The Guardian
topics
Close Box

News From Us:

Our latest report; our new video section; and jobs with paidContent.org and paidContent:UK


Searching For a Business Model in La La Land: Lala Tries Again With Another Music Service

imageAt least you have to give it marks for trying…again and again. Lala, the three year-old polymorphous online music startup that started as a CD swapping service and changed its business model twice and then almost closed down, is now launching a new online music streaming service, with a twist. The new service works like this (and if I have to use bullet points to explain it, you know what that means for consumer adoption):

—The site first analyzes a user’s existing music collection on their PC, and creates an online virtual locker of all their songs, which can be played as streaming songs online for free. Sounds similar to what MP3.com tried eons ago and got sued out of business.
—Songs not in user’s collection can be streamed once free, and then for 10 cents, streamed unlimited times online.
—For downloads, prices are similar to iTunes and Amazon (NSDQ: AMZN), but that 10 cents in streaming can be credited towards an MP3 purchase.
—It has signed on all four major labels, and four major labels, and over 170,000 independent labels and distributors.

Competition is heavy, from much more high profile (and free) ventures like MySpace Music, imeem, Rhapsody and many others. Having a $20 million in investment from Warner Music Group does help though… WMG is also an investor in imeem, by the way. To make this model work, the company tells NYT that it will have to convince about 3 to 4 percent of its customers to pay for music. Lala splits the cost of both the 10-cent online streaming and the full MP3 with the labels, and makes a greater percentage on the online song, reports Billboard.

WMG’s Michael Nash, EVP of digital music strategy, hypes it up big time in the Billboard story, but with $20 million sunk in, he has to. “What I think is really interesting is the idea of virtual ownership—creating a value proposition that’s between the sampling of a stream and the purchase of a download.” Reading between the lines, sounds a bit too nuanced…oh wait, did I mention Lala Land?

Update: Another thought: And lets say if the company does prove the model (or even if they come halfway to broader adoption), what’s to stop the other bigger companies, with lots more audiences, from copying it?

Related Stories
Oct 20, 2008 11:11 PM ET
Share

Posted In: Entertainment, Music, lala.com

  • Until mobile devices are constantly connected to the internet, is anyone realistically going to pay for streams that they can get for free, albeit from ad-funded sites?

    Steve Purdham
    CEO - We7
    http://www.we7.com

  • Rafat Ali

    David
    Nope, didn't see the CNET story until now..glad someone else is not slavishly salivating over it.

  • David Quinn

    Sounds like you ripped the story from Cnet without doing any reporting.  I played with it briefly and there's more than enough there that I'll play with again at work tomorrow.  Give to them for buiding something pretty amazing without using advertising.  If only blogs like this could live on something other than display ads.  Oh well.

  • It's interesting to see new things coming out.  As you know when new technologies there are always going to be companies trying to duplicate it.  The main company should always be looking for ways to upscale their own technologies to be the first to bring it to the market…

The Economics of Content | paidContent Newsletter

Know something we don’t?

Send Us a News Tip

All tips are anonymous and untraced.

Sponsors

Contributors