<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital magazines boom too little to grow overall sales</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/08/16/digital-magazines-boom-too-little-to-grow-overall-sales/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/08/16/digital-magazines-boom-too-little-to-grow-overall-sales/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 07:03:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gethill</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/08/16/digital-magazines-boom-too-little-to-grow-overall-sales/#comment-127546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gethill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=216528#comment-127546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why does digital magazine reporting always have to be laced with negativity? In February the top digital ABC was 7,779. Now it&#039;s 17,682 – 127% growth in six months

That outperforms any other kind of growth reported this ABC period, surely? OK, the numbers aren&#039;t as big, but we&#039;re going from a standing start, this is an industry in its infancy. Growth is always important.

I work at T3, and what&#039;s also apparently being lost in this reporting is we also sell 10k a month of our Zinio digital replica (the figure that every other magazine is quoting, as we are the only iPad edition to have a certified ABC in its own right). 

We post annual ABCs, and in Feb this year the Zinio number was recorded around the 7k mark, if we&#039;re going strictly official - which actually takes T3, officially, to around 25k sales a month – more than a third of our 70k circulation, which is the brand&#039;s best ever. 

So if you combine T3&#039;s two official digital ABCs, the six-monthly rise from the highest digital ABC in February to now is actually 221%, if we&#039;re talking issue sales not advertising exposure.

Let&#039;s not confuse ABC - a measurement of how many people see an advert and no more – with actual digital sales. They are different. T3 has interactive iPad and Android Editions, alongside Zinio+ version, a flat Kindle Fire one for the US, and there will be more, and not all are yet counted on our ABC.

You&#039;re right, typically mass-market mainstream brands may struggle to find the level of audience they need, but niche brands and cleverly targeted magazines – The Week is a great example – are thriving just fine. Talking about the industry as if it&#039;s one entity rather than digging deeper isn&#039;t doing anyone any favours]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does digital magazine reporting always have to be laced with negativity? In February the top digital ABC was 7,779. Now it&#8217;s 17,682 – 127% growth in six months</p>
<p>That outperforms any other kind of growth reported this ABC period, surely? OK, the numbers aren&#8217;t as big, but we&#8217;re going from a standing start, this is an industry in its infancy. Growth is always important.</p>
<p>I work at T3, and what&#8217;s also apparently being lost in this reporting is we also sell 10k a month of our Zinio digital replica (the figure that every other magazine is quoting, as we are the only iPad edition to have a certified ABC in its own right). </p>
<p>We post annual ABCs, and in Feb this year the Zinio number was recorded around the 7k mark, if we&#8217;re going strictly official &#8211; which actually takes T3, officially, to around 25k sales a month – more than a third of our 70k circulation, which is the brand&#8217;s best ever. </p>
<p>So if you combine T3&#8242;s two official digital ABCs, the six-monthly rise from the highest digital ABC in February to now is actually 221%, if we&#8217;re talking issue sales not advertising exposure.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not confuse ABC &#8211; a measurement of how many people see an advert and no more – with actual digital sales. They are different. T3 has interactive iPad and Android Editions, alongside Zinio+ version, a flat Kindle Fire one for the US, and there will be more, and not all are yet counted on our ABC.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, typically mass-market mainstream brands may struggle to find the level of audience they need, but niche brands and cleverly targeted magazines – The Week is a great example – are thriving just fine. Talking about the industry as if it&#8217;s one entity rather than digging deeper isn&#8217;t doing anyone any favours</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/08/16/digital-magazines-boom-too-little-to-grow-overall-sales/#comment-126856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=216528#comment-126856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Magazines were born from necessity - short form content bundled together for distribution purposes. There are unnecessary in the digital age, and should rightfully fade away.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Magazines were born from necessity &#8211; short form content bundled together for distribution purposes. There are unnecessary in the digital age, and should rightfully fade away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
