<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could TV&#8217;s &#8216;second screen&#8217; be used for even more TV?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/10/04/could-tvs-second-screen-be-used-for-even-more-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/10/04/could-tvs-second-screen-be-used-for-even-more-tv/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 07:03:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Johnson</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/10/04/could-tvs-second-screen-be-used-for-even-more-tv/#comment-160594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=218649#comment-160594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This fascinates me purely from the perspective of something I wrote about a couple of years ago - the potential of the social internet giving anyone the chance to build a fanbase by hijacking the commentary of our favourite shows...especially sports.  We saw it at the World Cup when the BBC let Chris Moyles and Comedy Dave do an alternative commentary over the red button.  

It worked pretty well albeit taking over the actual audio stream on your big screen, unlike YAPPFACTOR which does risk becoming noise over that man Dermot, but who is to know....maybe letting Jakes comedy onto our sofas aint such a scary thought, maybe it is...something the viewers will  decide.

As for Zeebox hijacking advertising revenues from ITV, Syco and Freemantlemedia - a bit of doom-mongering from the folks at Telegraph is sometimes a good thing.  

Will it actually happen?  Nope.  

If YAPPFACTOR becomes a success, then will it make ITV look at their legal options before realising they need to stop trying to protect an old model and start exploring the new?  Hopefully.

Either way ITV and all the other broadcasters will be sitting up and watching to see how viewers take to this kind of thing...if viewers like it, then they might even realise that its gonna help them when it comes to negotiating new deals with some of their overpriced talent (not you Dermot....you are worth every penny ha!)

Finally, maybe Simon Cowell and Will.i.am should invite Anthony Rose to be a judge on their new show which they say is looking for the next uber geek supremo...now that would be some kind of irony for Syco :p

@mediadventurer]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This fascinates me purely from the perspective of something I wrote about a couple of years ago &#8211; the potential of the social internet giving anyone the chance to build a fanbase by hijacking the commentary of our favourite shows&#8230;especially sports.  We saw it at the World Cup when the BBC let Chris Moyles and Comedy Dave do an alternative commentary over the red button.  </p>
<p>It worked pretty well albeit taking over the actual audio stream on your big screen, unlike YAPPFACTOR which does risk becoming noise over that man Dermot, but who is to know&#8230;.maybe letting Jakes comedy onto our sofas aint such a scary thought, maybe it is&#8230;something the viewers will  decide.</p>
<p>As for Zeebox hijacking advertising revenues from ITV, Syco and Freemantlemedia &#8211; a bit of doom-mongering from the folks at Telegraph is sometimes a good thing.  </p>
<p>Will it actually happen?  Nope.  </p>
<p>If YAPPFACTOR becomes a success, then will it make ITV look at their legal options before realising they need to stop trying to protect an old model and start exploring the new?  Hopefully.</p>
<p>Either way ITV and all the other broadcasters will be sitting up and watching to see how viewers take to this kind of thing&#8230;if viewers like it, then they might even realise that its gonna help them when it comes to negotiating new deals with some of their overpriced talent (not you Dermot&#8230;.you are worth every penny ha!)</p>
<p>Finally, maybe Simon Cowell and Will.i.am should invite Anthony Rose to be a judge on their new show which they say is looking for the next uber geek supremo&#8230;now that would be some kind of irony for Syco :p</p>
<p>@mediadventurer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Andrews</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/10/04/could-tvs-second-screen-be-used-for-even-more-tv/#comment-160558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Andrews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=218649#comment-160558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;media is already plural, multimedia is a pointless (hence its ubiquity) term&quot; - like it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;media is already plural, multimedia is a pointless (hence its ubiquity) term&#8221; &#8211; like it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Altman</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/10/04/could-tvs-second-screen-be-used-for-even-more-tv/#comment-160542</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Altman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 12:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=218649#comment-160542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[media is already plural, multimedia is a pointless (hence its ubiquity) term.  here&#039;s the gravity insight, dynamic links, crowdsourced THEN vetted by whomever wants to build a business model on determining relevance from spam.  THANK YOU, NEXT! (oh yeah, 3 days a minute works out to 4320 years/year) NEXT!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>media is already plural, multimedia is a pointless (hence its ubiquity) term.  here&#8217;s the gravity insight, dynamic links, crowdsourced THEN vetted by whomever wants to build a business model on determining relevance from spam.  THANK YOU, NEXT! (oh yeah, 3 days a minute works out to 4320 years/year) NEXT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
