<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon apparently discontinues Kindle Touch in favor of Paperwhite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/10/22/amazon-apparently-discontinues-kindle-touch-in-favor-of-paperwhite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/10/22/amazon-apparently-discontinues-kindle-touch-in-favor-of-paperwhite/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:45:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: biogeeklogy</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/10/22/amazon-apparently-discontinues-kindle-touch-in-favor-of-paperwhite/#comment-187586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[biogeeklogy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=219385#comment-187586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a kindle touch, and I like the look of the paperwhite, but see no reason to upgrade when there will be a whole-new breed of the things next christmas. XP If anything I am getting a cheap used kindle keyboard for travel and because the kindle touch sometimes likes to &#039;skip&#039; several pages while reading. It also does not allow you to highlight text over a pagebreak like the older kindles do. Luckily I can put the same library on both. 

Neither are all that great for reading PDF&#039;s, which I have to do for school, work and research using peer reviewed journals. For that I&#039;d go with a version of the Nook Color or a tablet, no doubt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a kindle touch, and I like the look of the paperwhite, but see no reason to upgrade when there will be a whole-new breed of the things next christmas. XP If anything I am getting a cheap used kindle keyboard for travel and because the kindle touch sometimes likes to &#8216;skip&#8217; several pages while reading. It also does not allow you to highlight text over a pagebreak like the older kindles do. Luckily I can put the same library on both. </p>
<p>Neither are all that great for reading PDF&#8217;s, which I have to do for school, work and research using peer reviewed journals. For that I&#8217;d go with a version of the Nook Color or a tablet, no doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james smith</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/10/22/amazon-apparently-discontinues-kindle-touch-in-favor-of-paperwhite/#comment-166784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[james smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 01:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=219385#comment-166784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[****Mike***** Enquire about reductions on traditional Audio books--Here in England at the very least sales tax would not apply, that normally would]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>****Mike***** Enquire about reductions on traditional Audio books&#8211;Here in England at the very least sales tax would not apply, that normally would</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/10/22/amazon-apparently-discontinues-kindle-touch-in-favor-of-paperwhite/#comment-166519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 00:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=219385#comment-166519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FYI, the paperwhite doesn&#039;t have the read text aloud feature.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, the paperwhite doesn&#8217;t have the read text aloud feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stacy</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/10/22/amazon-apparently-discontinues-kindle-touch-in-favor-of-paperwhite/#comment-166159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stacy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 23:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=219385#comment-166159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[well im upset because my best buy stores dont have any kindles at all. i have been calling back everyday but no one seems to know when they&quot;ll be in. im really upset over this. i want my kindle already. its just unacceptable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well im upset because my best buy stores dont have any kindles at all. i have been calling back everyday but no one seems to know when they&#8221;ll be in. im really upset over this. i want my kindle already. its just unacceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TRE</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/10/22/amazon-apparently-discontinues-kindle-touch-in-favor-of-paperwhite/#comment-166018</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TRE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=219385#comment-166018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love PaperWhite. I prefer the e-Ink type of technology over the bright back-lit screen stuff that hurts my eyes. Though, those LED/plasma screen devices cannot be avoided for work applications. Long live PaperWhite for pleasurable reading (and the Kindle read-text-aloud feature).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love PaperWhite. I prefer the e-Ink type of technology over the bright back-lit screen stuff that hurts my eyes. Though, those LED/plasma screen devices cannot be avoided for work applications. Long live PaperWhite for pleasurable reading (and the Kindle read-text-aloud feature).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/10/22/amazon-apparently-discontinues-kindle-touch-in-favor-of-paperwhite/#comment-165914</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 05:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=219385#comment-165914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, all the new Kindle Fires have the text-to-speech option, so that&#039;s 3 NEW models with TTS.  In addition, Amazon did not remove text-to-speech capabilities from &quot;its&quot; books, that function is set and governed by the publisher.  Please get the facts straight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, all the new Kindle Fires have the text-to-speech option, so that&#8217;s 3 NEW models with TTS.  In addition, Amazon did not remove text-to-speech capabilities from &#8220;its&#8221; books, that function is set and governed by the publisher.  Please get the facts straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/10/22/amazon-apparently-discontinues-kindle-touch-in-favor-of-paperwhite/#comment-165859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dawn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=219385#comment-165859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I messaged Amazon yesterday pretty upset because I found out that Best Buy had Paperwhites in stock and I preordered and still have not received mine. They upgraded me to 1 day shipping and waived the entire shipping cost, but I still think its wrong that big merchants are getting them in store before people who preordered! And now to hear that people don&#039;t even have the option to get a Kindle Touch to not have to wait, ridiculous!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I messaged Amazon yesterday pretty upset because I found out that Best Buy had Paperwhites in stock and I preordered and still have not received mine. They upgraded me to 1 day shipping and waived the entire shipping cost, but I still think its wrong that big merchants are getting them in store before people who preordered! And now to hear that people don&#8217;t even have the option to get a Kindle Touch to not have to wait, ridiculous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/10/22/amazon-apparently-discontinues-kindle-touch-in-favor-of-paperwhite/#comment-165765</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=219385#comment-165765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Touch was discontinued because it was the only model which had digitized text to speech.  The Authors Guild opposed it because they would rather sell you an Audio Book at $20.00 -$30.00, vs. the  $8.00 for the typical Kindle title.  

  I found this out because a family member had a stroke which limited her ability to read. This is a major setback for many of the visually impaired who depended on this feature to be able to read and who are low income and can&#039;t afford the higher priced Audio Books...  

  Amazon has also disabled the existing TTS ability on some of its books, but it is noted under the title notes whether the feature is enabled or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Touch was discontinued because it was the only model which had digitized text to speech.  The Authors Guild opposed it because they would rather sell you an Audio Book at $20.00 -$30.00, vs. the  $8.00 for the typical Kindle title.  </p>
<p>  I found this out because a family member had a stroke which limited her ability to read. This is a major setback for many of the visually impaired who depended on this feature to be able to read and who are low income and can&#8217;t afford the higher priced Audio Books&#8230;  </p>
<p>  Amazon has also disabled the existing TTS ability on some of its books, but it is noted under the title notes whether the feature is enabled or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
