The Guardian
topics

Exclusive
Is FiLife Running On Borrowed Time?

  • Comments Comments (View)
  • Text Size: A A

Less than two months after talking up the turnaround at Dow Jones-IAC (NSDQ: IACI) personal finance JV FiLife, paidContent has learned the site’s continued existence is no certainty. It survived the multiple trimmings as Barry Diller cut back on IAC’s portfolio of emerging businesses, but the company is now exploring options that range from leaving it open to a sale or a full shut down. When Ezra Kucharz, president and GM for just over a year, left for CBS (NYSE: CBS) in January, both IAC and DJ credited him publicly with turning around the site and building it to the #4 personal finance site with 4.4 million unique visitors in December. Now both companies are declining comment about the site’s future.

One possibility for IAC could be selling its stake to Dow Jones (NYSE: NWS), which recently bought out SmartMoney partner Hearst. But that’s a well-established brand with an 800,000-circ magazine. Whether DJ would even want to own FiLife outright is unclear—as is whether a deal actually would involve much money. What FiLife does have—more traffic than SmartMoney.com, where personal finance is just one category, and a digital mentality. Is there a way to combine the two?

FiLife has had a bit of a tortured life from its beginning: taking more than a year to move from an idea to a blog, then taking so long to emerge from that status the plans appeared to be dormant. Dave Kansas, brought in from the Wall Street Journal to launch the site, was replaced by online vet Kucharz in late 2008. Adam Wiener, executive editor and VP-content was promoted to GM when Kucharz left, but not given the title of president.

It’s made strides on the editorial side. Just last month FastCompany picked it as the most innovative company in the finance area for using “a Q&A format with a host of social and game-like features to get Americans talking about money. More as warranted—and please feel free to e-mail me if you have details.

Related Stories
Mar 19, 2010 11:15 PM ET

Hourglass

Share

Posted In: Features, Exclusive, Media & Publishing, Online News, Companies, IAC, News Corp., Dow Jones

  • This service will become yet another victim of convergence. AT&T;may have all the might in the world but has failed to realize that convergence is not ingrained into our psyches. The Mobile TV is struggling not for the lack of matured technology but because of the lack of adoption (usage). However, technology over awes us and blinds us from understanding the real reasons.

    I foresee people investing on Mobile TV enabled handsets as well subscribing to this service but little using it. Now the writer of the news item has a handset and an access to the service and I would be surprised if he would watch more than 10 minutes a day, over the coming months. I would be happy to receive an advice from him, if he does.

    Mobile TV has a future if it is stopped being positioned and run as an extension of the living room TV.  A Mobile TV is limited by the screen size and resolution, which limits the value delivered - especially while running the living room TV programs. The loss of the "video" value may be compensated by enhancing the audio value by designing programs for "on the go" needs. I foresee it succeeding as an enhanced radio with a video capability. This is just one part of the story and would be happy to discuss others too and can be contacted on mikegauba@gmail.com

The Economics of Content | paidContent Newsletter

Know something we don’t?

Send Us a News Tip

All tips are anonymous and untraced.

Sponsors

Contributors