<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times plugs big leak in paywall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/11/new-york-times-plugs-big-leak-in-paywall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/11/new-york-times-plugs-big-leak-in-paywall/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:38:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cas127</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/11/new-york-times-plugs-big-leak-in-paywall/#comment-201393</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cas127]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 15:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=224523#comment-201393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I noticed reading articles on cn.nytimes doesn’t add to the article count.&quot;

I&#039;ve noticed the same thing for various NYT &quot;blogs&quot; (and the line between NYT &quot;blog&quot; and NYT proper is often so vague as to be non-existent...) - basically there is no meter for many NYT &quot;blogs&quot;.

The NYT is still playing games - trying to maximize digital subscription revenue (opaquely reported in 10K&#039;s and 10Q&#039;s) while capturing the &quot;drive-by&quot; reader who they need to maximize monthly &quot;uniques&quot; and page views - the base currency of online advertising.

Keep holding the NYT&#039;s feet to the reporting fire - they are being as deceptive and manipulative in this regard as any journalistic subject they condemn daily.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I noticed reading articles on cn.nytimes doesn’t add to the article count.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed the same thing for various NYT &#8220;blogs&#8221; (and the line between NYT &#8220;blog&#8221; and NYT proper is often so vague as to be non-existent&#8230;) &#8211; basically there is no meter for many NYT &#8220;blogs&#8221;.</p>
<p>The NYT is still playing games &#8211; trying to maximize digital subscription revenue (opaquely reported in 10K&#8217;s and 10Q&#8217;s) while capturing the &#8220;drive-by&#8221; reader who they need to maximize monthly &#8220;uniques&#8221; and page views &#8211; the base currency of online advertising.</p>
<p>Keep holding the NYT&#8217;s feet to the reporting fire &#8211; they are being as deceptive and manipulative in this regard as any journalistic subject they condemn daily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Stadum</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/11/new-york-times-plugs-big-leak-in-paywall/#comment-200372</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Stadum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=224523#comment-200372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And now it seems that the NYT has for all practical purposes abandoned the metered model in favor of an old-fashioned 99¢ subscription model with the 10 free article offer relegated to a footnote, in effect, in the FAQ.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now it seems that the NYT has for all practical purposes abandoned the metered model in favor of an old-fashioned 99¢ subscription model with the 10 free article offer relegated to a footnote, in effect, in the FAQ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/11/new-york-times-plugs-big-leak-in-paywall/#comment-199959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=224523#comment-199959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I noticed reading articles on cn.nytimes doesn&#039;t add to the article count.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed reading articles on cn.nytimes doesn&#8217;t add to the article count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Henninger</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/11/new-york-times-plugs-big-leak-in-paywall/#comment-199769</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Henninger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=224523#comment-199769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m gonna bury the Gray Lady. She&#039;s dead to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m gonna bury the Gray Lady. She&#8217;s dead to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/11/new-york-times-plugs-big-leak-in-paywall/#comment-199741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=224523#comment-199741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paywalls are an attempt to relocate the newspaper&#039;s problem so it becomes the reader&#039;s problem. Surely newspapers can come up with a more customer-friendly solution than that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paywalls are an attempt to relocate the newspaper&#8217;s problem so it becomes the reader&#8217;s problem. Surely newspapers can come up with a more customer-friendly solution than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reddittotherescue</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/11/new-york-times-plugs-big-leak-in-paywall/#comment-199738</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reddittotherescue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=224523#comment-199738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To get around the new pay wall:
Open your hosts file, find the entry that reads 127.0.0.1. Add this to the end of that line:
meter-svc.nytimes.com
Don&#039;t delete anything from the line, just add this string at the end.
Restart your browser or clear the cache. Viola, unfettered access.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To get around the new pay wall:<br />
Open your hosts file, find the entry that reads 127.0.0.1. Add this to the end of that line:<br />
meter-svc.nytimes.com<br />
Don&#8217;t delete anything from the line, just add this string at the end.<br />
Restart your browser or clear the cache. Viola, unfettered access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Statspotting</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/11/new-york-times-plugs-big-leak-in-paywall/#comment-199720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Statspotting]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=224523#comment-199720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The paywall has been a very successful move by all standards. It is now more than 12 percent of overall subscription revenue, which is huge if you consider how much of a concern these &#039;leaks&#039; were when the paywall first launched.

http://statspotting.com/nyt-paywall-statistics-12-percent-of-total-subscription-sales-this-year/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The paywall has been a very successful move by all standards. It is now more than 12 percent of overall subscription revenue, which is huge if you consider how much of a concern these &#8216;leaks&#8217; were when the paywall first launched.</p>
<p><a href="http://statspotting.com/nyt-paywall-statistics-12-percent-of-total-subscription-sales-this-year/" rel="nofollow">http://statspotting.com/nyt-paywall-statistics-12-percent-of-total-subscription-sales-this-year/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
