Analyst Says Hulu To Match YouTube’s U.S. Revenue In 2009: We Say, Maybe Not

The war between Google’s YouTube and NBCU/News Corp.‘s Hulu continues to escalate—as some analysts are pegging Hulu to catch YouTube in terms of revenue next year. In an FT.com article, Screen Digest analyst Arash Amel predicts that YouTube will generate about $100 million worth of U.S. revenue this year, to Hulu’s $70 million. But by the end of next year, both video sites will generate about $180 million in revenues in the U.S. alone. Not bad for Hulu, which launched just eight months ago, but for YouTube, it’s seemingly just one more reason for Google (NSDQ: GOOG) shareholders to bang the “we need revenue” drum harder. According to Amel: “YouTube is in a very tough place right now. Most of that user-generated content is worthless or illegal. The next 18 months will determine whether or not it was just an expensive mistake for Google.”
The caveat is that the source of Amel’s predictions are a bit unfounded, as neither company releases its ad revenue data. Some, like Valleywag’s Paul Boutin argue that the figures are part of a promotional stunt. Mediamemo digs deeper into the details: Amel believes Hulu is already trumping YouTube when it comes to profits. He estimates that Hulu is bringing in about $12 million per year after everything’s all paid for—while YouTube continues to hemorrhage money each year.
Rafat adds: While YouTube certainly needs to step up its content monetization efforts, and its fits-and-starts efforts have been well documented before, I have continued doubts about Hulu’s claims, or proxy claims by others about how “successful” it is: firstly, six months of traffic growth doesn’t make anyone a success. Secondly, the company’s claims about 100 advertisers seems to always be undercut by tons of PSA ads, or the lack of ads in general on Hulu. I am a big consumer of Hulu video of all stripes, and I see more PSA ads than actual paid ads, so 80 percent sell through estimates by Screen Digest have to be taken with a big lump of salt.
Thirdly, how the Hulu deal works is that the site owns the inventory, so if JV partners Fox or NBCU want to sell ads across their own content, they have to buy it back. That’s maybe what’s giving bulk to Hulu’s revenues for now, but I would not be surprised if that deal term gets changed a year down the line. I have already heard rumblings of Fox Network people not being happy about Hulu, and how much exposure NBCU’s shows are getting through Hulu, as opposed to their own. So while the world’s gaga over Hulu for now, the real test is the actual revenues and the sustainability as a JV long term.
Posted In: Advertising, Technologies / Formats, Broadband, Companies, Google, YouTube, NBC Universal, News Corp., hulu
Comments (7)
Nov 17, 2008 4:52 PM
“Foreign languages…Biology!!” lol
Nov 17, 2008 5:06 PM
Fox’s whining sounds a bit duplicitous in this case.
Hulu seems to feature those shows that are getting constantly updated new material.
Additional old material gets a show featured more due to people continuing to enjoy a popular episode or what not.
Fox does two things that I don’t see NBC doing that hurt them in that regard. they don’t seem to be putting as many shows up. And those shows that they do put up often have episodes that expire from the site after a certain period. I discovered that after missing a couple of shows for a few weeks and realized that they were gone when I tried to go watch them.
The Sci Fi channel does the same things, and one ups it by also delaying the release of episodes online by a week more so that the content is stale by the time it shows up. I’ve already watched it through other, uhm, ‘methods’ by that time.
Of course the quality of the content has a lot to do with it too. If you show isn’t clicked on as much as other shows of course it is going to drop down the list when people view the popular shows page which is typically the best way to find something interesting on the site.
Oh, and not only have I seen more of those PSA commercials lately there has been a distinct uptick in those “THIS SHOW WAS BROUGHT TO YOU BY HULU’S ADVERTISERS” non commercials that pop up when no one has sponsored something.
Nov 17, 2008 8:05 PM
While the hulu’s interface is nice…no video site beats Youtube’s fast load time.
By the way, have you noticed that the page refreshes at paidcontent distsurb the user experience? Try watching a an embedded video and see how the page refresh dosrients the user… the video disappears and you have to scroll again to find where you were.
Nov 17, 2008 8:13 PM
Thanks for your note, Carter. We’ve changed the refresh time so there shouldn’t be disruptions anymore.
Nov 18, 2008 12:48 AM
Fuck the hulu mulu, you tube is #1. Goog rocks. Hulu sucks.
Jan 10, 2009 3:27 AM
There is no match hulu to youtube. youtube is best.
May 2, 2009 12:11 PM
hulu is not you tube it,s not possible