The Guardian
topics
Close Box

News From Us:

Our latest report; our new video section; and jobs with paidContent.org and paidContent:UK


@ Digital Hollywood: Can The TV Industry Survive The Online Video Boom?

imageWill online video kill the TV star? That’s the question panelists tried to answer during the Video Advertising panel at Digital Hollywood. “The TV and movie industries have a value chain—grips, actors, screenwriters, etc. What do we do in our industry so it doesn’t get decimated like it has with newspapers or music?” asked Steve Robinson, president of video ad firm Panache.

Responses varied, of course, but the consensus was that there was no way the TV industry would survive in its current form: 

The least optimistic was Kevin Yen, YouTube’s director of strategic partnerships: “Industries evolve, there’s consolidation and things change. We need to develop the economics that support this current model. We can’t take the perspective that there’s a big pot of gold at the end of the rainbow that rewards this [legacy] structure.”

“We’re still applying TV metrics on the cost side to the Web, and that’s never going to work,” said Nada Stirratt, MTV’s EVP of digital advertising. “We need to actually look at the investments we’re making in web originals, look at the level of engagement they get, and value them accurately.”

“It’s taken a long time, but we’re shifting at NBC so that the TV content we produce can automatically get repurposed for the web,” said Mark Marvel, senior director of video monetization for msnbc.com. “We’re trying to get more out of our existing talent and burn through less resources, I think you’ll see more of that happening across the board—with smaller Upfronts, more pilots being sent right to the web, etc.” 

“We’re spending too much time trying to figure out what model is going to work, when it’s clear that we just need to be better at following consumers.” said Jason Forbes, group SVP of strategy, new products & marketing at Time Warner (NYSE: TWX) Cable Media Sales. “If we don’t, we’re just going to lose the revenue—like the music industry and Napster (NSDQ: NAPS), or like newspapers in their attempts to catch up online.”

Photo Credit: Flickr

May 5, 2009 3:35 PM ET
Share

Posted In: Advertising, Technologies / Formats, Broadband

  • Jeff

    “We’re trying to get more out of our existing talent and burn through less resources"... apparently by not paying the actors for their appearances on the web if the new deal with SAG goes through….

    Videopoet, "The future is the re-editing of tv material, mashing it up, putting it to music in places, putting advertising into the mash…"  That's what the smut business has been doing for 14 years on the web and even before the with movies and cable… one shoot has 15 cuts for different markets… it's time NBC and the rest caught up with that.

  • The future is the re-editing of tv material, mashing it up, putting it to music in places, putting advertising into the mash. Beyond that is re-edited relaunched movies…New soundtracks, film fusions…

  • drew robertson

    Back of the envelope math.  111m HUTs.  TV revenues (network, syndie, local, etc) of $70-100b.  That's about $750 per HUT that could be going away.  There's no way Google search ads on YouTube or PSAs on Hulu or FLO will replace that.

The Economics of Content | paidContent Newsletter

Know something we don’t?

Send Us a News Tip

All tips are anonymous and untraced.

Sponsors

Contributors