<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey DOJ, where are the public comments on the ebook pricing case?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/11/hey-doj-where-are-the-public-comments-on-the-ebook-pricing-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/11/hey-doj-where-are-the-public-comments-on-the-ebook-pricing-case/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:04:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H. Deans</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/11/hey-doj-where-are-the-public-comments-on-the-ebook-pricing-case/#comment-110915</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David H. Deans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 15:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=213607#comment-110915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob Kohn seems focused on the wrong issue here, regarding the &quot;Justice Department’s flagrant noncompliance with federal law.&quot;

What about all the &quot;restraint of trade&quot; abuses that have been tolerated in the past, while the DOJ looked the other way? -- that&#039;s the more troubling non-compliance issue that Kohn failed to mention.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob Kohn seems focused on the wrong issue here, regarding the &#8220;Justice Department’s flagrant noncompliance with federal law.&#8221;</p>
<p>What about all the &#8220;restraint of trade&#8221; abuses that have been tolerated in the past, while the DOJ looked the other way? &#8212; that&#8217;s the more troubling non-compliance issue that Kohn failed to mention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KNOWSTOOMUCH</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/11/hey-doj-where-are-the-public-comments-on-the-ebook-pricing-case/#comment-110692</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KNOWSTOOMUCH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 18:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=213607#comment-110692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because they are too busy hidding evidence that there was a cover up invovling the White House in the gun running scandel and that is why they don&#039;t want to turn over legally requested documents requested by the Congress.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because they are too busy hidding evidence that there was a cover up invovling the White House in the gun running scandel and that is why they don&#8217;t want to turn over legally requested documents requested by the Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
