The Guardian
topics

VideoPlaza Gets €3.5 Million To Expand European Video Ad Service

Web video ads and analytics provider VideoPlaza of Stockholm is taking a €3.5 million first proper funding round to solidify its European efforts.

The outfit can place ads of various formats in online videos powered by 15 different video platforms, and then offers metrics to help advertisers plan and understand campaigns.

VideoPlaza got nearly €500,000 in seed funding from Creandum and angels back in July 2008 and, CEO Sorosh Tavakoli tells me, broke even in December…

“That proved the business worked in a smaller size - now we’re raising money to do the same on a larger scale,” he says. The new funding from Northzone means VideoPlaza now has both of Spotify’s original institutional investors on board.

So far, VideoPlaza has 25 paying clients in seven European and Scandinavian markets, including broadcasters TV4 and Kanal5 at home in Sweden. Brightcove is a key partner, but there are problems getting to plug in with YouTube. It has staff in Stockholm, London and Paris and recently hired a southern Europe director based in London. Tavakoli says Germany is the next step before he settles to concentrate on existing markets.

So far, it customers are mainly Scandinavian, so it needs to break out, but it does place ads in Incisive Media and Factory Media videos, as well as in some licensed by Myvideorights. But don’t expect American expansion with this funding: “The U.S. is a non-focus area - we turn down business there.”

Online video has reached a point where growing adoption is presenting a fast-moving advertiser opportunity - and an accompanying rush from advertising and metrics vendors. But online video advertising is going large just at the same time content owners in some other media sectors run away from advertising as a sole funding avenue.

Here’s Beet.tv’s Andy Plesser interviewing Tavakoli at a recent roundtable Andy and I co-chaired at The Guardian…

Mar 18, 2010 4:00 AM ET

Soroush Tavokali

Share

Posted In: Advertising, Media & Publishing, TV, VOD, Money, M&A & Venture Capital, Venture Capital

  • Joe

    The best thing AOL can do is lose the AOL name - it carries too much negative baggage.  They actually have a lot of good web properties that are being dragged down by their association with AOL.  Even the AOL-branded channels have a lot of good content and would be a lot more popular if they didn't have to drag around all the old bad press.

    That, and some competent management at the top tier—people who actually understand software & web development —would go a long way.  They need to stop driving away their smart, creative employees and start retaining them.  You get what you pay for, and when you hire the cheapest labor on the planet to develop your stuff, it shows.

  • Steve Rosenbush

    Mark, thanks for your comment. I think your point is true for M&A;in general. It's certainly true with respect to leveraged deals. But I don't think this particular deal was about cash flow. AOL already has plenty of cash flow. What it needs is revenue growth, which is currently negative. And it needs to fix a strategic problem. It just can't be successful online, long term, without a better presence in social networking. I think Bebo is about boosting revenue prospects by turning AIM and ICQ into stronger ad-supported social networking platforms. Whether it gets $850 million worth of revenue growth is the key question. It paid a lot of money for Bebo.

  • The thing is Steve, in the current climate of liquidity problems, isn't the acquisition of non-profit making Bebo actually a liability? With M&A;deals now, the focus is very much on cash-flow, and a leaky subscription model doesn't engender confidence.

    I agree about the other sizeable assets like the instant messaging <a href="http://www.bestpricecomputers.co.uk/glossary/ip-convergence.htm">IPs</a>.

The Economics of Content | paidContent Newsletter

Know something we don’t?

Send Us a News Tip

All tips are anonymous and untraced.

Sponsors

Contributors