<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HuffPo&#8217;s new &#8216;Conversations&#8217; will improve comments &#8212; and make money for AOL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/28/blah-blah-blah-huffpos-new-conversations-will-improve-comments-and-make-money-for-aol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/28/blah-blah-blah-huffpos-new-conversations-will-improve-comments-and-make-money-for-aol/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:19:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cas127</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/28/blah-blah-blah-huffpos-new-conversations-will-improve-comments-and-make-money-for-aol/#comment-201415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cas127]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 22:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=223736#comment-201415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an article waiting to be written about trying to reverse engineer HuffPo&#039;s vastly disproportionate popularity.

It isn&#039;t like there aren&#039;t other aggregators around...

...or celebrity driven sites...

...or internet coffee klatches...

And plenty of sites combine all three too.

Is it the badges?  (Who needs those stinking badges?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an article waiting to be written about trying to reverse engineer HuffPo&#8217;s vastly disproportionate popularity.</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t like there aren&#8217;t other aggregators around&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;or celebrity driven sites&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;or internet coffee klatches&#8230;</p>
<p>And plenty of sites combine all three too.</p>
<p>Is it the badges?  (Who needs those stinking badges?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jccourt</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/28/blah-blah-blah-huffpos-new-conversations-will-improve-comments-and-make-money-for-aol/#comment-199605</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jccourt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 21:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=223736#comment-199605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know the comment section at the Huffington post. It worked fairly well. Upon encountering the new so called conversation section, it was instant dislike. Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the comment section at the Huffington post. It worked fairly well. Upon encountering the new so called conversation section, it was instant dislike. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: comment account</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/01/28/blah-blah-blah-huffpos-new-conversations-will-improve-comments-and-make-money-for-aol/#comment-198474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[comment account]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=223736#comment-198474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forums for articles instead of one thread.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forums for articles instead of one thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
