<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can a &#8216;Spotify for books&#8217; really work?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/12/05/can-a-spotify-for-books-really-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/12/05/can-a-spotify-for-books-really-work/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:35:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna M</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/12/05/can-a-spotify-for-books-really-work/#comment-187599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anna M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=221666#comment-187599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BTW Kindle Owner Lending Library is a big disappointment - 1 title per MONTH and last I looked there were only 58 titles available.  That&#039;s pathetic - free public libraries with online lending can beat that any day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW Kindle Owner Lending Library is a big disappointment &#8211; 1 title per MONTH and last I looked there were only 58 titles available.  That&#8217;s pathetic &#8211; free public libraries with online lending can beat that any day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Wikert</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/12/05/can-a-spotify-for-books-really-work/#comment-183258</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Wikert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 17:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=221666#comment-183258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think we&#039;ll definitely see success in the &quot;Spotify for ebooks&quot; model. Don&#039;t forget that it took quite awhile for most consumers to even be interested in streaming music. We all wanted to own our content, myself included. These days though I can&#039;t tell you the last time I bought a track off iTunes but I can tell you that I fire up Spotify pretty regularly.

The content offering will determine success or failure here. Amazon chose to add what they could to Prime with the Kindle Owner Lending Library program. That&#039;s a nice add-on since the Prime rate didn&#039;t go up, but it&#039;s missing all sorts of content.

I tend to think it&#039;s best to focus on a specific genre. Don&#039;t just serve up a bunch of content. Build and serve the community as well. I&#039;m much more inclined to sign up for a subscription service featuring nothing but sports books than I would one where it&#039;s super broad and sports is just one small piece of it. The same goes for all the other genres that appeal to each of us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we&#8217;ll definitely see success in the &#8220;Spotify for ebooks&#8221; model. Don&#8217;t forget that it took quite awhile for most consumers to even be interested in streaming music. We all wanted to own our content, myself included. These days though I can&#8217;t tell you the last time I bought a track off iTunes but I can tell you that I fire up Spotify pretty regularly.</p>
<p>The content offering will determine success or failure here. Amazon chose to add what they could to Prime with the Kindle Owner Lending Library program. That&#8217;s a nice add-on since the Prime rate didn&#8217;t go up, but it&#8217;s missing all sorts of content.</p>
<p>I tend to think it&#8217;s best to focus on a specific genre. Don&#8217;t just serve up a bunch of content. Build and serve the community as well. I&#8217;m much more inclined to sign up for a subscription service featuring nothing but sports books than I would one where it&#8217;s super broad and sports is just one small piece of it. The same goes for all the other genres that appeal to each of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Briys</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/12/05/can-a-spotify-for-books-really-work/#comment-183179</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Briys]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=221666#comment-183179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It does exist in France www.smartlibris.com with a new roll out in Jan 2013 that will make it totally device agnostic. Smartlibris is born from www.scholarvox.com and www.bibliovox.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does exist in France <a href="http://www.smartlibris.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.smartlibris.com</a> with a new roll out in Jan 2013 that will make it totally device agnostic. Smartlibris is born from <a href="http://www.scholarvox.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.scholarvox.com</a> and <a href="http://www.bibliovox.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bibliovox.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Lamont</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/12/05/can-a-spotify-for-books-really-work/#comment-183157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Lamont]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=221666#comment-183157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting analysis, but PaidContent neglected to mention the interests of a critical constituency: The authors.

As an author of premium nonfiction ebooks (&quot;Dropbox In 30 Minutes&quot;, &quot;Google Drive &amp; Docs In 30 Minutes&quot;, &quot;Excel Basics In 30 Minutes&quot;, etc.) I&#039;m very concerned about any model that depends on free giveaways. For instance, the &quot;free days&quot; on Amazon&#039;s KDP Select have turned into a joke. The last time I looked, my single KDP Select title delivered an average of 1 cent per download from the KDP Select fund. That&#039;s about the same as many bands enjoy from Spotify each time someone plays one of their tracks, according to various sources.

