<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Random House&#8217;s new Facebook app: If you liked Evelyn Waugh, you&#8217;ll love the Berenstain Bears</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/21/random-houses-new-facebook-app-if-you-liked-evelyn-waugh-youll-love-the-berenstain-bears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/21/random-houses-new-facebook-app-if-you-liked-evelyn-waugh-youll-love-the-berenstain-bears/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thomas</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/21/random-houses-new-facebook-app-if-you-liked-evelyn-waugh-youll-love-the-berenstain-bears/#comment-197836</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Thomas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=223446#comment-197836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is so much of this single experience that points to far too much faith in data that is informally collected. Services like Pandora often fail me as well -- but I think with books there is an additional issue of a very high percentage of title metadata that is far too idiosyncratic. Its &quot;only cool if it works,&quot; yet even the best programming will ultimately suck because of the data it relies on -- garbage in, garbage out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is so much of this single experience that points to far too much faith in data that is informally collected. Services like Pandora often fail me as well &#8212; but I think with books there is an additional issue of a very high percentage of title metadata that is far too idiosyncratic. Its &#8220;only cool if it works,&#8221; yet even the best programming will ultimately suck because of the data it relies on &#8212; garbage in, garbage out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
