<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://paidcontent.org/rss/topic/regulatory/</id>
	<title type="text">paidContent news watch | Regulatory</title>
	<subtitle type="text">The Economics of Digital Content</subtitle>
	<link rel="alternate" href="http://paidcontent.org/" type="text/html"/>
	<link rel="self" href="http://paidcontent.org/rss/topic/" type="application/atom+xml"/>
	<updated>2012-02-12T16:04:46Z</updated>
	<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
	<generator uri="http://expressionengine.com/" version="1.7.1">ExpressionEngine</generator>
	<logo>http://paidcontent.org/images/site/logo_pc_secondary.png</logo>
	
		<entry>
			<title>Nokia&#39;s Mexico, Hungary, Finland Phone Assembly Goes To Asia; 4,000 Jobs Go</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-nokias-mexico-hungary-finland-phone-assembly-goes-to-asia-4000-jobs-go/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-02-08:article/419-nokias-mexico-hungary-finland-phone-assembly-goes-to-asia-4000-jobs-go</id>
			<published>2012-02-08T08:24:58Z</published>
			<updated>2012-02-08T09:20:00Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Ingrid Lunden</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/34/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>Today brings news of yet another round of capital-intensive cost-cutting for the challenged mobile phone maker Nokia: the company today announced that it would be transferring smartphone assembly from factories in Hungary, Finland and Mexico, and putting the operation in Asia.
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>Today brings news of yet another round of capital-intensive cost-cutting for the challenged mobile phone maker Nokia: the company today announced that it would be transferring smartphone assembly from factories in Hungary, Finland and Mexico, and putting the operation in Asia.
</p><p>The plants will remain operational now for &#8220;smartphone product customization.&#8221; The news comes amidst unconfirmed reports that the company is planning to curtail its Symbian lineup after the release of the next model.</p>

<p>Nokia (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=NOK" class="ticker" title="NOK">NYSE: NOK</a>) says that the transfer will result in the loss of 4,000 jobs in total, and the reductions will take place through the end of 2012.</p>

<p>Nokia does not outline how much the move to Asia will mean in terms of money saved, but this is a decision that has been some time in the making: these were plants that were spared in the last round of cuts under CEO Stephen Elop. </p>

<p>Since then, Nokia has <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-nokia-q4-earnings-scrambling-for-grip-still-falling-1m-lumia-phones-sol/" title="reported yet more declines in its smartphone shipments">reported yet more declines in its smartphone shipments</a>, mainly around its legacy Symbian platform. The company is now gradually moving to making more of its smartphone portfolio based on Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Phone platform.</p>

<p>Now, Nokia says that the move is being made to put the manufacturing bases closer to where the different components are being made for those smartphones. That is a move we have seen from many other companies&#8212;and was the subject of a <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-your-iphone-has-to-be-made-in-china-and-apple-cant-absolve-your-guilt/" title="series of stories">series of stories</a> recently concerning Apple (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=AAPL" class="ticker" title="AAPL">NSDQ: AAPL</a>) in China and the role of Foxconn in that business.</p>

<p>The move to make these plants focused on customization, meanwhile, points to some focus that Nokia does seem to maintain on its software and services for its devices&#8212;a crucial part of the company&#8217;s differentiation as it moves more and more to a platform being used by its competitors as well. Others that make Windows Phone devices include Samsung and HTC.</p>

<p>The news comes amidst <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/02/03/nokia_symbian/" title="other reports">other reports</a> about Nokia that claim the company is planning to curtail its Symbian lineup after the next model comes out. </p>

<p>Symbian is gradually being phased out for Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Phone platform, but Nokia had originally said it would support the OS until 2016, and that could still be the case even if it stopped making devices based on it. Nokia <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-symbian-now-officially-no-longer-under-the-wing-of-nokia-2300-jobs-go/" title="transferred the operation of Symbian">transferred the operation of Symbian</a> to Accenture last year.</p>

<p>A spokesperson from Nokia told paidContent that the article was &#8220;speculative at best&#8221; and would not comment on device rumor or speculation: </p>

<p>&#8220;As we have previously said Symbian continues to be an important part of our portfolio and going forward it will play a more focused role as we accelerate our transition to Windows Phone,&#8221; he said. &#8220;We remain fully committed to the platform through 2016, which means on-going software support as we go forward.&#8221; </p>

<p>The company is currently rolling out an update to Symbian, Belle, and the devices remain popular in the Middle East, Russia and India, even as they have lost out to Android-based devices, Apple&#8217;s iPhone and even RIM (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=RIMM" class="ticker" title="RIMM">NSDQ: RIMM</a>) in other markets.
</p>
											<p><strong>Related</strong></p>
						<ul class="related">
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-your-iphone-has-to-be-made-in-china-and-apple-cant-absolve-your-guilt/" title="Your iPhone Has To Be Made In China, And Apple Can't Absolve Your Guilt">Your iPhone Has To Be Made In China, And Apple Can't Absolve Your Guilt</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-nokia-design-chief-hints-at-lumia-phones-with-nfc-and-wireless-charging/" title="Nokia Design Chief: We're Developing A Windows Phone With NFC Technology">Nokia Design Chief: We're Developing A Windows Phone With NFC Technology</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-nokia-q4-earnings-scrambling-for-grip-still-falling-1m-lumia-phones-sol/" title="Nokia Q4: Scrambling For A Grip, But Still Falling; 1M+ Lumia Phones Sold">Nokia Q4: Scrambling For A Grip, But Still Falling; 1M+ Lumia Phones Sold</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-apple-back-on-top-as-bestselling-smartphone-in-the-u.s/" title="Kantar: Apple Back On Top As Bestselling Smartphone In The U.S.">Kantar: Apple Back On Top As Bestselling Smartphone In The U.S.</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-symbian-now-officially-no-longer-under-the-wing-of-nokia-2300-jobs-go/" title="Symbian Now Officially No Longer Under The Wing Of Nokia, 2,300 Jobs Go">Symbian Now Officially No Longer Under The Wing Of Nokia, 2,300 Jobs Go</a></li>
</ul>

									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
									<category term="695" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="EC"/>
							
									<category term="715" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Mobile"/>
							
									<category term="716" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Money"/>
							
									<category term="833" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Companies"/>
							
									<category term="849" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Apple"/>
							
									<category term="683" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="iPhone"/>
							
									<category term="898" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Google"/>
							
									<category term="679" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Android"/>
							
									<category term="1118" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="HTC"/>
							
									<category term="928" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Microsoft"/>
							
									<category term="1119" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Windows Phone"/>
							
									<category term="959" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Nokia"/>
							
									<category term="982" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="RIM"/>
							
									<category term="983" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Samsung"/>
							
									<category term="805" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Countries"/>
							
									<category term="817" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Europe"/>
							
									<category term="828" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Russia"/>
							
									<category term="820" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Finland"/>
							
									<category term="806" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Asia"/>
							
									<category term="808" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="India"/>
							
									<category term="807" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="China"/>
							
							
							
						</entry>
	
		<entry>
			<title>Was Google&#39;s Disastrous January A Passing Storm Or Sign Of Things To Come?</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-02-04:article/419-was-googles-disastrous-january-a-passing-storm-or-sign-of-things-to-com</id>
			<published>2012-02-04T10:00:27Z</published>
			<updated>2012-02-06T03:33:29Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Tom Krazit</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/18417/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>It&#8217;s a little stunning to contemplate how wrong things have gone for Google (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=GOOG" class="ticker" title="GOOG">NSDQ: GOOG</a>) in just the first month of 2012, as the company hopes to put a disastrous January in the rear-view mirror with perhaps another tear-jerking Super Bowl ad this Sunday. Larry Page and Sergey Brin haven&#8217;t turned into Jim Balsillie and Mike Lazaridis or anything, but Google just endured the worst month in the company&#8217;s history and nothing will get easier as rivals and the government take aim at what used to be such a delightful fuzzy little tech success story.
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>It&#8217;s a little stunning to contemplate how wrong things have gone for Google (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=GOOG" class="ticker" title="GOOG">NSDQ: GOOG</a>) in just the first month of 2012, as the company hopes to put a disastrous January in the rear-view mirror with perhaps another tear-jerking Super Bowl ad this Sunday. Larry Page and Sergey Brin haven&#8217;t turned into Jim Balsillie and Mike Lazaridis or anything, but Google just endured the worst month in the company&#8217;s history and nothing will get easier as rivals and the government take aim at what used to be such a delightful fuzzy little tech success story.
</p><p>To be sure, the former CEOs of Research in Motion (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=RIMM" class="ticker" title="RIMM">NSDQ: RIMM</a>) would gladly trade places with Page, who last year regained control of the company he founded and brought new focus, and Brin, who is probably living out an alpha geek&#8217;s dream by working on Google&#8217;s most secret and far-out projects. But even since Michigan&#8212;Page&#8217;s alma mater&#8212;beat Virginia Tech in the January 3rd Sugar Bowl, not much has gone right for Google.</p>

