<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disqus says web comments aren&#8217;t just popular &#8212; they&#8217;re a good business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/14/disqus-says-web-comments-arent-just-popular-theyre-a-good-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/14/disqus-says-web-comments-arent-just-popular-theyre-a-good-business/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 07:03:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chefsuz</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/14/disqus-says-web-comments-arent-just-popular-theyre-a-good-business/#comment-203293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chefsuz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 18:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=223166#comment-203293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So we readers are at the mercy of the publisher&#039;s discretion- or naivete? 

And Steve, what you are really saying when you offer your assurance that commenters can use a pseudonym, is that commenters had better use a pseudonym unless they don&#039;t mind Disqus mining their words for profit.

When commenting on a site that maintains ownership of its content instead of handing it over to a carpet-bagging comment system, we readers feel like we&#039;re part of a community, which is why we often don&#039;t mind using our names or offering a link to our own site. But how do we know, when commenting on a site that uses Disqus, whether or not the site has sold us out? Do we now avoid all Disqus commenting or do we have a separate identity that we use on a site using Disqus, just so we can keep Disqus from selling our identity along with our words?

While it&#039;s true that we&#039;re being sold out at almost every turn, I&#039;d really rather comment on a site&#039;s content without my own words being used for Disqus&#039; profit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So we readers are at the mercy of the publisher&#8217;s discretion- or naivete? </p>
<p>And Steve, what you are really saying when you offer your assurance that commenters can use a pseudonym, is that commenters had better use a pseudonym unless they don&#8217;t mind Disqus mining their words for profit.</p>
<p>When commenting on a site that maintains ownership of its content instead of handing it over to a carpet-bagging comment system, we readers feel like we&#8217;re part of a community, which is why we often don&#8217;t mind using our names or offering a link to our own site. But how do we know, when commenting on a site that uses Disqus, whether or not the site has sold us out? Do we now avoid all Disqus commenting or do we have a separate identity that we use on a site using Disqus, just so we can keep Disqus from selling our identity along with our words?</p>
<p>While it&#8217;s true that we&#8217;re being sold out at almost every turn, I&#8217;d really rather comment on a site&#8217;s content without my own words being used for Disqus&#8217; profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aj Sorenson</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/14/disqus-says-web-comments-arent-just-popular-theyre-a-good-business/#comment-202549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aj Sorenson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 15:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=223166#comment-202549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is BS!. Straight up BS!!! I&#039;ll be looking elsewhere for my commenting system.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is BS!. Straight up BS!!! I&#8217;ll be looking elsewhere for my commenting system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire Felton</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/14/disqus-says-web-comments-arent-just-popular-theyre-a-good-business/#comment-202405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Claire Felton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 03:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=223166#comment-202405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disqus comments can be good for people who are posting only if they get noticed from that comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disqus comments can be good for people who are posting only if they get noticed from that comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Roy</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/14/disqus-says-web-comments-arent-just-popular-theyre-a-good-business/#comment-197623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Roy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 22:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=223166#comment-197623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi. 

I head marketing and PR for Disqus. I just want to answer a few questions here. 

To confirm, we are sharing advertising revenue with publishers.  Publishers can turn off or adjust the discovery features any time they choose. 

On the privacy front, we enable commenters to use pseudonyms. It&#039;s a very common way that people choose to use Disqus. Using Disqus requires an email address, username and password. It&#039;s a very low barrier to participation for those who choose to do so. 

If anyone has more specific questions, send me an email: sroy@disqus.com

Thanks,
Steve]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. </p>
<p>I head marketing and PR for Disqus. I just want to answer a few questions here. </p>
<p>To confirm, we are sharing advertising revenue with publishers.  Publishers can turn off or adjust the discovery features any time they choose. </p>
<p>On the privacy front, we enable commenters to use pseudonyms. It&#8217;s a very common way that people choose to use Disqus. Using Disqus requires an email address, username and password. It&#8217;s a very low barrier to participation for those who choose to do so. </p>
<p>If anyone has more specific questions, send me an email: <a href="mailto:sroy@disqus.com">sroy@disqus.com</a></p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slateone</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/14/disqus-says-web-comments-arent-just-popular-theyre-a-good-business/#comment-197465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[slateone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=223166#comment-197465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, are they going to share the revenue with the content owners? ie. the people who post the comments.

