Google Thumbnails Is Fair Use: Court; Google New “Universal” Search
Google’s image search results don’t constitute direct infringement when copyrighted images show up in the results, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled today, reports IP Democracy. Long story short: an adult company Perfect 10 sued Google on showing thumbnails, and after district court ruled against Google, the appeals court reversed some parts of the lower court’s decision, but more importantly it found that Google’s image search didn’t violate Perfect 10’s copyright, even though Google reproduced entirely, albeit in thumbnail format, Perfect 10’s photos.
The main language in the decision: “In this case, Google has put Perfect 10’s thumbnail images (along with millions of other thumbnail images) to a use fundamentally different than the use intended by Perfect 10. In doing so, Google has provided a significant benefit to the public. Weighing this significant transformative use against the unproven use of Google’s thumbnails for cell phone downloads, and considering the other fair use factors, all in light of the purpose of copyright, we conclude that Google’s use of Perfect 10’s thumbnails is a fair use.” Full decision here.
In related news, Google has merged the results of it disparate search services, such as books, YouTube videos and Google’s local shopping information, and will now present them in the main results, a move it calls “universal search”. It is also making other search enhacements: it will soon improve how its search engine discerns the meaning of a query, as in whether someone searching for “AB” means Alberta or air base. Full list of enhancements is here. Also read: “Google sets spotlight on videos”
Posted In: Legal, Regulatory, Search, Technologies / Formats, Companies, Google
Comments (2)
May 17, 2007 7:36 AM
I think they are doing the right thing, can you image when google knows every little secret about you? that really scare me off :(
———————————-
Software Download
http://www.usdownload.net/
May 17, 2007 5:53 PM
There’s a bigger story in this new opinion—which is that the court held that Google can be liable for copyright infringement if it knows that its search results link to third party sites that infringe on copyrighted content. This gives even more force to the so-called “takedown notices” that copyright holders send under the DMCA. Once Google has that notice, they will have to promptly pull those sites from their index. And if Google is selling Adsense ads on an infringing site, that’s even worse.
This is where it gets interesting. Watch for Google to take this one up to the Supreme Court.