<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital First Media is working on paywalls, even though it really doesn&#8217;t want to</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/04/digital-first-media-is-working-on-paywalls-even-though-it-really-doesnt-want-to/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/04/digital-first-media-is-working-on-paywalls-even-though-it-really-doesnt-want-to/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:38:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Smith</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/04/digital-first-media-is-working-on-paywalls-even-though-it-really-doesnt-want-to/#comment-201090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 05:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=224107#comment-201090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still believe that John Paton and many others have clung to the &quot;newspapers are dead&quot; mantra so long that they are bent on making it a self-fulfilling prophesy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still believe that John Paton and many others have clung to the &#8220;newspapers are dead&#8221; mantra so long that they are bent on making it a self-fulfilling prophesy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hoover</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/04/digital-first-media-is-working-on-paywalls-even-though-it-really-doesnt-want-to/#comment-199201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Hoover]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 20:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=224107#comment-199201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So John Paton is investing time, resources and credibility into something he doesn&#039;t believe in and says doesn&#039;t work. Genius.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So John Paton is investing time, resources and credibility into something he doesn&#8217;t believe in and says doesn&#8217;t work. Genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale A. Duncan</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/04/digital-first-media-is-working-on-paywalls-even-though-it-really-doesnt-want-to/#comment-199173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dale A. Duncan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=224107#comment-199173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He doesn&#039;t want to do it because he knows his content is terrible and he will have to pay money to improve it to be successful with a metered model.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He doesn&#8217;t want to do it because he knows his content is terrible and he will have to pay money to improve it to be successful with a metered model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Stanger</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/04/digital-first-media-is-working-on-paywalls-even-though-it-really-doesnt-want-to/#comment-199151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Stanger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=224107#comment-199151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oldnewspaperman, is Rosen really hedging anything?  I think he writes an accurate account of what&#039;s going on. I particularly like this quote: &quot;Digitally, the original sin wasn’t failing to charge when the first news sites came online; it was re-purposing the old platform’s material.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oldnewspaperman, is Rosen really hedging anything?  I think he writes an accurate account of what&#8217;s going on. I particularly like this quote: &#8220;Digitally, the original sin wasn’t failing to charge when the first news sites came online; it was re-purposing the old platform’s material.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JayRosen</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/04/digital-first-media-is-working-on-paywalls-even-though-it-really-doesnt-want-to/#comment-199147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JayRosen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 15:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=224107#comment-199147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really? I&#039;m hedging my bets? I did not know that, &quot;oldnewspaperman.&quot; But I am open to persuasion. Which bets did you have in mind?  

Had I placed a bet that &quot;editing by click rate&quot; was wise, ethically sound and would lead to success? Where did I do so? Because I cannot recall saying anything like that. Had I bet that online advertising would equal the lost revenues from the decline of print? I can&#039;t recall ever saying -- or believing -- that so you&#039;ll have to help me with where I placed that bet. Got a link or something? Had I somewhere signed on to the proposition that you CAN &quot;cut your way to the future?&quot; If so, I am not aware it. Did I claim that bloggers and citizen journalists CAN fill the gap when there are fewer journalists at the capital or city hall watching what goes on? I&#039;m quite sure I never made that claim, but if you say I did... any evidence?

If these are not the bets I made that I am now, according to you, hedging, which ones did you have in mind, &quot;oldnewspaperman.&quot; 

Sincerely
Jay Rosen
http://pressthink.org]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? I&#8217;m hedging my bets? I did not know that, &#8220;oldnewspaperman.&#8221; But I am open to persuasion. Which bets did you have in mind?  </p>
<p>Had I placed a bet that &#8220;editing by click rate&#8221; was wise, ethically sound and would lead to success? Where did I do so? Because I cannot recall saying anything like that. Had I bet that online advertising would equal the lost revenues from the decline of print? I can&#8217;t recall ever saying &#8212; or believing &#8212; that so you&#8217;ll have to help me with where I placed that bet. Got a link or something? Had I somewhere signed on to the proposition that you CAN &#8220;cut your way to the future?&#8221; If so, I am not aware it. Did I claim that bloggers and citizen journalists CAN fill the gap when there are fewer journalists at the capital or city hall watching what goes on? I&#8217;m quite sure I never made that claim, but if you say I did&#8230; any evidence?</p>
<p>If these are not the bets I made that I am now, according to you, hedging, which ones did you have in mind, &#8220;oldnewspaperman.&#8221; </p>
<p>Sincerely<br />
Jay Rosen<br />
<a href="http://pressthink.org" rel="nofollow">http://pressthink.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldnewspaperman</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/04/digital-first-media-is-working-on-paywalls-even-though-it-really-doesnt-want-to/#comment-199103</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[oldnewspaperman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 05:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=224107#comment-199103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have to believe Paton is on a short clock to turn things around. His &quot;stacking digital dimes&quot; mantra was a fantasy. Now even his Thunderdome consultants are hedging their bets.

http://pressthink.org/2013/02/look-youre-right-okay-but-youre-also-wrong/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to believe Paton is on a short clock to turn things around. His &#8220;stacking digital dimes&#8221; mantra was a fantasy. Now even his Thunderdome consultants are hedging their bets.</p>
<p><a href="http://pressthink.org/2013/02/look-youre-right-okay-but-youre-also-wrong/" rel="nofollow">http://pressthink.org/2013/02/look-youre-right-okay-but-youre-also-wrong/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