<p>A quick recap:</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://searchengineland.com/googles-jaw-dropping-sponsored-post-campaign-for-chrome-106348" title="Tarnished Chrome">Tarnished Chrome</a></strong>: Google was caught participating in a &#8220;sponsored post&#8221; scheme involving advertising for its Chrome browser, in which bloggers were paid to write favorable reviews of the browser that in some cases included the Web page for Chrome. It blamed outside agencies and reduced the rank value for the Chrome Web page, as buying links through ad campaigns is a no-no for everyone else.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-did-google-go-too-far-mixing-social-and-search/" title="When Google+ Is A Minus">When Google+ Is A Minus</a></strong>: Google managed to out-CES CES with its breathtaking decision to incorporate Google+ pages directly and prominently into its crown jewel: search results. The Search Plus Your World rollout generated a huge controversy that overshadowed any one single event that happened that week in Las Vegas, troubling both internal employees and former Googlers unable to recognize a company that would alter its search results to favor links to a half-baked social network.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-google-investigating-kenyan-client-poaching-allegations/" title="Caught Red-Handed">Caught Red-Handed</a></strong>: After a local-business directory in Kenya noticed that some of its customers were calling it for support on building Web sites&#8212;a product the company didn&#8217;t offer&#8212;Mocality set a trap for Google employees who were systematically accessing its database and attempting to poach its customers. A &#8220;mortified&#8221; Google fired its country manager for Kenya and apologized.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-google-misses-earnings-expectations-during-q4-stock-down-9-percent/" title="A Short Quarter">A Short Quarter</a></strong>: Google missed financial analysts&#8217; expectations for its fourth quarter, and observers began to wonder if the cash machine that is Google&#8217;s AdWords and AdSense had started to wane. Google&#8217;s stock has fallen nearly 7 percent since those earnings were released amid a rise in the Nasdaq over the same period.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204624204577176964003660658.html?KEYWORDS=google+con+artist" title="Dealing Drugs">Dealing Drugs</a></strong>: Google had already admitted to improper behavior involving ads for drugs sold by rogue pharmacies, but details emerged from a Wall Street Journal (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=NWS" class="ticker" title="NWS">NSDQ: NWS</a>) report in January that showed Page was aware of the fact that Google ad executives helped those operating such pharmacies circumvent review policies designed to exclude such ads. </p>

<p><strong><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-europe-wants-google-to-freeze-its-new-privacy-policy/" title="Transparently Murky">Transparently Murky</a></strong>: In a public-relations decision borrowed from a desperate company&#8217;s playbook, Google chose to reveal sweeping changes to its privacy policy at almost the exact same time that Apple (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=AAPL" class="ticker" title="AAPL">NSDQ: AAPL</a>) released its fourth-quarter financial results on schedule. While the tech press was pretty busy dealing with the impact of Apple&#8217;s surreal quarter, Congress was not, and Google was forced to explain its conduct. The company said the changes were designed to simplify policies across multiple products, but they also had the effect of letting Google see your online activity across a host of its products&#8212;from Gmail to YouTube, Google+ to search&#8212;and form an aggregated picture of your potential buying habits.</p>

<p><strong><a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/2/3/2769480/verizon-galaxy-nexus-removed-from-googles-developer-support-pages" title="When It Rains">When It Rains</a></strong>: In a sign of just how far Google has fallen in many people&#8217;s estimation, an obscure change to a technical policy involving the Galaxy Nexus phone&#8212;the best Android device yet released&#8212;briefly convinced many that Google was removing that device from the special Nexus category, which allows people owning those phones to receive software updates unencumbered by their wireless carrier. Google exacerbated the problem by botching its initial public-relations response, and outrage flew at the speed of Twitter before it was able to clarify that nothing had changed from a consumer&#8217;s perspective.</p>

<p>Meanwhile, Google&#8217;s biggest rivals are living it up.</p>

<p>Facebook is the new darling of the tech and investment communities following its plans to file for what will probably be the biggest initial public offering ever raised by a tech company. Tim Cook is attempting to prove he can run Apple without Steve Jobs, and has taken a big step with a huge quarter and a new interest in charitable giving. Microsoft&#8217;s collaboration with Nokia (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=NOK" class="ticker" title="NOK">NYSE: NOK</a>) probably won the week at CES, it is preparing to launch a new operating system that will help bridge the chasm between the company&#8217;s PC era and what it hopes is its mobile era and it gleefully jumped all over Google&#8217;s missteps.</p>

<p>Google&#8217;s unlikely to have a month like that again, this year anyway. But it&#8217;s kind of shocking to contemplate just how uneasy the company has made a lot of people by its decisions around social search and privacy. Perhaps more troubling, its responses to those big questions have been tone-deaf and almost defiant, traits one did not associate with Google until recently.</p>

<p>January could easily be a blip in the long run for Google. The economy seems to be improving, which could boost search advertising spending. Android remains a vital part of the mobile story, and Apple could have a hard time sustaining the pent-up demand for the iPhone 4S (it would be unfair to expect gains like that every quarter). And if Google+ really does turn into a service on par with Facebook or Twitter, Google could have both pieces of the modern online data puzzle&#8212;search and social&#8212;at its disposal.</p>

<p>So why then do many people I talk to about Google&#8212;both tech insiders and regular Joes at the bar&#8212;<a href="http://pandodaily.com/2012/01/24/larry-page-to-googlers-if-you-dont-get-spyw-work-somewhere-else/" title="feel uneasy">feel uneasy</a>? Maybe it&#8217;s because a lot of those people finally realized in January that Google has turned into a conventional company&#8212;one that pushes the line wherever possible to maximize revenue and profit even at the expense of users and customers&#8212;<a href="http://investor.google.com/corporate/2004/ipo-founders-letter.html" title="something it swore it would never become">something it swore it would never become</a>.</p>

<p>Once you&#8217;ve gone down that road, it&#8217;s pretty hard to go back, and all the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_driverless_car" title="driverless cars">driverless cars</a> and <a href="http://gigaom.com/2012/02/03/what-is-the-mystery-entertainment-device-google-is-testing/" title="mysterious entertainment devices">mysterious entertainment devices</a> in the world won&#8217;t necessarily help.</p>


											<p><strong>Related</strong></p>
						<ul class="related">
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-europe-wants-google-to-freeze-its-new-privacy-policy/" title="Europe Wants Google To Freeze Its New Privacy Policy">Europe Wants Google To Freeze Its New Privacy Policy</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-2.7-billion-daily-likes-and-other-numbers-to-be-divined-from-facebooks-/" title="2.7 Billion Daily Likes And Other Key Numbers From Facebook's S-1">2.7 Billion Daily Likes And Other Key Numbers From Facebook's S-1</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-google-misses-earnings-expectations-during-q4-stock-down-9-percent/" title="Updated: Google Miss Sends Stock Down 9 Percent On Cost-Per-Click Questions">Updated: Google Miss Sends Stock Down 9 Percent On Cost-Per-Click Questions</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-google-investigating-kenyan-client-poaching-allegations/" title="Updated: 'Mortified' Google To Act On Those Who Poached Rival's Clients">Updated: 'Mortified' Google To Act On Those Who Poached Rival's Clients</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-is-it-legal-for-google-to-shut-competitors-out-of-social-search/" title="Is It Legal For Google To Shut Competitors Out Of Social Search?">Is It Legal For Google To Shut Competitors Out Of Social Search?</a></li>
</ul>

									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="659" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Advertising"/>
							
									<category term="1123" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Apps"/>
							
									<category term="678" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Gadgets"/>
							
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
									<category term="715" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Mobile"/>
							
									<category term="746" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Search"/>
							
									<category term="724" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Social Media"/>
							
									<category term="833" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Companies"/>
							
									<category term="898" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Google"/>
							
									<category term="679" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Android"/>
							
						</entry>
	
		<entry>
			<title>Europe Wants Google To Freeze Its New Privacy Policy</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-europe-wants-google-to-freeze-its-new-privacy-policy/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-02-03:article/419-europe-wants-google-to-freeze-its-new-privacy-policy</id>
			<published>2012-02-03T12:06:42Z</published>
			<updated>2012-02-03T12:34:44Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Robert Andrews</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/47/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>An influential European privacy body has urged Google (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=GOOG" class="ticker" title="GOOG">NSDQ: GOOG</a>) to &#8220;pause&#8221; its new privacy policy due to be implemented in March. The <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/index_en.htm" title="Article 29 Data Protection Working Party">Article 29 Data Protection Working Party</a> wrote a <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/other-document/files/2012/20120202_letter_google_privacy_policy_en.pdf" title="letter">letter</a> to Larry Page&#8230;
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>An influential European privacy body has urged Google (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=GOOG" class="ticker" title="GOOG">NSDQ: GOOG</a>) to &#8220;pause&#8221; its new privacy policy due to be implemented in March. The <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/index_en.htm" title="Article 29 Data Protection Working Party">Article 29 Data Protection Working Party</a> wrote a <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/documentation/other-document/files/2012/20120202_letter_google_privacy_policy_en.pdf" title="letter">letter</a> to Larry Page&#8230;
</p><blockquote><p>&#8220;Given the wide range of services you offer, and popularity of these services, changes in your privacy policy <strong>may affect many citizens in most or all of the EU</strong> member states.</p>

