<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analysts: DirecTV/Viacom battle will come down to digital rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/16/analyst-directvviacom-battle-will-come-down-to-digital-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/16/analyst-directvviacom-battle-will-come-down-to-digital-rights/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:21:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamica</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/16/analyst-directvviacom-battle-will-come-down-to-digital-rights/#comment-111717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tamica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=214016#comment-111717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enjoy all of the positive messages that Directv is getting and posting on their site. I think they don&#039;t post the bad ones.....  I think that both of the organizations are to blame and that the consumer is the one left holding the bag. If the costs go up at all then I may as well switch to a cable provider that can do phone, internet and TV all in one and pay about the same, or a little less. If this silliness continues I think that I will switch anyway just because I truly think that it is selfish and unprofessional to A-take the channels away B-not adjust billing accordingly C-play the blame game. 

Both companies knew this was happening and no one decided to do anything about it until it was too late. That is irresponsible and shameful. I do thank Directv for trying to keep costs down but my answer to the problem,pay Viacom and give the executive staff at Directv lower bonuses. They should have figured this out before the problem got this big anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy all of the positive messages that Directv is getting and posting on their site. I think they don&#8217;t post the bad ones&#8230;..  I think that both of the organizations are to blame and that the consumer is the one left holding the bag. If the costs go up at all then I may as well switch to a cable provider that can do phone, internet and TV all in one and pay about the same, or a little less. If this silliness continues I think that I will switch anyway just because I truly think that it is selfish and unprofessional to A-take the channels away B-not adjust billing accordingly C-play the blame game. </p>
<p>Both companies knew this was happening and no one decided to do anything about it until it was too late. That is irresponsible and shameful. I do thank Directv for trying to keep costs down but my answer to the problem,pay Viacom and give the executive staff at Directv lower bonuses. They should have figured this out before the problem got this big anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suryadihafid</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/16/analyst-directvviacom-battle-will-come-down-to-digital-rights/#comment-111659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[suryadihafid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 12:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=214016#comment-111659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://suryadihafid.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/30/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;suryadihafid&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://suryadihafid.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/30/" rel="nofollow">suryadihafid</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k.d.</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/16/analyst-directvviacom-battle-will-come-down-to-digital-rights/#comment-111540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[k.d.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 02:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=214016#comment-111540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can see lots of people getting fed-up paying for TV, with both sides of the fight losing money. The vast majority of programming is reality shows - how horrible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see lots of people getting fed-up paying for TV, with both sides of the fight losing money. The vast majority of programming is reality shows &#8211; how horrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Christensen</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/16/analyst-directvviacom-battle-will-come-down-to-digital-rights/#comment-111470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Christensen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 18:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=214016#comment-111470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know $3 is $3...but if you have the loot to pay for directv you have the extra $3...it&#039;s 3 friggin dollars. If that makes or breaks your monthly finance you may want to loosen up your budget a little bit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know $3 is $3&#8230;but if you have the loot to pay for directv you have the extra $3&#8230;it&#8217;s 3 friggin dollars. If that makes or breaks your monthly finance you may want to loosen up your budget a little bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frustrated</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/16/analyst-directvviacom-battle-will-come-down-to-digital-rights/#comment-111355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frustrated]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=214016#comment-111355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instead of making customers pay for the music channels, more then ten home shopping channels and random channels that I don&#039;t believe anyone uses; drop those channels, pay whom ever what they want and let us go about our regularly scheduled programming. I have been with DTV for a long time and Yep!, I hate them. I had to drop to a cheaper plan (you know the one right above the jack sh@t plan) and lost 10 channels. You can also bet that all the BS channels were still there. Now, I have lost another half dozen or so. If DTV really cared about &quot;helping&quot;  they would actually listen to it&#039;s customers and stop frustrating them. I can&#039;t switch because I&#039;m broke but when I&#039;m not, Comcast here I come! I plan on going with a big package and going HD! I can afford their fees. Over Ten years w/ DTV and they still want to charge $200 for the hd reciever.  I know, as a consumer have I no control over this situation and it hurts to know I will be missing 2 or more Workaholics episodes!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of making customers pay for the music channels, more then ten home shopping channels and random channels that I don&#8217;t believe anyone uses; drop those channels, pay whom ever what they want and let us go about our regularly scheduled programming. I have been with DTV for a long time and Yep!, I hate them. I had to drop to a cheaper plan (you know the one right above the jack sh@t plan) and lost 10 channels. You can also bet that all the BS channels were still there. Now, I have lost another half dozen or so. If DTV really cared about &#8220;helping&#8221;  they would actually listen to it&#8217;s customers and stop frustrating them. I can&#8217;t switch because I&#8217;m broke but when I&#8217;m not, Comcast here I come! I plan on going with a big package and going HD! I can afford their fees. Over Ten years w/ DTV and they still want to charge $200 for the hd reciever.  I know, as a consumer have I no control over this situation and it hurts to know I will be missing 2 or more Workaholics episodes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/16/analyst-directvviacom-battle-will-come-down-to-digital-rights/#comment-111333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=214016#comment-111333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And I&#039;m sure you read the entire contract you signed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I&#8217;m sure you read the entire contract you signed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan McRaney</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/16/analyst-directvviacom-battle-will-come-down-to-digital-rights/#comment-111326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan McRaney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=214016#comment-111326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And they say that a class-action suit isn&#039;t possible, because DirecTv (sat providers) don&#039;t fall under any &quot;laws&quot; with their contracts. Well, SOME law of some kind keeps me in contract with them, so some kind of law is being broken by me not getting the channels I signed up to receive nearly a year ago...and if they can&#039;t provide those channels to me, then they are in breach of their own contract.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And they say that a class-action suit isn&#8217;t possible, because DirecTv (sat providers) don&#8217;t fall under any &#8220;laws&#8221; with their contracts. Well, SOME law of some kind keeps me in contract with them, so some kind of law is being broken by me not getting the channels I signed up to receive nearly a year ago&#8230;and if they can&#8217;t provide those channels to me, then they are in breach of their own contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefani</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/16/analyst-directvviacom-battle-will-come-down-to-digital-rights/#comment-111320</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stefani]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 08:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=214016#comment-111320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If this dispute does not get resolved I will be forced to drop DirecTv!!   It should be up
To the consumer if they want to pay or not]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this dispute does not get resolved I will be forced to drop DirecTv!!   It should be up<br />
To the consumer if they want to pay or not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woffice</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/16/analyst-directvviacom-battle-will-come-down-to-digital-rights/#comment-111313</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[woffice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=214016#comment-111313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d like to submit a &quot;disagree&quot; with this analysis. The blowback seems to be squarely put upon Viacom for the outage. Outrage by knowledgeable viewers appears to outweigh those that are merely outraged by a factor of 10 to 1.

