The Guardian
topics
Close Box

News From Us:

Our latest report; our new video section; and jobs with paidContent.org and paidContent:UK


Google’s Schmidt To Newspaper Publishers: Don’t ‘Piss Off’ Consumers

Someone called the appearance of Google Chairman and CEO Eric Schmidt as the closing keynote for the annual meeting of newspaper publishers “a twist of fate.” Poppycock. It’s as orchestrated as a routine on Dancing with the Stars. The Associated Press board and executives certainly knew when they announced a campaign to “protect” news content yesterday—with Google (NSDQ: GOOG) as lightening rod—that Schmidt would be the coda for the Newspaper Association of America conference concluding today in San Diego.

And what does Schmidt have to say about AP? Responding to a question after his speech: “We at Google have a multimillion-dollar deal with the Associated Press not only to distribute their content but also to host it on our servers.” That’s why, he added, “I was a little confused by all of the excitement in the news in the last 24 hours. I’m not sure what they were referring to. We have a very, very successful deal with AP and hope that will continue for many, many years.”

But Schmidt came down harder on concerns about intellectual property and fair use: “From our perspective, we look at this pretty thoroughly and there is always a tension around fair use … I would encourage everybody, think in terms of what your reader wants. These are ultimately consumer businesses and if you piss off enough of them, you will not have any more.”

As for the legalities, “all of these partially thought-through legal systems are being challenged by the ubiquity of the internet.”

Bull detector: Schmidt spoke in his keynote about computer-based BS detectors that might help reporters sniff out whether or not a politician is telling the truth. I’ll apply my own non-computerized version to say that, yes, on the surface Schmidt and Google lawyer Alexander Macgillivray, who blogged about this issue today, are both right that the AP content protection campaign isn’t about the licensed content Google has from the wire service. But, as AP execs and board members have said, this is about the way content from across the news industry is used, not about AP-licensed content. That would make Google part of it, no matter which side you fall on.

Update: Poynter has posted an unofficial transcript of the Q&A. The NAA audio is here.

Related Stories
Apr 7, 2009 12:25 PM ET
Share

Posted In: Media & Publishing, Newspapers, Companies, Google, eric schmidt, naa

  • who pass out of engineering and science colleges are interested about software testing as a career. When I passed out at a time when the IT had started to boom back in India, most of the fresh graduates with whom I interacted didn’t even know there existed jobs or careers like software testing.

  • AP should figure out where their bread is gonna be buttered for the foreseeable future.

  • PK

    Tired ogfGoogle's attitude….eventually THEY will go the way of "traditional media"...watch..

  • boris

    "I’m not sure what they were referring to"

    I'm sure the people at Associated Press don't know either, really. But it sure sounded scary so I guess they won.

  • Nathan R

    AP should allow for a set of members that include Google, Yahoo, Microsoft & AOL given they are the future of APs survival.  Schmidt hammered home the need to focus on the consumer preferences—how, where and when they want to consumer content.  Rather than take the buried head and legalistic approach of the traditionalist, he is taking a tear down your wall approach.

The Economics of Content | paidContent Newsletter

Know something we don’t?

Send Us a News Tip

All tips are anonymous and untraced.

Sponsors

Contributors