<p>&#8220;<strong>We wish to check the possible consequences</strong> for the protection of the personal data of these citizens in a coordinated procedure. We have therefore asked the French data protection authority, the CNIL, to take the lead. The CNIL has kindly accepted this task and will be your point of contact for the data protection authorities in the EU. </p>

<p>&#8220;In light of the above, <strong>we call for a pause in the interests</strong> of ensuring that there can be no misunderstanding about Google&#8217;s commitments to information rights of their users and EU citizens, until we have completed our analysis.&#8221;</p></blockquote>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Good that Europe&#8217;s data protection authorities are ensuring @<a href="https://twitter.com/Google">Google</a> &#8216;s new privacy policy complies with EU law <a href="http://t.co/vsHfGWsW" title="http://bit.ly/xiz8U6">bit.ly/xiz8U6</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%2523EUDataP">#EUDataP</a></p>&mdash; Viviane Reding (@VivianeRedingEU) <a href="https://twitter.com/VivianeRedingEU/status/165397938334482432" data-datetime="2012-02-03T11:35:16+00:00">February 3, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<p>The Article 29 group advises the executive European Commission on data protection and privacy matters and comprises representatives of member states&#8217; national data protection bodies.</p>

<p>In January, <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-googles-new-privacy-policy-aimed-at-integrating-youtube/" title="Google said">Google said</a> it would unify privacy policies from over 70 of its products, a move which mirrors its unification of user services with Google+ and its personalised search launch. It explained: &#8220;<strong>Regulators globally have been calling for shorter, simpler privacy policies</strong>.&#8221;</p>

<p>The Article 29 group has previously forced Google to <a href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-google-et-al-must-try-harder-on-privacy-eu-says/" title="reduce its data retention time">reduce its data retention time</a>, unsuccessfully asked Google to <a href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-google-faces-attack-over-streetview-in-germany/" title="warn the public">warn the public</a> before it starts photographing for Street View, issued tough new <a href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-eu-committee-suggests-tough-rules-on-locational-privacy-may-influence-u/" title="location sharing guidelines">location sharing guidelines</a> and adjudged a Facebook privacy policy revision &#8220;<a href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-eu-is-the-latest-to-criticize-facebooks-privacy-changes/" title="unacceptable">unacceptable</a>&#8221;</p>

<p>The European Commision&#8217;s justice department sought to raise public awareness of use of their data by designating January 28 <a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/12/50&amp;format=HTML&amp;aged=0&amp;language=EN&amp;guiLanguage=en" title="European Data Protection Day">European Data Protection Day</a>.</p>

<p>Separately, the EC&#8217;s antitrust department is currently assessing competition complaints against Google.
</p>
									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="1141" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Privacy"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
									<category term="695" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="EC"/>
							
									<category term="833" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Companies"/>
							
									<category term="898" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Google"/>
							
							
						</entry>
	
		<entry>
			<title>Apple v. Moto In Germany: One iPhone Injunction Ordered, Another One Lifted</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-apple-on-motorola-ip-claims-in-germany-this-old-pager-patent-is-invalid/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-02-03:article/419-apple-on-motorola-ip-claims-in-germany-this-old-pager-patent-is-invalid</id>
			<published>2012-02-03T10:16:54Z</published>
			<updated>2012-02-04T00:25:55Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Ingrid Lunden</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/34/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>Apple (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=AAPL" class="ticker" title="AAPL">NSDQ: AAPL</a>) in the last 24 hours has been dealt not one but two blows in court cases involving Motorola (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=MMI" class="ticker" title="MMI">NYSE: MMI</a>) and patents in Germany, one involving IP licensing on older iPhone models (not the 4S) and one involving iCloud. However, as the day progressed, an injunction on the sale of the older iPhone models was lifted as the cases continue to develop.
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>Apple (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=AAPL" class="ticker" title="AAPL">NSDQ: AAPL</a>) in the last 24 hours has been dealt not one but two blows in court cases involving Motorola (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=MMI" class="ticker" title="MMI">NYSE: MMI</a>) and patents in Germany, one involving IP licensing on older iPhone models (not the 4S) and one involving iCloud. However, as the day progressed, an injunction on the sale of the older iPhone models was lifted as the cases continue to develop.
</p><p>Today&#8217;s ruling in a Mannheim court granted Motorola a permanent injunction on Apple products that use its iCloud technology, specifically around push email services, and, like many patent cases, is not based on a recent patent but an older one&#8212;in this case, one that Motorola holds around paging devices (one of the company&#8217;s earliest wireless products).</p>

<p><strong>Update</strong>: Motorola has issued a formal response to the decision: </p>

<blockquote><p>&#8220;We are pleased that the Mannheim court has recognized the importance of our intellectual property and granted an enforceable injunction in Germany against Apple Sales International,&#8221; it said in an emailed statement.</p></blockquote>

<p>[original article continues below]</p>

<p>Apple, meanwhile, said that it is already appealing in this case:</p>

<blockquote><p>&#8220;Apple believes this old pager patent is invalid and we&#8217;re appealing the court&#8217;s decision,&#8221; Apple told paidContent in an emailed statement.</p></blockquote>

<p>But before you start thinking that this might mean that various new, iCloud-enabled Apple products will be disappearing from German retailers, think again. PaidContent understands that the injunction applies only to a specific function: the instant, push email service that Apple offers via MobileMe/iCloud, and there are only a limited number of users in Germany actually taking that service. Plus, there are already at least two workarounds available: for customers to either download the email manually; or to set up a script to check email regularly anyway. </p>

<p>The case is still developing so it remains to be seen how the injunction will play out.</p>

<p><strong>More pressing, it seems, is the outcome of another Motorola court case that dates back from December, and which has been in the works for <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-the-android-pile-up-on-apple-in-europe-motorola-gets-injunction-in-germ/" title="even longer">even longer</a>, which has resulted in Apple pulling some older models of the iPad and iPhone from its online store in Germany</strong>. </p>

<p><strike>These products were pulled overnight and are <a href="http://www.apple.com/de/iphone/" title="indeed absent">indeed absent</a> when paidContent visited the online store this morning. They are, however, still being sold offline through Apple stores and other retailers.</strike></p>

<p><strong>Update</strong>: The temporary injunction has now been lifted, but Motorola says the case continues:</p>

<blockquote><p>&#8220;We are pleased that the Mannheim court has recognized the importance of our intellectual property and granted an enforceable injunction in Germany against Apple Sales International. Although the enforcement of the injunction has been temporarily suspended, Motorola Mobility will continue to pursue its claims against Apple.&#8221;</p></blockquote>

<p>Earlier, Apple said it would appeal the decision:</p>

<blockquote><p>&#8220;While some iPad and iPhone models are not available through Apple&#8217;s online store in Germany right now, customers should have no problem finding them at one of our retail stores or an authorised reseller. Apple is appealing this ruling because Motorola repeatedly refuses to license this patent to Apple on reasonable terms, despite having declared it an industry standard patent seven years ago.&#8221;</p></blockquote>

<p>This case, essentially, is another chapter in Apple&#8217;s European battle over FRAND patents, which fall under rules that require equipment makers to license IP on &#8220;Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory&#8221; terms, in order to make sure that IP that has been declared industry standard is not intentionally made more expensive for competitors than non-competitors in a field like smartphones.</p>

<p>Apple has been facing other issues over FRAND terms in Europe, specifically with Samsung. That case looks like it may have taken a turn in Apple&#8217;s favor: this week the <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-applesamsung-legal-skirmishes-have-a-new-player-the-european-commission/" title="European Commission said">European Commission said</a> that it would start an antitrust investigation into Samsung and whether it has violated FRAND rules in its dealings with Apple. The EC cautions that it has not yet declared a judgement in this investigation so it could still go either way.</p>

<p>In this Motorola FRAND case, Motorola Mobility says that it approached Apple in 2007 with its FRAND licensing terms and attempted to negotiate a license with Apple for over three years. </p>

<p>&#8220;Apple&#8217;s refusal to negotiate in good faith, as well as their aggressive litigation campaign against Android, left Motorola Mobility with no option other than to seek to enforce the Company’s rights and patent portfolio. Motorola Mobility remains committed to licensing rather than litigation as the proper vehicle for resolving intellectual property disputes,&#8221; Motorola told paidContent in an emailed statement.</p>

<p>You might recall that disputes over FRAND licensing was the <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-samsung-faces-aussie-tablet-injunction-apple-accuses-it-of-patent-ambus/" title="issue">issue</a> in the FRAND dispute with Samsung&#8212;the case that spurred the EC investigation</p>

<p>Whether this will result in a FRAND investigation of Motorola by the EC remains to be seen, but if it does that could have wider implications since the Commission is already investigating antitrust issues regarding the proposed merger between Motorola and Google.</p>

