct access to contact info to re-sell it and inundate besieged consumers with even more advertising spam. Fortunately, Apple&#039;s App Store introduces protective, insulating curation between consumer&#039;s private data and publishers.

I prefer to limit access to my contact info and let the more innovative and trustworthy company help manage my subscriptions and deliver a more consistent media buying and consumption experience.

Finally, the FT is a venerable British pubication, but it also is a Microsoft shop and that spouts venomous, anti-Apple rhetoric ad nauseum. The company&#039;s position on the App Store issue is compromised by numerous conflicts of interest, and is just one more example of why the FT lacks credibility when discussing anything Apple.

Finally, most digital media publishers, including the FT, have not yet acknowledged (nor accounted for in pricing) the fact that consumers now pay for the modern, digital distribution systems through iPad, iPhone purchases and Internet bandwidth subscriptions.

Modern publishers need to get their heads out of their rear ends and wake up to the fact that new technology cedes control to consumers. This means the digital publishing business model is destined to change.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bull. Apple&#8217;s 30% App Store cut of media sales is lower than the printing and distribution costs off printing daily newspapers or weekly magazines.</p>
<p>Publications like the FT just want direct access to contact info to re-sell it and inundate besieged consumers with even more advertising spam. Fortunately, Apple&#8217;s App Store introduces protective, insulating curation between consumer&#8217;s private data and publishers.</p>
<p>I prefer to limit access to my contact info and let the more innovative and trustworthy company help manage my subscriptions and deliver a more consistent media buying and consumption experience.</p>
<p>Finally, the FT is a venerable British pubication, but it also is a Microsoft shop and that spouts venomous, anti-Apple rhetoric ad nauseum. The company&#8217;s position on the App Store issue is compromised by numerous conflicts of interest, and is just one more example of why the FT lacks credibility when discussing anything Apple.</p>
<p>Finally, most digital media publishers, including the FT, have not yet acknowledged (nor accounted for in pricing) the fact that consumers now pay for the modern, digital distribution systems through iPad, iPhone purchases and Internet bandwidth subscriptions.</p>
<p>Modern publishers need to get their heads out of their rear ends and wake up to the fact that new technology cedes control to consumers. This means the digital publishing business model is destined to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zato</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/05/23/ft-web-app-success/#comment-100837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zato]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 11:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=209711#comment-100837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“I don’t need Apple to tell the world the Financial Times is here. We’ve been here for 120 years.” said Grimshaw. &quot;Besides, we&#039;re Microsofties, we hate Apple. We wouldn&#039;t give them 2%.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I don’t need Apple to tell the world the Financial Times is here. We’ve been here for 120 years.” said Grimshaw. &#8220;Besides, we&#8217;re Microsofties, we hate Apple. We wouldn&#8217;t give them 2%.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Golebiewski</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/05/23/ft-web-app-success/#comment-100587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Golebiewski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=209711#comment-100587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Publishers are used to being B2B operators. We didn’t know our customers.” I liked that &quot;moment of truth&quot; from FT.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Publishers are used to being B2B operators. We didn’t know our customers.” I liked that &#8220;moment of truth&#8221; from FT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandman619</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/05/23/ft-web-app-success/#comment-100525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandman619]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 21:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=209711#comment-100525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many publications that haven&#039;t found success behind a pay wall, so not every publisher has the same experiences. Just as many publishers reported large increases in their subscriber base when their publications were released on Newstand. If 30% is too much for a publisher to give to a retailer, then how do newstands around the country make money ?

Cheers !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many publications that haven&#8217;t found success behind a pay wall, so not every publisher has the same experiences. Just as many publishers reported large increases in their subscriber base when their publications were released on Newstand. If 30% is too much for a publisher to give to a retailer, then how do newstands around the country make money ?</p>
<p>Cheers !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
