<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DOJ says it received over 800 comments on ebook pricing case, needs more time to publish them</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/11/doj-says-it-received-over-800-comments-on-ebook-pricing-case-needs-more-time-to-post-them-publicly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/11/doj-says-it-received-over-800-comments-on-ebook-pricing-case-needs-more-time-to-post-them-publicly/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron M. G. Sanford, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/11/doj-says-it-received-over-800-comments-on-ebook-pricing-case-needs-more-time-to-post-them-publicly/#comment-111497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Byron M. G. Sanford, Esq.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=213720#comment-111497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://briskinlaw.wordpress.com/2012/07/18/335/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Briskin, Cross &amp; Sanford, LLC&lt;/a&gt; and commented: 
The DOJ&#039;s anti-trust suit against &quot;Big Publishing&quot; continues to be interesting and contentious. Even with proposed settlement on the table, it is less than clear who is really looking out for who&#039;s interests.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://briskinlaw.wordpress.com/2012/07/18/335/" rel="nofollow">Briskin, Cross &amp; Sanford, LLC</a> and commented:<br />
The DOJ&#8217;s anti-trust suit against &#8220;Big Publishing&#8221; continues to be interesting and contentious. Even with proposed settlement on the table, it is less than clear who is really looking out for who&#8217;s interests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thomas</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/11/doj-says-it-received-over-800-comments-on-ebook-pricing-case-needs-more-time-to-post-them-publicly/#comment-110971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Thomas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 23:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=213720#comment-110971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting update: http://www.idealog.com/blog/royalty-share-ceo-bob-kohn-alleges-doj-violates-the-tunney-act/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting update: <a href="http://www.idealog.com/blog/royalty-share-ceo-bob-kohn-alleges-doj-violates-the-tunney-act/" rel="nofollow">http://www.idealog.com/blog/royalty-share-ceo-bob-kohn-alleges-doj-violates-the-tunney-act/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H. Deans</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/11/doj-says-it-received-over-800-comments-on-ebook-pricing-case-needs-more-time-to-post-them-publicly/#comment-110912</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David H. Deans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 14:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=213720#comment-110912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past, the federal government would likely not hear the public outcry about the collusion, corruption and blatant &quot;restraint of trade&quot; practices. Clearly, today the people demand justice from a system that has tolerated these abuses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the past, the federal government would likely not hear the public outcry about the collusion, corruption and blatant &#8220;restraint of trade&#8221; practices. Clearly, today the people demand justice from a system that has tolerated these abuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thomas</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/11/doj-says-it-received-over-800-comments-on-ebook-pricing-case-needs-more-time-to-post-them-publicly/#comment-110612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Thomas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 14:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=213720#comment-110612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Am I alone in seeing a certain irony that the DOJ is having difficulty publishing a folio regarding a case against publishers? High-speed scanners, compilation software, an indexer, an editor...hey, it sounds like a job for a professional outfit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I alone in seeing a certain irony that the DOJ is having difficulty publishing a folio regarding a case against publishers? High-speed scanners, compilation software, an indexer, an editor&#8230;hey, it sounds like a job for a professional outfit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