<p><strike>Given that this is all really about stabbing at your competition on a legal level, one possible outcome might be particularly ironic: if what people want are Apple products, by not being able to buy the less expensive, older models, they may end up opting for the 4S in the end and boost sales of the company&#8217;s highest margin, priciest device. A Win-Win in that case?</strike>
</p>
											<p><strong>Related</strong></p>
						<ul class="related">
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-applesamsung-legal-skirmishes-have-a-new-player-the-european-commission/" title="Apple/Samsung Legal Skirmishes Have A New Player: The European Commission">Apple/Samsung Legal Skirmishes Have A New Player: The European Commission</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-living-in-a-smartphone-world-apple-number-three-among-all-mobile-player/" title="Living In A Smartphone World: Apple Number-Three Among ALL Mobile Players">Living In A Smartphone World: Apple Number-Three Among ALL Mobile Players</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-samsung-wins-march-trial-in-bid-to-ban-iphone-4s-in-australia/" title="Samsung Wins The Right To March Trial In Bid To Ban iPhone 4S In Australia">Samsung Wins The Right To March Trial In Bid To Ban iPhone 4S In Australia</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-the-android-pile-up-on-apple-in-europe-motorola-gets-injunction-in-germ/" title="The Android Pile-Up On Apple In Europe: Motorola Gets Injunction In Germany">The Android Pile-Up On Apple In Europe: Motorola Gets Injunction In Germany</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-samsung-faces-aussie-tablet-injunction-apple-accuses-it-of-patent-ambus/" title="Samsung: Second Tablet Injunction? Asks 2.4 Percent Chip Royalty From Apple">Samsung: Second Tablet Injunction? Asks 2.4 Percent Chip Royalty From Apple</a></li>
</ul>

									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="691" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Patents"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
									<category term="695" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="EC"/>
							
									<category term="715" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Mobile"/>
							
									<category term="833" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Companies"/>
							
									<category term="849" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Apple"/>
							
									<category term="1117" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="iPad"/>
							
									<category term="683" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="iPhone"/>
							
									<category term="898" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Google"/>
							
									<category term="937" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Motorola"/>
							
									<category term="975" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Qualcomm"/>
							
									<category term="983" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Samsung"/>
							
									<category term="805" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Countries"/>
							
									<category term="817" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Europe"/>
							
									<category term="822" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Germany"/>
							
							
							
						</entry>
	
		<entry>
			<title>Videoplaza Raises $12 Million For Its Multiscreen Video Ad Platform</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-videoplaza-raises-12-million-for-its-multiscreen-video-ad-platform/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-02-01:article/419-videoplaza-raises-12-million-for-its-multiscreen-video-ad-platform</id>
			<published>2012-02-01T08:00:19Z</published>
			<updated>2012-02-01T20:01:20Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Ingrid Lunden</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/34/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>The rising popularity of streaming video services is causing a knock-on effect for companies serving ads around that content. And here&#8217;s another example of that in action: today UK-based video ad platform <a href="http://www.videoplaza.com/" title="Videoplaza">Videoplaza</a> is announcing a new $12 million round of funding. 
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>The rising popularity of streaming video services is causing a knock-on effect for companies serving ads around that content. And here&#8217;s another example of that in action: today UK-based video ad platform <a href="http://www.videoplaza.com/" title="Videoplaza">Videoplaza</a> is announcing a new $12 million round of funding. 
</p><p>Leading the second round of investment were Qualcomm (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=QCOM" class="ticker" title="QCOM">NSDQ: QCOM</a>) Ventures and Innovacom, along with participation from prior investors Creandum and Northzone; and takes the total amount of funding in the company to almost $18 million.</p>

<p>Videoplaza says that it will be using the investment to help fund its international growth and product development. Those two areas appear to be running fast at the moment anyway: the company says that its client base already spreads across 17 markets, and in the past year its ad serving volumes grew five-fold. Some of its clients include the publisher Dennis, French commercial broadcaster M6 and Spanish newspaper group La Vanguardia and the France-Telecom-owned interactive ad network Unanimis, and it partners with other established names in the business, like Brightcove, to help monetize their video ad traffic.</p>

<p>Videoplaza&#8217;s target is to tap into some of the $160 billion that is estimated to be spent on TV advertising annually at the moment, and following those ad budgets as media buyers try to chase down viewers as they start watch more and more of that TV content on an ever-growing variety of screens, from IP-enabled TVs to smartphones, tablets, cars and desktop computers&#8212;and who knows what else. Videoplaza projects that by 2020 there will be more than 10 billion connected devices in consumers&#8217; hands that could be used for consuming streamed video. </p>

<p>It is not the only one: companies like YuMe, spotXchange, BrightRoll (a Videoplaza partner), Hulu, CBS (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=CBS" class="ticker" title="CBS">NYSE: CBS</a>) and many, many others are also scrambling for substantial market share in this space. It&#8217;s still a fast-growing area, with the amount of ad-funded, streamed video content still very much on the rise&#8212;both in terms of volumes and consumption&#8212;but there is bound to be some consolidation on the cards among these ad players, too.</p>

<p>A stake from a company like Qualcomm&#8212;which plays a central role in making processors and other parts and software for mobile devices&#8212;could potentially give Videoplaza a leg up in that respect. At the moment the vast majority of video ad consumption for Videoplaza is still coming from PCs: only eight percent came from other devices. But the company believes that by 2013 (that is, in a year) that will shift to a 50-50 balance.
</p>
									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="659" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Advertising"/>
							
									<category term="678" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Gadgets"/>
							
									<category term="1163" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Tablets"/>
							
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
									<category term="695" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="EC"/>
							
									<category term="700" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Media &amp; Publishing"/>
							
									<category term="709" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="TV"/>
							
									<category term="713" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Broadcast"/>
							
									<category term="715" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Mobile"/>
							
									<category term="724" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Social Media"/>
							
									<category term="730" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Video"/>
							
									<category term="833" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Companies"/>
							
									<category term="863" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="CBS"/>
							
									<category term="889" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Five"/>
							
									<category term="1118" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="HTC"/>
							
									<category term="1125" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Hulu"/>
							
									<category term="975" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Qualcomm"/>
							
									<category term="805" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Countries"/>
							
									<category term="817" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Europe"/>
							
									<category term="821" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="France"/>
							
							
							
						</entry>
	
		<entry>
			<title>Apple/Samsung Legal Skirmishes Have A New Player: The European Commission</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-applesamsung-legal-skirmishes-have-a-new-player-the-european-commission/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-01-31:article/419-applesamsung-legal-skirmishes-have-a-new-player-the-european-commission</id>
			<published>2012-01-31T13:00:54Z</published>
			<updated>2012-01-31T13:32:55Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Ingrid Lunden</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/34/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>The ongoing, back-and-forth legal fight that is the Apple/Samsung patent dispute today took on a new dimension in one of its key battlegrounds, when the European Commission launched an antitrust inquiry into Samsung&#8217;s technology licensing practices.
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>The ongoing, back-and-forth legal fight that is the Apple/Samsung patent dispute today took on a new dimension in one of its key battlegrounds, when the European Commission launched an antitrust inquiry into Samsung&#8217;s technology licensing practices.
</p><p>This looks like the next step along in an investigation that was first launched by the European Commission last year, when its interest was piqued by cases concerning <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-samsung-faces-aussie-tablet-injunction-apple-accuses-it-of-patent-ambus/" title="Samsung's technology patents">Samsung&#8217;s technology patents</a>. </p>

<p>At least some of these patents fall under FRAND (Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory) licensing rules that regulate how much Samsung can charge Apple (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=AAPL" class="ticker" title="AAPL">NSDQ: AAPL</a>) to license them for use in products like its iPhone and iPad. Apple contends it has paid up; Samsung believes it has not. </p>

<p><strong>The Commission&#8217;s chief antitrust interest is in whether Samsung, being a dominant player in the handset market, is overcharging its handset competitors (like Apple) to use these patents as a way of handicapping them in the market.</strong></p>

<p>The Commission <a href="http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/12/89&amp;format=HTML&amp;aged=0&amp;language=EN&amp;guiLanguage=en" title="writes">writes</a> in a news release that launching formal proceedings &#8220;means that the Commission will examine the case as a matter of priority,&#8221; but not that it has already taken a judgement on the matter.</p>

<p>We have reached out to Samsung for a formal response to this announcement and will update this post as we learn more. In the meantime, the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204740904577194503316197864.html" title="WSJ">WSJ</a> notes that a Commission spokesperson said that the proceedings were undertaken independently, and not at the response of any complaint from a private company.</p>

<p>Meanwhile, this was not the only piece of negative legal news that Samsung had in Europe today. </p>

<p>In Germany, a court <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/31/samsung-apple-idUSL5E8CV1I620120131" title="upheld the injunction that was put on to Samsung's 10.1-inch version of its Android-based Galaxy Tab">upheld the injunction that was put on to Samsung&#8217;s 10.1-inch version of its Android-based Galaxy Tab</a>, one of the devices that Apple believes copies its own iPad tablet. Samsung has actually created a new version of the 10.1 Tab, the 10.1N, to sell to the German market that gets around the issues that Apple raises in its complaint. This has gotten the all-clear to sell in other markets like Australia. The German case to sell the 10.1N is due to be heard later this month.</p>

