Skype Co-Founders Raise $165 Million For New Fund—Short Of Initial Goal

topics

Skype Co-Founders Raise $165 Million For New Fund—Short Of Initial Goal

Comments (View)
Text Size: A A
Email
Share

Skype cofounders Niklas Zennström and Janus Friis have raised $165 million for their second venture fund which will mainly back European high growth tech startups. Zennström and Friis—who also started Kazaa and Joost—had initially aimed to raise $266 million for the fund a year ago but downplay the shortfall telling the Financial Times, “when we started we had a flexible number” and “we think we have exactly the right amount of money.”

Zennström and Friis started their investment comapny—Atomico Ventures—four years ago. Over the last year, it has backed several startups, including mobile gaming firm Zattikka, music service Rdio, and social games site Playfire.

In its announcement, Atomico loosely lays out the criteria for how it will use the new cash. Zennström: “We will seek to invest in exceptional entrepreneurs who are building exceptional businesses. We will target companies that we believe have the potential to generate significant growth, transform their industries, and deliver strong returns.”

Related Stories

Joseph Tartakoff

@josephtartakoff Mar 21, 2010 11:05 PM ET

Photo: Corbis

Posted In: Money, M&A & Venture Capital, Venture Capital

latest headlines

Seo Career

Embeddable cheerful is a seemly move, but (a) i heard finished cede exemplify windowing now the delighted and (b) U.S. only? In decree to imitate web you aspiration to correspond to Global now also livelihood permalinks to the content. Windowing is deficient school, regular TV faith - cheerful on the Web is about just now availability and comprehensiveness. Any more lowdown on these areas would embody helpful.

Dave

With this type of unique exclusive content the service could become popular. Will it make money? Thats the bigger question.

patricia

and let me add, just as I had believe social networking would end up being nothing more than a feature during the social networking site boom, and that professionally created video content would trump user generated during the user generated video boom, I do believe that we will find later on that "letting the content go" to the users versus training them to come to us will be a mistake. I really do.

We'll see though!

patricia

I'm sorry. Nobody's going to agree with me but when I read this:

We don’t want to assume the users will come to the content.”

I think: Oy

Why does business feel the Web is so different than regular world? i realize all this disruption and chaos has made the view a little cloudy, but nothing's chaned. Just the channel (IP) - people are the same, they are motivated by the same things and they can be collected and lead as they always have been. The only thing right now is that the industry's tools for doing so have been a little shaken up. I don't agree that content should go to the user, but, what do I know :)

Mark my words - in the end, we are the same world we were before.

Frank Sinton

Embeddable content is a good move, but (a) i heard there will be windowing for the content and (b) U.S. only? In order to be "web" you need to be Global immediately and keep permalinks to the content. Windowing is old school, traditional TV thinking - content on the Web is about instant availability and comprehensiveness. Any additional information on these areas would be helpful.