I see from the linked article about Bookboard that the service is free during the public beta, and publishers are receiving nothing during this period. It&#039;s supposed to switch to paid in 2013, but it&#039;s not clear if it&#039;s a Spotify-style freemium model. There is also no detail about how much authors will get for their work. I suspect it isn&#039;t much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting analysis, but PaidContent neglected to mention the interests of a critical constituency: The authors.</p>
<p>As an author of premium nonfiction ebooks (&#8220;Dropbox In 30 Minutes&#8221;, &#8220;Google Drive &amp; Docs In 30 Minutes&#8221;, &#8220;Excel Basics In 30 Minutes&#8221;, etc.) I&#8217;m very concerned about any model that depends on free giveaways. For instance, the &#8220;free days&#8221; on Amazon&#8217;s KDP Select have turned into a joke. The last time I looked, my single KDP Select title delivered an average of 1 cent per download from the KDP Select fund. That&#8217;s about the same as many bands enjoy from Spotify each time someone plays one of their tracks, according to various sources.</p>
<p>I see from the linked article about Bookboard that the service is free during the public beta, and publishers are receiving nothing during this period. It&#8217;s supposed to switch to paid in 2013, but it&#8217;s not clear if it&#8217;s a Spotify-style freemium model. There is also no detail about how much authors will get for their work. I suspect it isn&#8217;t much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timo Boezeman</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/12/05/can-a-spotify-for-books-really-work/#comment-183031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Timo Boezeman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=221666#comment-183031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Thomas define music please. Spotify is doing better every year, and is probably going to be the number 1 revenue source very soon (now they&#039;re second, just behind iTunes). See for instance this article: http://techcrunch.com/2012/11/10/spotify-is-having-a-good-2012-revenues-could-reach-500m-as-it-expands-the-digital-music-market/.

And, we must not forget the probabilty that there might be less money to be made with selling digital media in comparison to physical media. Which, if that turns out to be the case, redefines what does work and what doesn&#039;t. That is relative. 

And, last but not least, Spotify turns out to be a (legal) alternative for piracy in music. So doing nothing (like that) at all, makes that you will lose money be keeping it the way you were doing already.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Thomas define music please. Spotify is doing better every year, and is probably going to be the number 1 revenue source very soon (now they&#8217;re second, just behind iTunes). See for instance this article: <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2012/11/10/spotify-is-having-a-good-2012-revenues-could-reach-500m-as-it-expands-the-digital-music-market/" rel="nofollow">http://techcrunch.com/2012/11/10/spotify-is-having-a-good-2012-revenues-could-reach-500m-as-it-expands-the-digital-music-market/</a>.</p>
<p>And, we must not forget the probabilty that there might be less money to be made with selling digital media in comparison to physical media. Which, if that turns out to be the case, redefines what does work and what doesn&#8217;t. That is relative. </p>
<p>And, last but not least, Spotify turns out to be a (legal) alternative for piracy in music. So doing nothing (like that) at all, makes that you will lose money be keeping it the way you were doing already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abbyhanson</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/12/05/can-a-spotify-for-books-really-work/#comment-183000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[abbyhanson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 11:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=221666#comment-183000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a stand alone offering Spotify books is an exciting prospect for; the student, academic and the curious.

If it’s true that you can get the gist of any non-fiction book by just reading the first five pages, then why own a non-fiction e-book?  As for fiction, would a Spotify book service benefit from building a sharing/referral capability to drive consumer take-up? Surely it’s a just a matter of time for an e-book access service model is &#039;successful&#039; (even if its focused on a niche such as academia). 

As for the supply-side, Is there an aggregration platform out there with a strong brand that enables &#039;non published/independent&#039; writers engage with their audiences?

My initial thought is: Spotify books would be an interesting product extension and added value for bundled propositions]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a stand alone offering Spotify books is an exciting prospect for; the student, academic and the curious.</p>
<p>If it’s true that you can get the gist of any non-fiction book by just reading the first five pages, then why own a non-fiction e-book?  As for fiction, would a Spotify book service benefit from building a sharing/referral capability to drive consumer take-up? Surely it’s a just a matter of time for an e-book access service model is &#8216;successful&#8217; (even if its focused on a niche such as academia). </p>
<p>As for the supply-side, Is there an aggregration platform out there with a strong brand that enables &#8216;non published/independent&#8217; writers engage with their audiences?</p>
<p>My initial thought is: Spotify books would be an interesting product extension and added value for bundled propositions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roos Geerse</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/12/05/can-a-spotify-for-books-really-work/#comment-182369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roos Geerse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 19:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=221666#comment-182369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see the royalty problem. You can pay publishers according to the number of pages that have been streamed/read/downloaded and then they can decide how to pay their authors, cant they?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see the royalty problem. You can pay publishers according to the number of pages that have been streamed/read/downloaded and then they can decide how to pay their authors, cant they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Baekdal</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/12/05/can-a-spotify-for-books-really-work/#comment-182247</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Baekdal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=221666#comment-182247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all, Spotify currently doesn&#039;t work for music. It&#039;s not a successful or even proven business model. Everyone is loosing money (including Spotify itself).

Secondly, a successful model already exists for audiobooks, called Audible subscriptions: http://www.audible.com/offers/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, Spotify currently doesn&#8217;t work for music. It&#8217;s not a successful or even proven business model. Everyone is loosing money (including Spotify itself).</p>
<p>Secondly, a successful model already exists for audiobooks, called Audible subscriptions: <a href="http://www.audible.com/offers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.audible.com/offers/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