<p>Samsung and Apple, big competitors in the marketplace over their respective smartphones and tablets, are fighting each other in courtrooms around the world over patents, including in the U.S., Korea and Japan, Australia, the UK and several courts in Europe.
</p>
											<p><strong>Related</strong></p>
						<ul class="related">
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-samsung-wins-march-trial-in-bid-to-ban-iphone-4s-in-australia/" title="Samsung Wins The Right To March Trial In Bid To Ban iPhone 4S In Australia">Samsung Wins The Right To March Trial In Bid To Ban iPhone 4S In Australia</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-in-androidapple-fight-samsung-says-it-wont-seek-an-iphone-4s-ban-in-kor/" title="In Android/Apple Fight, Samsung Says It Won't Seek Korean iPhone 4S Ban">In Android/Apple Fight, Samsung Says It Won't Seek Korean iPhone 4S Ban</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-samsung-faces-aussie-tablet-injunction-apple-accuses-it-of-patent-ambus/" title="Samsung: Second Tablet Injunction? Asks 2.4 Percent Chip Royalty From Apple">Samsung: Second Tablet Injunction? Asks 2.4 Percent Chip Royalty From Apple</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-the-android-pile-up-on-apple-in-europe-motorola-gets-injunction-in-germ/" title="The Android Pile-Up On Apple In Europe: Motorola Gets Injunction In Germany">The Android Pile-Up On Apple In Europe: Motorola Gets Injunction In Germany</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-motorola-adds-iphone-4s-icloud-to-list-of-products-it-says-hit-patents/" title="Motorola Adds iPhone 4S, iCloud, To List Of Products It Says Hit Patents">Motorola Adds iPhone 4S, iCloud, To List Of Products It Says Hit Patents</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-samsung-is-doing-well-now-raising-1bn-looking-to-tizen-to-do-better/" title="Samsung Is Doing Well; Now Raising $1B, Looking To Tizen To Do Better?">Samsung Is Doing Well; Now Raising $1B, Looking To Tizen To Do Better?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-motorola-wins-a-round-in-mobile-patent-war-against-apple/" title="Motorola Wins A Round In Mobile Patent War Against Apple">Motorola Wins A Round In Mobile Patent War Against Apple</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-highlights-of-2011-a-year-of-tech-and-publishing-lawsuits-by-the-number/" title="Highlights Of 2011: A Year Of Tech And Publishing Lawsuits, By The Numbers">Highlights Of 2011: A Year Of Tech And Publishing Lawsuits, By The Numbers</a></li>
</ul>

									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="678" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Gadgets"/>
							
									<category term="1163" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Tablets"/>
							
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="691" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Patents"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
									<category term="695" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="EC"/>
							
									<category term="833" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Companies"/>
							
									<category term="849" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Apple"/>
							
									<category term="1117" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="iPad"/>
							
									<category term="683" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="iPhone"/>
							
									<category term="898" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Google"/>
							
									<category term="679" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Android"/>
							
									<category term="983" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Samsung"/>
							
									<category term="805" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Countries"/>
							
									<category term="806" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Asia"/>
							
									<category term="809" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Japan"/>
							
									<category term="810" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Korea"/>
							
									<category term="817" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Europe"/>
							
									<category term="822" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Germany"/>
							
							
							
						</entry>
	
		<entry>
			<title>AT&amp;T: The iPhone Was Good, But Not Good Enough To Hold Off A Q4 Loss</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-att-the-iphone-was-good-but-not-good-enough-to-hold-off-a-q4-loss/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-01-26:article/419-att-the-iphone-was-good-but-not-good-enough-to-hold-off-a-q4-loss</id>
			<published>2012-01-26T15:30:14Z</published>
			<updated>2012-01-26T15:38:15Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Ingrid Lunden</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/34/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>A set of quarterly results today from AT&amp;T (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=T" class="ticker" title="T">NYSE: T</a>) that underscored some of the aftershocks the carrier is feeling in the wake of its failed bid to buy T-Mobile USA. The carrier swung to a loss and failed to meet analysts&#8217; estimates on earnings, partly down to a $4 billion charge it took for ending negotiations with Deutsche Telekom (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=DT" class="ticker" title="DT">NYSE: DT</a>), after meeting what appeared to be insurmountable regulatory opposition to the deal.
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>A set of quarterly results today from AT&amp;T (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=T" class="ticker" title="T">NYSE: T</a>) that underscored some of the aftershocks the carrier is feeling in the wake of its failed bid to buy T-Mobile USA. The carrier swung to a loss and failed to meet analysts&#8217; estimates on earnings, partly down to a $4 billion charge it took for ending negotiations with Deutsche Telekom (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=DT" class="ticker" title="DT">NYSE: DT</a>), after meeting what appeared to be insurmountable regulatory opposition to the deal.
</p><p>The $4 billion charge&#8212;$3 billion in fees and $1 billion in wireless spectrum to T-Mobile USA&#8212;put a big dampener the quarter, which otherwise saw big gains in what the carrier refers to as its &#8220;growth engines&#8221;: wireless services and specifically those around smartphones; wireline data, including its U-verse TV service; and business services.</p>

<p>Overall revenues were $32.5 billion for the quarter, coming in above analyst estimates according to a poll from <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ae?s=T+Analyst+Estimates" title="Yahoo">Yahoo</a>. Excluding the charges, earnings per share were $0.42, which missed average analysts&#8217; estimates of $0.43. The total net loss for the quarter was $6.63 billion.</p>

<p><strong>iPhone juggernaut</strong>. It&#8217;s been a year since AT&amp;T lost its exclusive grip on the iPhone in the U.S. but such is the power of the Apple (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=AAPL" class="ticker" title="AAPL">NSDQ: AAPL</a>) brand in wireless right now, and AT&amp;T&#8217;s continuing hold on its original iPhone customers, that the carrier nevertheless continues to get great dividends out of its association with it. AT&amp;T said that it made 7.6 million iPhone activations for the quarter, with overall smartphone sales totaling 9.4 million devices. </p>

<p>AT&amp;T didn&#8217;t spell out exactly how many iPhones it sold of those activated&#8212;and indeed some could have been bought directly from Apple unlocked. But if you assume that most would have been bought directly via AT&amp;T, that works out to AT&amp;T accounting for some 20 percent of the 37 million iPhones Apple sold in the last quarter, and iPhone accounting for some 80 percent of AT&amp;T&#8217;s smartphone sales.</p>

<p>It also shows that despite some of the negative press that AT&amp;T has faced over the quality of its wireless data network, it is still holding on to its customers over competitors Verizon and Sprint (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=S" class="ticker" title="S">NYSE: S</a>). In its earnings earlier this week, Verizon noted that it had sold 7.7 million smartphones and seen 4.3 million iPhone activations in the quarter.</p>

<p>Correspondingly, AT&amp;T said it saw a 10 percent growth in wireless revenues to $16.7 billion. Wireless data revenue growth is outstripping that of mobile revenues overall: it was $5.9 billion, up nearly 20 percent on a year ago, which AT&amp;T says was driven by internet access, app usage and messaging. </p>

<p>AT&amp;T&#8217;s fixed digital content play isn&#8217;t doing so bad, either. Revenues for its U-verse high-speed broadband and TV service were up by almost 44 percent over a year ago, and partly offset declines in DSL. Still not by enough: total revenues for wireline services were down by 1.4 percent to $14.9 billion.</p>

<p>AT&amp;T does not break out tablets as an individual category and instead groups them with other non-phone &#8220;branded computing devices&#8221; like aircards. It said it had its best-ever quarter for the category, with sales of 571,000 with total subscribers now numbering 5.1 million, a rise of 70 percent.</p>


											<p><strong>Related</strong></p>
						<ul class="related">
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-verizon-moved-4.2-million-iphones-in-q4-but-costs-higher-than-expected/" title="Verizon Moved 4.2 Million iPhones In Q4 But Costs Higher Than Expected">Verizon Moved 4.2 Million iPhones In Q4 But Costs Higher Than Expected</a></li>
</ul>

									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="678" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Gadgets"/>
							
									<category term="1163" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Tablets"/>
							
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
									<category term="700" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Media &amp; Publishing"/>
							
									<category term="709" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="TV"/>
							
									<category term="715" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Mobile"/>
							
									<category term="716" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Money"/>
							
									<category term="718" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Earnings"/>
							
									<category term="734" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Technologies / Formats"/>
							
									<category term="738" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Broadband"/>
							
									<category term="833" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Companies"/>
							
									<category term="849" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Apple"/>
							
									<category term="683" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="iPhone"/>
							
									<category term="850" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="AT&amp;T"/>
							
									<category term="1000" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Sprint"/>
							
									<category term="1004" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="T&#45;Mobile"/>
							
									<category term="1024" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Verizon"/>
							
