The Guardian
topics
Close Box

News From Us:

Our latest report; our new video section; and jobs with paidContent.org and paidContent:UK


ESPN The Magazine To Charge For Content Online

imageESPN The Magazine becomes the latest print publication to try charging for its content online. The magazine announced on its website Friday that its online version, ESPNTheMag.com, was merging with the ESPN (NYSE: DIS) Insider service, which charges $39.95 a year for specialized sports content. “As of Friday June 5, ESPNTheMag.com ceased to exist as we know it, but the site’s signature pieces and voice continue to live on the Insider page,” the magazine alerts visitors. (Print subscribers can continue to access magazine articles via the Insider for free).

ESPN Publishing general manager Gary Hoenig tells Business Week that it is a move other publishers should make as well.  “Why is it, in this business, we are apologetic when asking [consumers] to pay for what we give them online?” he asks. “It’s not like people in the milk business who think ‘we should give it away for free—we can make money on the cartons.’” But it’s also not as much of a risk for ESPN as it might be for other publications. The magazine’s website never seems to have brought in that much traffic. (Compete.com says it attracted about 40,000 unique visitors in April). And ESPN can also have it both ways since almost all of the content on its main site, ESPN.com, is accessible without an Insider subscription. The Insider service, which reportedly already had 350,000 paying subscribers, however, could potentially see a boost in membership.

Staci adds: ESPN Insider and ESPN the Mag have been related from the online service’s start. A print subscription was—and still is—included with every Insider subscription. It instantly created a tangible value for Insider subscribers, upped and adding the cost of the magazine in to the equation, made the online service more attractive—at least, to this initial Insider subscriber. Does this move marginalize the magazine? Only if ESPN can’t figure out how to promote the content outside of the subscription service and if there’s one thing ESPN knows other than sports, it’s promotion.

Related Stories
Jun 5, 2009 4:00 PM ET

espnmag cover

Share

Posted In: Media & Publishing, Companies, Disney, ESPN

  • J.C. Lettow

    Approximately two weeks ago, I subscribed for "Content Magazine."  I did this for my Wife who NOW informs me a "number" was included in Ladies Home Journal advertisement.

    I am a bit confused, (Typical for a Male,) but I saw the comment "CHARGE" while I was on the net. This should not affect us as we made our request 14 days earlier. PLEASE RESPOND TO; gunnyjc@cox.net; Thank You!

    J.C. Lettow
    Former Gunnery Sergeant, USMC
    gunnyjc@cox.net

  • patricia

    Please. Everybody should be thinking about charging for their content. What media outlet in traditional form ever gave away quality content for free? Nothing's changed in the world, just the platform. Good content costs money and with every other platform out there, people have been willing to pay for it. Why do anything different?

    One thing worth noting - ESPN was one of the first to also cut loose ad network and start selling ads on its own, if memory serves. That, and paid content, are smart moves. Nobody will realize it for a while, but later, for sure.

  • Most of the publications today are thinking of charging fee for their content.  No doubt that ESPN is considering this move.  In this way, fees would be a great help for their operation.

The Economics of Content | paidContent Newsletter

Know something we don’t?

Send Us a News Tip

All tips are anonymous and untraced.

Sponsors

Contributors