<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Diller and Aereo win first round: injunction denied</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/11/diller-and-aereo-win-first-round-injunction-denied/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/11/diller-and-aereo-win-first-round-injunction-denied/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:22:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: H Katz</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/11/diller-and-aereo-win-first-round-injunction-denied/#comment-110613</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[H Katz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=213689#comment-110613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The key difference is that with the cable company, people are sharing an incoming feed picked up off of satellite provided by the networks to the cable companies. In Aereo&#039;s case, they are renting you a DVR and a single antenna that is yours alone to control that only picks up OTA television.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key difference is that with the cable company, people are sharing an incoming feed picked up off of satellite provided by the networks to the cable companies. In Aereo&#8217;s case, they are renting you a DVR and a single antenna that is yours alone to control that only picks up OTA television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Herman Simon</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/11/diller-and-aereo-win-first-round-injunction-denied/#comment-110562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Herman Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 10:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=213689#comment-110562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great summary.  Expect action in Congress soon..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great summary.  Expect action in Congress soon..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/11/diller-and-aereo-win-first-round-injunction-denied/#comment-110498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 03:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=213689#comment-110498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Aereo set up enough of their antennas and acquired enough customers to have as many customers as a cable company in NYC, I don&#039;t see how Aereo would be any different from a cable company in NYC. So Aereo&#039;s antennas allow their clients to control what they see - a cable company&#039;s clients can also control what they see. I think Aereo is trying to exploit a loophole in the copyright law and accomplish something that could not have been anticipated when the law was written.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Aereo set up enough of their antennas and acquired enough customers to have as many customers as a cable company in NYC, I don&#8217;t see how Aereo would be any different from a cable company in NYC. So Aereo&#8217;s antennas allow their clients to control what they see &#8211; a cable company&#8217;s clients can also control what they see. I think Aereo is trying to exploit a loophole in the copyright law and accomplish something that could not have been anticipated when the law was written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web3dlaw</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/11/diller-and-aereo-win-first-round-injunction-denied/#comment-110464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[web3dlaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=213689#comment-110464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://socialmedianmeanandmode.wordpress.com/2012/07/11/30/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;#Hashtag - Thoughts on the Law and Social Media....&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://socialmedianmeanandmode.wordpress.com/2012/07/11/30/" rel="nofollow">#Hashtag &#8211; Thoughts on the Law and Social Media&#8230;.</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