							
						</entry>
	
		<entry>
			<title>Update 2: Privacy Alert: O2 Fixes Hole That Shared Users&#39; Phone Numbers</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-privacy-alert-o2-accused-of-sharing-mobile-surfers-phone-numbers/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-01-25:article/419-privacy-alert-o2-accused-of-sharing-mobile-surfers-phone-numbers</id>
			<published>2012-01-25T15:36:53Z</published>
			<updated>2012-01-26T10:11:54Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Ingrid Lunden</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/34/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p><strong>Update</strong>: Mobile operator O2 says that as of 2pm Wednesday, it has fixed the part of its mobile web browsing service that was reporting mobile phone users&#8217; telephone numbers to websites they visited via O2&#8217;s mobile data network. 
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p><strong>Update</strong>: Mobile operator O2 says that as of 2pm Wednesday, it has fixed the part of its mobile web browsing service that was reporting mobile phone users&#8217; telephone numbers to websites they visited via O2&#8217;s mobile data network. 
</p><p>In a <a href="http://blog.o2.co.uk/home/2012/01/o2-mobile-numbers-and-web-browsing.html" title="blog post">blog post</a>, it said that the phone numbers were revealed between January 10 and January 25, as a result of &#8220;technical changes&#8221; around &#8220;routine maintenance&#8221;. It was unintended. </p>

<p>The company further writes: &#8220;In addition to the usual trusted partners, there has been the potential for disclosure of customers’ mobile phone numbers to further website owners.&#8221; Who are the &#8216;usual trusted partners&#8217;? O2 writes that normally it shares numbers &#8220;only where absolutely required by trusted partners who work with us on age verification, premium content billing, such as for downloads, and O2&#8217;s own services,&#8221; but does not give more details of who exactly goes on that whitelist. It should be noted that this is also in contradiction to O2&#8217;s initial response, which implied that showing the number was a normal part of mobile web browsing, not an accident.</p>

<p>More disclosure about the whitelist, and how O2 shares a user&#8217;s phone number, may be forthcoming: O2 says it is now in conversation with the Information Commissioners&#8217; Office and Ofcom about the matter&#8212;not to mention the many angry customers criticizing O2 on Wednesday and threatening to take their mobile business elsewhere.</p>

<p><em>Original post with more details on this story follows below.</em></p>

<p>O2, one of the largest mobile operators in Europe, says that it is currently investigating accusations that it is sharing its customers&#8217; mobile numbers with websites visited while surfing on the carrier&#8217;s mobile data network. </p>

<p>The allegations come amid growing questions of user privacy both at the regulatory level and among consumers. These have been highlighted over a spread of cases in the last several months covering companies like Facebook, Google (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=GOOG" class="ticker" title="GOOG">NSDQ: GOOG</a>) and Microsoft (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=MSFT" class="ticker" title="MSFT">NSDQ: MSFT</a>)&#8212;as well as device makers and carriers working with companies like CarrierIQ.</p>

<p>And they come on the same day that the European Commission <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/25/us-eu-dataprivacy-idUSTRE80O0X220120125?feedType=RSS&amp;feedName=internetNews" title="published">published</a> new rules regarding data privacy, with companies that breach them facing fines of up to two percent of their annual turnover. These laws would only come into effect at the end of 2013.</p>

<p>Lewis Peckover, a web systems administrator in London, <a href="ways to verify a user is on a mobile device/network. Didn't expect it to be quite so easy on @O2" title="said">said</a> he first noticed the issue on Tuesday, when he was looking for &#8220;ways to verify a user is on a mobile device/network&#8221; and discovered that his own mobile number was getting displayed as part of the header information.</p>

<p>To explore the matter further, he set up a <a href="http://lew.io/headers.php" title="simple website">simple website</a>&#8212;which he named &#8220;Bad O2!&#8221;&#8212;that lets users see what information gets passed to that website when they visit it from a particular browser or device. He encouraged users to try this out for themselves.</p>

<p>The result has been that several other people have also found their number appearing on the site&#8212;meaning that there is a likelihood that others going to other websites via O2&#8217;s wireless data network were also having their numbers revealed elsewhere.</p>

<p>From what we have seen so far, it looks like it is only O2 and not other carriers sharing this information: a test with Three and another via T-Mobile did not yield our numbers showing up on the diagnostic page. O2 also runs MNVO services, such as its own GiffGaff, and Tesco Mobile, and their customers are also having their numbers revealed.</p>

<p>Nor does it seem like O2 numbers appear every time: some have pointed out that their O2 numbers are not coming up in their own <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/c_davies/status/162118014421041152" title="header tests">header tests</a>. </p>

<p>However, when it does pick up the number, it appears to be happening on both iPhones as well as Android devices. Here&#8217;s one example that we were sent:</p>

<p><img src="http://paidcontent.org/images/editorial/_original/o2-number-sharing-o.jpg" />
</p><p>Chris Welton, who sent us the image, noted that he turned off his WiFi before testing, so this does not seem to be connected to the <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-o2-building-free-wifi-network-across-the-uk.-whats-the-catch/" title="free WiFi network">free WiFi network</a> that O2 rolled out last year, as part of its push into mobile advertising. </p>

<p>O2 last night told Peckover, via <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/O2/status/161872584634408960" title="Twitter">Twitter</a>, &#8220;The mobile number in the HTML is linked to how the site determines that you&#8217;re browsing from a mobile device.&#8221; </p>

<p>But it&#8217;s not clear, still, why it would be that the numbers are appearing inconsistently, and why O2 is sharing this information when our tests with other mobile operators have not come up with the same results: that implies there are ways around this that O2 is not taking. We have reached out to O2 for a response to these allegations, and, if they prove accurate&#8212;why it is that this information is getting passed along, and for what purpose.</p>

<p>Alexander Hanff, a privacy advocate and consultant for Privacy International, tells paidContent that sharing information like a telephone number to indicate mobile browsing could be a &#8220;very serious breach&#8221; of privacy regulations: </p>

<p>&#8220;It indicates a fundamental lack of understanding of privacy and security within O2 as there are many other ways to illustrate that there is a mobile device accessing a web site (such as the User Agent string),&#8221; he told us via email. &#8220;This is a serious breach with potentially serious consequences with regards to the harvesting of these numbers and phishing (for example if you open an email on your device with images embedded, the second you open that email, your phone number will be sent to the server where those images are being sent from).&#8221;</p>

<p>He also points out that there could be a &#8220;real cost to consumers&#8221;: &#8220;I am currently overseas, if my cell number is harvested and I receive cold calls whilst overseas I have to pay roaming charges for those calls - furthermore, O2 would profit from those calls (if I were an O2 customer) and the numbers could be significant.&#8221;</p>

<p>Perhaps most damagingly he notes: &#8220;This is a clear breach of the Data Protection Act as phone numbers are classed as PII for legitimate reasons, it is also likely that this is a breach of Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations and possibly a criminal breach of Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) which since early 2011 has carried penalties for &#8220;unintentional&#8221; interception of communications.&#8221;</p>

<p>Given that O2 in the UK alone has several million customers this could become a very serious issue indeed. If you are an O2 customer outside the UK, please let us know if you are also finding similar results with your own test. You can use the link <a href="http://lew.io/headers.php" title="here">here</a> to try it out.</p>

<p>The UK&#8217;s Information Commissioner&#8217;s Office (ICO) has told paidContent that a mobile number on its own is not a data breach per se, but when it is coupled with any other identifying information it can constitute a data breach. Also, she pointed out that because O2 is apparently revealing its own customers&#8217; numbers, that raises questions. The ICO also emailed a prepared statement on the situation:</p>

<blockquote><p>“Keeping people’s personal information secure is a fundamental principle that sits at the heart of the Data Protection Act and the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations. When people visit a website via their mobile phone they would not expect their number to be made available to that website. We will now speak to O2 to remind them of their data breach notification obligations, and to better understand what has happened, before we decide how to proceed.”&nbsp; </p></blockquote>

<p>Meanwhile <a href="http://thenextweb.com/mobile/2012/01/25/how-o2-could-unwittingly-help-spammers-conduct-a-nasty-phishing-campaign/" title="TNW">TNW</a> takes a look at how this one bit of information&#8212;your number&#8212;can subsequently then get used for more serious activities, such as phishing and other spam practices.
</p>
											<p><strong>Related</strong></p>
						<ul class="related">
<li><a href="http://moconews.net/article/419-o2-building-free-wifi-network-across-the-uk.-whats-the-catch/" title="O2 Building Free WiFi Network Across The UK. What's The Catch?">O2 Building Free WiFi Network Across The UK. What's The Catch?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-googles-new-privacy-policy-aimed-at-integrating-youtube/" title="Google's New Privacy Policy Aims At Integrating YouTube">Google's New Privacy Policy Aims At Integrating YouTube</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-day-after-piracy-bill-collapses-feds-shut-down-megaupload1/" title="Updated: Day After Piracy Bill Collapses, Feds Shut Down Megaupload">Updated: Day After Piracy Bill Collapses, Feds Shut Down Megaupload</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-did-google-go-too-far-mixing-social-and-search/" title="Did Google Go Too Far Mixing Social And Search?">Did Google Go Too Far Mixing Social And Search?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-whats-coming-in-2012-digital-advertising-up-close-and-personal/" title="What's Coming In 2012: Digital Advertising, Up Close And Personal">What's Coming In 2012: Digital Advertising, Up Close And Personal</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-facebook-timeline-and-ads-real-estate-for-the-highest-bidder/" title="Updated: Facebook Timeline And Ads: Real Estate For The Highest Bidder?">Updated: Facebook Timeline And Ads: Real Estate For The Highest Bidder?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-highlights-of-2011-a-year-of-tech-and-publishing-lawsuits-by-the-number/" title="Highlights Of 2011: A Year Of Tech And Publishing Lawsuits, By The Numbers">Highlights Of 2011: A Year Of Tech And Publishing Lawsuits, By The Numbers</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-for-users-outside-the-u.s.-facebook-is-getting-a-little-more-private/" title="For Users Outside The U.S., Facebook Is Getting A Little More Private">For Users Outside The U.S., Facebook Is Getting A Little More Private</a></li>
</ul>