Another case of content stealing (see the story about the Washington Post swiping Twitter photos).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, are they going to share the revenue with the content owners? ie. the people who post the comments.</p>
<p>Another case of content stealing (see the story about the Washington Post swiping Twitter photos).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: disqus</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/14/disqus-says-web-comments-arent-just-popular-theyre-a-good-business/#comment-197443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[disqus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=223166#comment-197443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did anyone mention that disqus just turned this on without even asking their users?  Terrible and unethical - sad what some companies do for quick money.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone mention that disqus just turned this on without even asking their users?  Terrible and unethical &#8211; sad what some companies do for quick money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kga245</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/14/disqus-says-web-comments-arent-just-popular-theyre-a-good-business/#comment-197364</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kga245]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=223166#comment-197364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@jim yes, that&#039;s what they claim.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jim yes, that&#8217;s what they claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Swartho</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/14/disqus-says-web-comments-arent-just-popular-theyre-a-good-business/#comment-197309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Swartho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 03:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=223166#comment-197309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[are they sharing the revenue with the content providers?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are they sharing the revenue with the content providers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kga245</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/14/disqus-says-web-comments-arent-just-popular-theyre-a-good-business/#comment-197285</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kga245]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 18:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=223166#comment-197285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disqus is a fine commenting product evidenced by their huge following. However describing their customer base as &quot;clients&quot; belies a finer point: one can call 2 million bloggers &quot;clients&quot; no more than one can call 60,000 followers &quot;friends.&quot; I think that Disqus, Livefyre and Facebook all fail to respond to the needs of publishers (i.e actual clients) in the following areas:

1. Who owns the data?
2. Who owns the user&#039;s account?

If the answers to those questions are not either the user or the publisher (ideally both), then they&#039;re giving the farm away. While initially revenue sharing on promoted content may seem like a good deal, over the long-term what publishers can do with their own data and what their users will increasingly demand for their own. 

The WSJ recently exposed whom the top 50 web sites share user data with. Not surprisingly, companies like Disqus are in the mix. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324640104578165651354042798.html 

Alternatively, choose Realtidbits or Echo for your social layer. They are the only true white-label providers intent on protecting information for both the consumer and the publisher.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disqus is a fine commenting product evidenced by their huge following. However describing their customer base as &#8220;clients&#8221; belies a finer point: one can call 2 million bloggers &#8220;clients&#8221; no more than one can call 60,000 followers &#8220;friends.&#8221; I think that Disqus, Livefyre and Facebook all fail to respond to the needs of publishers (i.e actual clients) in the following areas:</p>
<p>1. Who owns the data?<br />
2. Who owns the user&#8217;s account?</p>
<p>If the answers to those questions are not either the user or the publisher (ideally both), then they&#8217;re giving the farm away. While initially revenue sharing on promoted content may seem like a good deal, over the long-term what publishers can do with their own data and what their users will increasingly demand for their own. </p>
<p>The WSJ recently exposed whom the top 50 web sites share user data with. Not surprisingly, companies like Disqus are in the mix. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324640104578165651354042798.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324640104578165651354042798.html</a> </p>
<p>Alternatively, choose Realtidbits or Echo for your social layer. They are the only true white-label providers intent on protecting information for both the consumer and the publisher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myriad O'Truble</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/14/disqus-says-web-comments-arent-just-popular-theyre-a-good-business/#comment-197219</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Myriad O'Truble]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=223166#comment-197219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disqus comments are good business for whom?  For businesses who like to track comments and sell them for political and other questionable purposes. Disqus should scare us all. It&#039;s just another way they are tracking everything about you.  Disqus is like a plague.  An infection that&#039;s spreading anti-privacy disease all over the internet.  Discus is fungus.  Take Discus off your sites before it turns your readers to stone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disqus comments are good business for whom?  For businesses who like to track comments and sell them for political and other questionable purposes. Disqus should scare us all. It&#8217;s just another way they are tracking everything about you.  Disqus is like a plague.  An infection that&#8217;s spreading anti-privacy disease all over the internet.  Discus is fungus.  Take Discus off your sites before it turns your readers to stone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
