<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News companies must pay for swiping Twitter pics (but our photo laws are still a mess)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/16/news-companies-must-pay-for-swiping-twitter-pics-but-our-photo-laws-are-still-a-mess/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/16/news-companies-must-pay-for-swiping-twitter-pics-but-our-photo-laws-are-still-a-mess/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:14:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willem Reyners Tay</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/16/news-companies-must-pay-for-swiping-twitter-pics-but-our-photo-laws-are-still-a-mess/#comment-197888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Willem Reyners Tay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=223318#comment-197888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Makes me glad we have a more robust Fair Dealing clause in our copyright system here in Australia]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes me glad we have a more robust Fair Dealing clause in our copyright system here in Australia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