									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="659" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Advertising"/>
							
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="1141" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Privacy"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
									<category term="695" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="EC"/>
							
									<category term="715" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Mobile"/>
							
									<category term="833" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Companies"/>
							
									<category term="849" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Apple"/>
							
									<category term="683" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="iPhone"/>
							
									<category term="888" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Facebook"/>
							
									<category term="898" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Google"/>
							
									<category term="679" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Android"/>
							
									<category term="928" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Microsoft"/>
							
									<category term="962" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="O2"/>
							
									<category term="1004" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="T&#45;Mobile"/>
							
									<category term="1094" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Twitter"/>
							
									<category term="805" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Countries"/>
							
									<category term="817" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Europe"/>
							
									<category term="832" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="UK"/>
							
							
							
						</entry>
	
		<entry>
			<title>Europe Says It Won&#39;t Adopt &#39;Bad&#39; Digital Policy Like SOPA</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-europe-says-it-wont-adopt-bad-digital-policy-like-sopa/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-01-20:article/419-europe-says-it-wont-adopt-bad-digital-policy-like-sopa</id>
			<published>2012-01-20T14:06:15Z</published>
			<updated>2012-01-20T14:11:16Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Robert Andrews</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/47/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>Don&#8217;t expect the European Commission to introduce its own version of America&#8217;s Stop Online Piracy Act (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Online_Piracy_Act" title="SOPA">SOPA</a>).
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>Don&#8217;t expect the European Commission to introduce its own version of America&#8217;s Stop Online Piracy Act (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Online_Piracy_Act" title="SOPA">SOPA</a>).
</p><p>Digital agenda commissioner Neelie Kroes, who, in a previous life as antitrust commissioner, fined Microsoft (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=MSFT" class="ticker" title="MSFT">NSDQ: MSFT</a>) billions of euros, used her Twitter stream to deride what she calls &#8220;bad&#8221; legislation&#8221;...</p>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-in-reply-to="160022462879371266"><p>@<a href="https://twitter.com/mengsel">mengsel</a> @<a href="https://twitter.com/ap">ap</a> there is no <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%2523EU">#EU</a> version of <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%2523SOPA">#SOPA</a>. Internet reg must be effective, proportionate, preserve benefits of open net</p>&mdash; Neelie Kroes (@NeelieKroesEU) <a href="https://twitter.com/NeelieKroesEU/status/160026726490058753" data-datetime="2012-01-19T15:51:59+00:00">January 19, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Glad tide is turning on <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%2523SOPA">#SOPA</a>: don&#8217;t need bad legislation when should be safeguarding benefits of open net.</p>&mdash; Neelie Kroes (@NeelieKroesEU) <a href="https://twitter.com/NeelieKroesEU/status/160302659042164736" data-datetime="2012-01-20T10:08:26+00:00">January 20, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Speeding is illegal too: but you don&#8217;t put speed bumps on the motorway <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%2523SOPA">#SOPA</a></p>&mdash; Neelie Kroes (@NeelieKroesEU) <a href="https://twitter.com/NeelieKroesEU/status/160302717011636224" data-datetime="2012-01-20T10:08:40+00:00">January 20, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Yes, @<a href="https://twitter.com/NeelieKroesEU">NeelieKroesEU</a> means what she says when she tweets. <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%2523SOPA">#SOPA</a> and all the rest</p>&mdash; Ryan Heath (@ECspokesRyan) <a href="https://twitter.com/ECspokesRyan/status/160348958902849536" data-datetime="2012-01-20T13:12:25+00:00">January 20, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<p>Europe is not just sitting back and letting piracy happen. It has its own measures in the same policy area&#8230;</p>

<p>As well as measures contained in an e-commerce directive, one of its key pieces of legislation, the Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive (IPRED), passed in 2004, controversially gave copyright holders greater powers to obtain alleged freeloaders’ details through the courts. IPRED&#8217;s implementation in Sweden was <a href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-effect-of-swedens-new-piracy-laws-twice-the-number-of-legal-downloads/" title="said">said</a> by some to have helped <a href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-file-sharing-law-cuts-swedens-web-traffic-by-30-percent/" title="boost">boost</a> legal music downloading.</p>

<p>One of Kroes&#8217; current key policy planks is creating a &#8220;single market for digital content&#8221; across Europe&#8217;s 27 separate states. Her view is that payment processing and content licensing are too complex, too territorial and include too many supply fees. She wants to drive down fees and drive up legal digital consumption on a pan-continental basis.</p>

<p>SOPA proposals include stopping payment vendors and ad networks from doing business with sites that facilitate copyright infringement, forcing search engines not to link to transgressors and compelling ISPs to block access to offending sites.
</p>
									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="1140" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Copyright"/>
							
									<category term="1104" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Piracy"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
									<category term="695" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="EC"/>
							
							
						</entry>
	
		<entry>
			<title>YouTube Fails To Convince Ad Regulator The Web Safeguards Kids Like TV Does</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-youtube-fails-to-convince-ad-regulator-the-web-safeguards-kids-like-tv-/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-01-18:article/419-youtube-fails-to-convince-ad-regulator-the-web-safeguards-kids-like-tv-</id>
			<published>2012-01-18T05:39:20Z</published>
			<updated>2012-01-18T06:23:21Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Robert Andrews</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/47/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>Two contrary advertising watchdog rulings against the same movie company highlight how video advertising to children is handled differently on TV and the web.
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>Two contrary advertising watchdog rulings against the same movie company highlight how video advertising to children is handled differently on TV and the web.
</p><p>Separate complaints were filed to the UK&#8217;s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) against movie studio Lionsgate (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=LGF" class="ticker" title="LGF">NYSE: LGF</a>) for advertising around two of its latest releases.</p>

<div class="fancy_box"><p>In the <a href="http://www.asa.org.uk/ASA-action/Adjudications/2012/1/Lions-Gate-UK-Ltd/SHP_ADJ_169661.aspx" title="first">first</a>, four complainants said images of mutilation, blood and decapitation shown in a TV trail for Conan The Barbarian was offensive and inappropriate for viewing because of extreme violence.</p>

<p>But the ASA accepted ad placement firm Clearcast&#8217;s defence that the <strong>ad was shown only after 11pm</strong>, on UK channel Dave, and so &#8220;it was unlikely to promote violence or cause widespread offence to viewers at that time&#8221;. So the complaint was not upheld.</p></div>

<div class="fancy_box"><p>In the <a href="http://www.asa.org.uk/ASA-action/Adjudications/2012/1/Lions-Gate-UK-Ltd/SHP_ADJ_173024.aspx" title="second case">second case</a>, a YouTube (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=GOOG" class="ticker" title="GOOG">NSDQ: GOOG</a>) in-video ad for Lionsgate&#8217;s 12A-rated movie Abduction - featuring shooting, car chases, punching, kissing an action - attracted a complaint from a parent whose two-year-old had seen watched it. The parent complained it was irresponsible to address the ad to children.</p>

<p>Lionsgate told the ASA it <strong>expected all YouTube viewers to be aged 13 or over</strong>, as stated by YouTube&#8217;s terms of service.</p>

<p>YouTube defended by drawing the ASA&#8217;s attention to its family-friendly advice and by offering its usual argument that it is &#8220;merely a platform and not responsible for the content of videos or ads that might appear&#8221;.</p>

<p>But the ASA upheld the complaint against Lionsgate by agreeing that some scenes were inappropriate for children and that <strong>YouTube account registration, at which time users supply their age, is not required to use the site</strong>.</p>

<p><strong>&#8220;It was not possible to prevent under-13-year-olds from viewing material,&#8221;</strong> the ASA judged.</p></div>

<p>The cases centre on an interesting challenge to regulators, and a nightmare for parents in the internet age - how do they control what their children can see when the internet, unlike UK television, has no watershed?</p>

<p>In the first case, the post-11pm scheduling for the Conan ad was enough to get Lionsgate off a negative ASA ruling. But services like YouTube do not operate temporal age windows.</p>

<p>Regardless, ASA case research went on to skewer YouTube with its self-contradiction of its own terms of service&#8230;</p>

<blockquote><p>&#8220;Information YouTube provided indicated to potential advertisers that, based on US figures from 2010, they understood <strong>seven per cent of unique visitors to be aged two to eleven</strong>, and a further nine per cent to be aged 12 to 17, with those audiences described as having 39% and 61% &#8220;Reach of Online Universe&#8221; respectively,&#8221; the ASA says.</p>

