<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Times backs AP in lawsuit against news collector Meltwater</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/26/new-york-times-backs-ap-in-lawsuit-against-news-collector-meltwater/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/26/new-york-times-backs-ap-in-lawsuit-against-news-collector-meltwater/</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 12:47:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff John Roberts</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/26/new-york-times-backs-ap-in-lawsuit-against-news-collector-meltwater/#comment-200971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff John Roberts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=225143#comment-200971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark, I can add France to the mix -- Le Monde and Le Figaro are not exactly innovative on the digital front. The UK, Ireland and parts of eastern Europe appear further along.

godzilla, yes, the issue is monetization. You&#039;re right that it&#039;s a logical business decision to protect print earnings -- but, as you point out, this is a delay tactic not a strategy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I can add France to the mix &#8212; Le Monde and Le Figaro are not exactly innovative on the digital front. The UK, Ireland and parts of eastern Europe appear further along.</p>
<p>godzilla, yes, the issue is monetization. You&#8217;re right that it&#8217;s a logical business decision to protect print earnings &#8212; but, as you point out, this is a delay tactic not a strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/26/new-york-times-backs-ap-in-lawsuit-against-news-collector-meltwater/#comment-200961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=225143#comment-200961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s only fair to say that if you can back it up.    Belgium ?  Norway ?  Hardly European powerhouses.      I also do not understand how demanding that search engines pay for piggybacking off content that&#039;s not theirs is somehow contrary to having a digitizing strategy unless what you mean by &quot;digitizing&quot; is giving away your content for free ?      Given the brand you work for I assume not ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s only fair to say that if you can back it up.    Belgium ?  Norway ?  Hardly European powerhouses.      I also do not understand how demanding that search engines pay for piggybacking off content that&#8217;s not theirs is somehow contrary to having a digitizing strategy unless what you mean by &#8220;digitizing&#8221; is giving away your content for free ?      Given the brand you work for I assume not ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: godzilla</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/26/new-york-times-backs-ap-in-lawsuit-against-news-collector-meltwater/#comment-200959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[godzilla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 08:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=225143#comment-200959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It doesn&#039;t appear as if the difficulty lies in digitizing traditional newspaper content.  The difficulty is more likely in monetizing such digitization efforts and it doesn&#039;t sound as if North American newspapers businesses have found a way to effectively monetize their efforts digitally either.  So perhaps not digitizing is a business decision to protect their businesses, albeit a non-proactive delay tactic?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t appear as if the difficulty lies in digitizing traditional newspaper content.  The difficulty is more likely in monetizing such digitization efforts and it doesn&#8217;t sound as if North American newspapers businesses have found a way to effectively monetize their efforts digitally either.  So perhaps not digitizing is a business decision to protect their businesses, albeit a non-proactive delay tactic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff John Roberts</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/26/new-york-times-backs-ap-in-lawsuit-against-news-collector-meltwater/#comment-200916</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff John Roberts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=225143#comment-200916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your comment, Mark. My remark is subjective but is based on my experiences in Europe where print appears to still be widely prevalent. It&#039;s also based on conversations with journalists in Belgium, Norway and other countries who regularly tell me their publications don&#039;t even have a digital strategy at all. I can also point to EU countries&#039; repeated efforts to wring copyright royalties from Google to prop up their newspapers.

Europe has many wonderful news brands. But I think it&#039;s fair to say its digitize efforts are lagging North America.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, Mark. My remark is subjective but is based on my experiences in Europe where print appears to still be widely prevalent. It&#8217;s also based on conversations with journalists in Belgium, Norway and other countries who regularly tell me their publications don&#8217;t even have a digital strategy at all. I can also point to EU countries&#8217; repeated efforts to wring copyright royalties from Google to prop up their newspapers.</p>
<p>Europe has many wonderful news brands. But I think it&#8217;s fair to say its digitize efforts are lagging North America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/26/new-york-times-backs-ap-in-lawsuit-against-news-collector-meltwater/#comment-200906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=225143#comment-200906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is your basis for claiming that   &quot;Europe’s attempts to digitize the news business..... are already trailing North America by a wide margin.&quot;  ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is your basis for claiming that   &#8220;Europe’s attempts to digitize the news business&#8230;.. are already trailing North America by a wide margin.&#8221;  ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/26/new-york-times-backs-ap-in-lawsuit-against-news-collector-meltwater/#comment-200904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=225143#comment-200904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Masnick is a big freeloader himself. While his blog has more original content than others, he&#039;s never, ever supported the hard working artists. He&#039;s just a flack for the billionaires who don&#039;t want to share anything with the people who do the work. That&#039;s why Google was so happy to support his bogus future of journalism conference. Needless to say, it was just a bunch of Google share holders hoping that they could keep the freeloading going as long as possible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Masnick is a big freeloader himself. While his blog has more original content than others, he&#8217;s never, ever supported the hard working artists. He&#8217;s just a flack for the billionaires who don&#8217;t want to share anything with the people who do the work. That&#8217;s why Google was so happy to support his bogus future of journalism conference. Needless to say, it was just a bunch of Google share holders hoping that they could keep the freeloading going as long as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
