<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Letters to the DOJ: Public speaks out on e-book pricing case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/05/31/letters-to-the-doj-ebook-pricing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/05/31/letters-to-the-doj-ebook-pricing/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:47:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/05/31/letters-to-the-doj-ebook-pricing/#comment-101385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 21:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=210335#comment-101385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We won&#039;t if the DOJ and Amazon have their way. Enjoy quality vetted books while you can.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We won&#8217;t if the DOJ and Amazon have their way. Enjoy quality vetted books while you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Dashnaw</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/05/31/letters-to-the-doj-ebook-pricing/#comment-101375</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cindy Dashnaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 19:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=210335#comment-101375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether we&#039;re an individual, a business or a monopoly, we all can relate to self-published author David Gaughran&#039;s comment (above), &quot;The actions the defending publishers and Apple are alleged to have undertaken … are motivated by fear. The world is changing and they don’t like it.&quot; No doubt, there was a lot of fear around the conference room table when Booktango, a self-publishing outlet, decided to pay authors 100% of the royalties they earned (caveats apply, of course, but ridiculously few). Yet, the most visionary people are the ones who realize that the world IS changing, and we must all change along with it. 

In the olden days, people within an outlying town could subscribe to a percentage of time with a newspaper -- meaning that Mr. Smith received the one physical copy first, then he was required to pass it along to Mr. Jones, who then sent it on to Miss Abbott. It&#039;s likely that when the idea came up for each individual to receive his or her own copy, to keep, numerous arguments were made against that approach, too.

Let&#039;s hope that it&#039;s the authors who create the product and the readers who consume it that come out ahead in the end of this debate!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether we&#8217;re an individual, a business or a monopoly, we all can relate to self-published author David Gaughran&#8217;s comment (above), &#8220;The actions the defending publishers and Apple are alleged to have undertaken … are motivated by fear. The world is changing and they don’t like it.&#8221; No doubt, there was a lot of fear around the conference room table when Booktango, a self-publishing outlet, decided to pay authors 100% of the royalties they earned (caveats apply, of course, but ridiculously few). Yet, the most visionary people are the ones who realize that the world IS changing, and we must all change along with it. </p>
<p>In the olden days, people within an outlying town could subscribe to a percentage of time with a newspaper &#8212; meaning that Mr. Smith received the one physical copy first, then he was required to pass it along to Mr. Jones, who then sent it on to Miss Abbott. It&#8217;s likely that when the idea came up for each individual to receive his or her own copy, to keep, numerous arguments were made against that approach, too.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope that it&#8217;s the authors who create the product and the readers who consume it that come out ahead in the end of this debate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
