<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News Corp.&#8217;s The Daily is dead, long live The Daily?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/12/03/news-corp-s-the-daily-is-dead-long-live-the-daily/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/12/03/news-corp-s-the-daily-is-dead-long-live-the-daily/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:04:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: boing</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/12/03/news-corp-s-the-daily-is-dead-long-live-the-daily/#comment-181020</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 21:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=221483#comment-181020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for giving up, Rupert. It never made sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for giving up, Rupert. It never made sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rrreisman</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/12/03/news-corp-s-the-daily-is-dead-long-live-the-daily/#comment-180866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rrreisman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=221483#comment-180866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What we are seeing is the slow-motion death throes of an obsolete model for selling infinitely replicated content using a pricing model that assume replication is costly.  

Current new models like freemium and pay what you want point the way, but we really need to re-invent how we sell content in this new world of infinite replication. Selling apps was just a flash in the pan, with no basis in reality.  

As an example of the kind of radical re-thinking that is needed, consider the new view of commerce I have been suggesting called FairPay or Value2Me, that deeply exploits Internet economics and relationhip feedback. This treats content as an experience good, and makes prices correspond to individually perceived Value2Me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we are seeing is the slow-motion death throes of an obsolete model for selling infinitely replicated content using a pricing model that assume replication is costly.  </p>
<p>Current new models like freemium and pay what you want point the way, but we really need to re-invent how we sell content in this new world of infinite replication. Selling apps was just a flash in the pan, with no basis in reality.  </p>
<p>As an example of the kind of radical re-thinking that is needed, consider the new view of commerce I have been suggesting called FairPay or Value2Me, that deeply exploits Internet economics and relationhip feedback. This treats content as an experience good, and makes prices correspond to individually perceived Value2Me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
