http://paidcontent.org/2013/03/05/washington-post-steps-into-sponsored-posts-with-a-new-platform-brandconnect/ The economics of digital content Mon, 20 May 2013 06:12:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://paidcontent.org/2013/03/05/washington-post-steps-into-sponsored-posts-with-a-new-platform-brandconnect/#comment-202355 Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:40:07 +0000 http://paidcontent.org/?p=225488#comment-202355 Was this post sponsored by the Paid Content conference? (And, more seriously, will the panel you mention be streamed for those of us who can’t be in NY that day?)

]]> http://paidcontent.org/2013/03/05/washington-post-steps-into-sponsored-posts-with-a-new-platform-brandconnect/#comment-201294 Tue, 05 Mar 2013 22:22:44 +0000 http://paidcontent.org/?p=225488#comment-201294 If you’re the same Nate that wrote that ill-informed blog post this morning, you’re of course well aware that the particular post you mention here was an unpaid guest post. If you’re not the same Nate, you should understand that this particular post was an unpaid guest post, and any content that is sponsored is always clearly labeled.

]]> http://paidcontent.org/2013/03/05/washington-post-steps-into-sponsored-posts-with-a-new-platform-brandconnect/#comment-201262 Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:51:01 +0000 http://paidcontent.org/?p=225488#comment-201262 I hope GigaOm studies the WP’s methods and copies the better ones. At this point there’s no clear indicator on the posts that GigaOm sells to advertisers. This one, for example:
http://gigaom.com/2013/03/03/browsing-the-web-on-an-ipad-stinks-and-apple-likes-it-that-way/

]]>