As well, Viacom can only exist so long without DirecTV&#039;s revenue and its viewers, which seems to add up to, in some cases, as much as 43% of overall viewership. That&#039;s $2+ billion plus lost ad revenue that&#039;s NOT going into the Viacom coffers. Every day this lingers, Viacom takes a hit with viewers and advertisers. While DirecTV plods merrily along hardly worse for wear. It may hurt them too, but not nearly to the extent that Viacom is eating daily.

Viacom has already been forced to put their digital content back on Hulu&#039;s free site due to overwhelming response from all fans. Someone had to crack first, and it appears that Viacom is that someone. DirecTV looks more and more like the cowboy in the white hat with each concession.

DirecTV will end up ponying up some more money, but it won&#039;t be what Viacom is asking for. They have them over a barrel now and they know it, to ultimately give in would be foolish. Since most people don&#039;t use their On Demand service, I&#039;d guess that that&#039;s where the break will be. DirecTV will get the handful of the 26 channels it really wants back, without being able to furnish the digital reruns. And come out looking like heroes to their customer base. Even if their motives aren&#039;t as altruistic as they&#039;d have us believe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to submit a &#8220;disagree&#8221; with this analysis. The blowback seems to be squarely put upon Viacom for the outage. Outrage by knowledgeable viewers appears to outweigh those that are merely outraged by a factor of 10 to 1.</p>
<p>As well, Viacom can only exist so long without DirecTV&#8217;s revenue and its viewers, which seems to add up to, in some cases, as much as 43% of overall viewership. That&#8217;s $2+ billion plus lost ad revenue that&#8217;s NOT going into the Viacom coffers. Every day this lingers, Viacom takes a hit with viewers and advertisers. While DirecTV plods merrily along hardly worse for wear. It may hurt them too, but not nearly to the extent that Viacom is eating daily.</p>
<p>Viacom has already been forced to put their digital content back on Hulu&#8217;s free site due to overwhelming response from all fans. Someone had to crack first, and it appears that Viacom is that someone. DirecTV looks more and more like the cowboy in the white hat with each concession.</p>
<p>DirecTV will end up ponying up some more money, but it won&#8217;t be what Viacom is asking for. They have them over a barrel now and they know it, to ultimately give in would be foolish. Since most people don&#8217;t use their On Demand service, I&#8217;d guess that that&#8217;s where the break will be. DirecTV will get the handful of the 26 channels it really wants back, without being able to furnish the digital reruns. And come out looking like heroes to their customer base. Even if their motives aren&#8217;t as altruistic as they&#8217;d have us believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/07/16/analyst-directvviacom-battle-will-come-down-to-digital-rights/#comment-111293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 02:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=214016#comment-111293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Direct Tv gives, they will have to raise monthly fees. Then you will be the one crying like a 5 year old.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Direct Tv gives, they will have to raise monthly fees. Then you will be the one crying like a 5 year old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
