The Guardian
topics

Exclusive
Is FiLife Running On Borrowed Time?

  • Comments Comments (View)
  • Text Size: A A

Less than two months after talking up the turnaround at Dow Jones-IAC (NSDQ: IACI) personal finance JV FiLife, paidContent has learned the site’s continued existence is no certainty. It survived the multiple trimmings as Barry Diller cut back on IAC’s portfolio of emerging businesses, but the company is now exploring options that range from leaving it open to a sale or a full shut down. When Ezra Kucharz, president and GM for just over a year, left for CBS (NYSE: CBS) in January, both IAC and DJ credited him publicly with turning around the site and building it to the #4 personal finance site with 4.4 million unique visitors in December. Now both companies are declining comment about the site’s future.

One possibility for IAC could be selling its stake to Dow Jones (NYSE: NWS), which recently bought out SmartMoney partner Hearst. But that’s a well-established brand with an 800,000-circ magazine. Whether DJ would even want to own FiLife outright is unclear—as is whether a deal actually would involve much money. What FiLife does have—more traffic than SmartMoney.com, where personal finance is just one category, and a digital mentality. Is there a way to combine the two?

FiLife has had a bit of a tortured life from its beginning: taking more than a year to move from an idea to a blog, then taking so long to emerge from that status the plans appeared to be dormant. Dave Kansas, brought in from the Wall Street Journal to launch the site, was replaced by online vet Kucharz in late 2008. Adam Wiener, executive editor and VP-content was promoted to GM when Kucharz left, but not given the title of president.

It’s made strides on the editorial side. Just last month FastCompany picked it as the most innovative company in the finance area for using “a Q&A format with a host of social and game-like features to get Americans talking about money. More as warranted—and please feel free to e-mail me if you have details.

Related Stories
Mar 19, 2010 11:15 PM ET

Hourglass

Share

Posted In: Features, Exclusive, Media & Publishing, Online News, Companies, IAC, News Corp., Dow Jones

  • Recognizing that Yahoo's announcement is a business document designed for investors and the media, I must say that I cannot remember one bit of it. Too much…too boring. Yawn. For myself there is far too much disconnect between Yahoo's brand persona and its business persona. I am not saying that Yahoo's PR team should adopt Jon Stewart like irreverence, but is this the type of language that the company's investors really want to read? What happened to the fun forward looking company that seems bent on fading from my memory?

  • Is the picture or the Arbiter quote above really appropriate here?  Yahoo's suffered from a combination of lackluster management and Google brilliancies for several years now.  They still have many great products and sites, a substantial search presence, huge internet traffic, and brilliant Web 2.0 development.  At 20% of Google's market cap I think this spells "potential" for Yahoo, not the lack of it.

  • I read a nice quote recently in Robert Townsend's "Up The Organisation" that seems appropriate:

    "I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganising; and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency, and demoralisation." - Petronius Arbiter, A.D. 60

The Economics of Content | paidContent Newsletter

Know something we don’t?

Send Us a News Tip

All tips are anonymous and untraced.

Sponsors

Contributors