<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where Europe&#8217;s subscribers are &#8212; and aren&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/11/21/where-europes-subscribers-are-and-arent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/11/21/where-europes-subscribers-are-and-arent/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:16:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Golebiewski</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/11/21/where-europes-subscribers-are-and-arent/#comment-176416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg Golebiewski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=221033#comment-176416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It should be added that the use of pay services is largely limited by cost (48%) but also by the lack of programs of interest (28%). 31% or three in ten Europeans would be prepared to pay for content perceived better, for example from other countries. Among those, slightly more would prefer to pay per view than pay a subscription (17% vs. 14%). 

Also of interest should be the fact that those who are willing to pay are likely to be the younger respondents (aged 15-24 years and 25-39 year olds), those in higher social groups and those who use the Internet every day. 

How does the paywall strategy fits into this? It does not. Once again, the data shows that people prefer on-demand systems, and that such systems are the future of paid content.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be added that the use of pay services is largely limited by cost (48%) but also by the lack of programs of interest (28%). 31% or three in ten Europeans would be prepared to pay for content perceived better, for example from other countries. Among those, slightly more would prefer to pay per view than pay a subscription (17% vs. 14%). </p>
<p>Also of interest should be the fact that those who are willing to pay are likely to be the younger respondents (aged 15-24 years and 25-39 year olds), those in higher social groups and those who use the Internet every day. </p>
<p>How does the paywall strategy fits into this? It does not. Once again, the data shows that people prefer on-demand systems, and that such systems are the future of paid content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bastard</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/11/21/where-europes-subscribers-are-and-arent/#comment-175977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bastard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=221033#comment-175977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is bull shit]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is bull shit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
