The Guardian
topics

Exclusive
Is FiLife Running On Borrowed Time?

  • Comments Comments (View)
  • Text Size: A A

Less than two months after talking up the turnaround at Dow Jones-IAC (NSDQ: IACI) personal finance JV FiLife, paidContent has learned the site’s continued existence is no certainty. It survived the multiple trimmings as Barry Diller cut back on IAC’s portfolio of emerging businesses, but the company is now exploring options that range from leaving it open to a sale or a full shut down. When Ezra Kucharz, president and GM for just over a year, left for CBS (NYSE: CBS) in January, both IAC and DJ credited him publicly with turning around the site and building it to the #4 personal finance site with 4.4 million unique visitors in December. Now both companies are declining comment about the site’s future.

One possibility for IAC could be selling its stake to Dow Jones (NYSE: NWS), which recently bought out SmartMoney partner Hearst. But that’s a well-established brand with an 800,000-circ magazine. Whether DJ would even want to own FiLife outright is unclear—as is whether a deal actually would involve much money. What FiLife does have—more traffic than SmartMoney.com, where personal finance is just one category, and a digital mentality. Is there a way to combine the two?

FiLife has had a bit of a tortured life from its beginning: taking more than a year to move from an idea to a blog, then taking so long to emerge from that status the plans appeared to be dormant. Dave Kansas, brought in from the Wall Street Journal to launch the site, was replaced by online vet Kucharz in late 2008. Adam Wiener, executive editor and VP-content was promoted to GM when Kucharz left, but not given the title of president.

It’s made strides on the editorial side. Just last month FastCompany picked it as the most innovative company in the finance area for using “a Q&A format with a host of social and game-like features to get Americans talking about money. More as warranted—and please feel free to e-mail me if you have details.

Related Stories
Mar 19, 2010 11:15 PM ET

Hourglass

Share

Posted In: Features, Exclusive, Media & Publishing, Online News, Companies, IAC, News Corp., Dow Jones

  • Chaz Harris

    I bought Cisco stock at about the time of the Scientic Atlanta acquisition, believing that their foray into video would break them out of the "communications router" domain.  As a Time Warner customer, as I've moved to flat screens, DVR, and HD, so I've had 3 Scientific Atlanta boxes (upgrades) in my home in the last 2 years.
    On message boards,  I always asked why Cisco couldn't make money here, or what was their strategy in video.  I really thought video for Cisco could be like the IPOD was for Apple, which moved Apple out of the realm of pure highly competitive computers (they even dropped "computer" from their name).
    What a disappointment Cisco stock has been over the last 2 months falling nearly 25% in value.  Their failure to articulate this video strategy has been especially disappointing to me.

  • Dan blogs on his team's efforts here: http://blogs.cisco.com/news/2007/10/network_web_20.html

    He states, in part, "Cisco’s network assets are relevant to Web 2.0, particularly in the entertainment space…(and) Network + Web 2.0 assets can help address the most challenging problem of the next era: how to find anything."

The Economics of Content | paidContent Newsletter

Know something we don’t?

Send Us a News Tip

All tips are anonymous and untraced.

Sponsors

Contributors