<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NYT public editor: Sometimes transparency triumphs over objectivity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/09/nyt-public-editor-sometimes-transparency-triumphs-over-objectivity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/09/nyt-public-editor-sometimes-transparency-triumphs-over-objectivity/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:35:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/09/nyt-public-editor-sometimes-transparency-triumphs-over-objectivity/#comment-196938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew Ingram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=223119#comment-196938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comment, Brian.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Brian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Baresch (@Editer)</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/09/nyt-public-editor-sometimes-transparency-triumphs-over-objectivity/#comment-196899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Baresch (@Editer)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=223119#comment-196899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed Ms. Sullivan&#039;s column is a small step -- as it should be. These incremental advances are certainly frustrating for those of us who, like Dr. Rosen, find the old institutions stifling. But it&#039;s easy to get your argument dismissed if it pushes too far too fast. Having seen how the journalistic establishment pushes back against these arguments, I support the slow approach because I believe it gets us farther in the end.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed Ms. Sullivan&#8217;s column is a small step &#8212; as it should be. These incremental advances are certainly frustrating for those of us who, like Dr. Rosen, find the old institutions stifling. But it&#8217;s easy to get your argument dismissed if it pushes too far too fast. Having seen how the journalistic establishment pushes back against these arguments, I support the slow approach because I believe it gets us farther in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
