http://paidcontent.org/2012/06/20/netflix-gives-itself-a-year-to-out-bid-sky-for-uk-movies/ The economics of digital content Sat, 18 May 2013 18:43:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://paidcontent.org/2012/06/20/netflix-gives-itself-a-year-to-out-bid-sky-for-uk-movies/#comment-105458 Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:53:13 +0000 http://paidcontent.org/?p=211957#comment-105458 Monopsony is not what the Competition Commission’s revised provisional finding set out to find or otherwise. But the commission had talked of monopsony earlier investigation. So I have removed the “sic”, to confirm that Netflix was indeed referring correctly to an alleged monopsony, not an alleged monopoly.

]]> http://paidcontent.org/2012/06/20/netflix-gives-itself-a-year-to-out-bid-sky-for-uk-movies/#comment-105436 Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:19:28 +0000 http://paidcontent.org/?p=211957#comment-105436 Monopsony is not a misspelling. It is when one buyer dominates a market. In contrast, a monopoly is when one seller dominates a market.

]]> http://paidcontent.org/2012/06/20/netflix-gives-itself-a-year-to-out-bid-sky-for-uk-movies/#comment-105403 Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:30:08 +0000 http://paidcontent.org/?p=211957#comment-105403 Why the (sic) on monopsony? Although I don’t think it accurately describes the market, it seems grammatically correct.

]]>