<p>&#8220;We acknowledged that data was relevant to a different market but considered it nevertheless indicated that <strong>children were likely to view footage</strong>, and therefore ads, on YouTube.</p>

<p>&#8220;We noted YouTube offered advertisers the option of &#8216;age-gating&#8217; their marketing material, whereby the ad was targeted via the date of birth registration held for users; (but) only users who were logged in and met the relevant age criteria would see such an ad.&#8221;</p>

<p>&#8220;The … clip during which the ad appeared was likely to appeal to children and … was served in such a way that it could be viewed by all YouTube users, even if they had not logged in. Because it included scenes that were unsuitable for younger children and it could be viewed by all YouTube users, we considered the ad was inappropriately targeted.&#8221;</p></blockquote>

<p>The ASA therefore found that the ad breached two rules in its advertising code and must not be run again (the movie promoted by the ad was from September 2011). It has also reminded Lionsgate to target its ads appropriately. YouTube was not complained about.</p>

<p>But the ASA stopped short of opening a wider discussion - the ongoing quest for an online equivalent to the TV watershed.
</p>
									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="659" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Advertising"/>
							
									<category term="667" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Entertainment"/>
							
									<category term="671" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Movies"/>
							
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
									<category term="833" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Companies"/>
							
									<category term="898" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Google"/>
							
									<category term="899" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="YouTube"/>
							
							
						</entry>
	
		<entry>
			<title>Yee&#45;ha! Domain Name Cash Grab Officially Under Way</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-yee-ha-domain-name-cash-grab-officially-under-way/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-01-13:article/419-yee-ha-domain-name-cash-grab-officially-under-way</id>
			<published>2012-01-13T00:27:29Z</published>
			<updated>2012-01-13T06:18:30Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Jeff Roberts</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/21598/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>It&#8217;s a wonder they pulled this off. An obscure agency and a number of its former officials are about to get rich by selling new internet names that few want or need.
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>It&#8217;s a wonder they pulled this off. An obscure agency and a number of its former officials are about to get rich by selling new internet names that few want or need.
</p><p>That&#8217;s because today is the day that ICANN, the agency that administers Internet naming conventions, begins selling new &#8216;generic domain names&#8217; for $185,000 a pop. That means new so-called generic TLD&#8217;s like &#8220;.donut&#8221; or &#8220;.sillyidea&#8221; (for example) are for now for sale.</p>

<p>Is this a good idea?</p>

<p>The folks at ICANN did a good job this week at seeding the press with &#8220;ain&#8217;t that swell&#8221; stories about a &#8220;land grab&#8221; in domain names that will create a wealth of new commerce. But meanwhile a coalition of major companies have been <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-new-internet-names-feared-loathed-by-all/" title="screaming to stop">screaming to stop</a> the process, and the FTC has been warning it will lead to a new wave of cyber-scams.</p>

<p>As we&#8217;ve reported in the past, companies are already fed up with fighting off cyber-squatters from the dozen or so existing top level domains, many of which are little-used (.biz, .jobs., .asia anyone?). The most recent example was the &#8220;.xxx&#8221; domain that brought titters to headline writers but was little more than a tax to the companies who had to buy it to ensure no one else did first. Lawyers I&#8217;ve spoken with regularly use the word &#8220;extortion&#8221; to describe the process.</p>

<p>The new gambit is the worst yet. Not only do companies have to shell out $185,000 to buy the name in the first place but they have to hand over large maintenance payments over a ten year period. They also have to become responsible for running a registry which is beyond the IT capacity of large companies.</p>

<p>Conveniently, technical and consultancy businesses are springing up to help&#8212;many of them run by former ICANN members.</p>

<p>Lest anyone doubt this is all about the cash, see the budget breakdown in a previous paidContent article. <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-how-internet-naming-authority-icaan-plans-to-double-its-revenues/" title="The article ">The article </a><br />
describes a report by ICANN itself that states the agency hopes to double its revenues. And, in an indication that ICANN has an idea just how unpopular this will be, it plans to set aside about half of its windfall for a legal war chest.</p>

<p>This process is as if the FCC, on its own initiative, decided to sell new radio spectrum that might interfere with existing stations, and then turned around and suggested that broadcasters buy the new spectrum as part of a &#8220;land grab&#8221;&#8212;while also recommending former FCC employees as consultants. The ICANN episode is especially ironic because it happened on the watch of a Republican Congress who ordinarily goes ballistic if any agency exceeds its mandate by so much as an extra paper clip. </p>

<p>ICANN has attempted to rebuff its critics but its arguments so far are not convincing. It has pointed out that there has been support domains like &#8220;.music&#8221; and &#8220;.london&#8221;&nbsp; Well, fine. Sell those two domains and, if there is obvious support for other specific domains, sell those too. ICANN also says the system will allow companies in other companies to buy non-Latin domain names. Again, well fine. Create a handful of TLD&#8217;s in other languages. </p>

<p>The press is finally starting to catch on what is happening. A Wired editor offered a <a href="http://www.kernelmag.com/comment/opinion/703/its-time-to-place-the-web-in-safer-hands/" title="blistering account of ICANN">blistering account of ICANN</a> this morning while the influential All Things D fingered <a href="http://allthingsd.com/20120111/grab-your-cash-and-warm-up-the-wagon-icann-domain-rush-kicks-off-tomorrow/?refcat=news" title="the dollars">the dollars</a> at the heart of the scheme.</p>

<p>But it&#8217;s probably too late by now. The retired ICANN directors are likely clinking glasses this very moment, congratulating themselves for pulling this off. Yee-ha, boys, enjoy your cash grab.</p>



<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
											<p><strong>Related</strong></p>
						<ul class="related">
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-new-internet-names-feared-loathed-by-all/" title="New Internet Names Feared, Loathed By All">New Internet Names Feared, Loathed By All</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-did-someone-steal-ariannas-sex-domain/" title="Did HuffPo Just Get 'Sex-Squatted'?">Did HuffPo Just Get 'Sex-Squatted'?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-how-internet-naming-authority-icaan-plans-to-double-its-revenues/" title="How Internet Naming Authority ICAAN Plans To Double Its Revenues">How Internet Naming Authority ICAAN Plans To Double Its Revenues</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-will-governments-get-to-veto-new-web-domains-like-.gay/" title="Will Governments Get To Veto New Web Domains Like .Gay?">Will Governments Get To Veto New Web Domains Like .Gay?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-icann-plan-to-upend-domain-name-system-runs-into-opposition/" title="A Plan To Upend The Domain-Name System Runs Into Opposition">A Plan To Upend The Domain-Name System Runs Into Opposition</a></li>
</ul>

									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
						</entry>
	
		<entry>
			<title>Let&#39;s Try This Again: UK Regulator Revises 4G Auction Terms For Q4 2012</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-lets-try-this-again-uk-regulator-revises-4g-auction-terms-for-q4-2012/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-01-12:article/419-lets-try-this-again-uk-regulator-revises-4g-auction-terms-for-q4-2012</id>
			<published>2012-01-12T12:13:55Z</published>
			<updated>2012-01-12T13:32:56Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Ingrid Lunden</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/34/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>While some operators in some countries (like the U.S. and Japan) have already celebrated birthdays for their LTE services, 4G in the UK hasn&#8217;t even been born yet. But now at least it looks like we might have a due date. UK regulator Ofcom today set out new proposals for a 4G spectrum auction to take place sometime in Q4 2012, which could mean the first 4G services coming to market in mid-2013. 
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>While some operators in some countries (like the U.S. and Japan) have already celebrated birthdays for their LTE services, 4G in the UK hasn&#8217;t even been born yet. But now at least it looks like we might have a due date. UK regulator Ofcom today set out new proposals for a 4G spectrum auction to take place sometime in Q4 2012, which could mean the first 4G services coming to market in mid-2013. 
</p><p>This 4G auction&#8212;covering unused spectrum in the 800MHz band, along with higher-frequency airwaves in the 2.6GHz band&#8212;had previously been scheduled for the first quarter of 2012, and for those keeping track was talked about as early as 2009. Ofcom <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-uk-launches-lte-trial-but-is-it-falling-behind-in-the-4g-race/" title="had to delay that">had to delay that</a> when major operators protested Ofcom&#8217;s proposals for how it would allocate spectrum (the combined JV of Orange and T-Mobile and their existing spectrum presented one issue; another was how Three, the smallest of them, would get a fair shake). The regulator&#8217;s priorities are to make sure that there are four strong competitors, but it also wants to ensure that it raises the highest amount of money possible from those operators in exchange for the licenses. </p>

<p>The 3G auction in UK in 2000 raised a ridiculous amount of money for the UK government: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/727831.stm" title="£22.47 billion ($35.4 billion)">£22.47 billion ($35.4 billion)</a>, with Orange, Vodafone (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=VOD" class="ticker" title="VOD">NYSE: VOD</a>) Airtel (now just called Vodafone), O2 (then owned by BT (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=BT" class="ticker" title="BT">NYSE: BT</a>) and called Cellnet), One2One (now known as T-Mobile) and new entrant Hutchison Whampoa (now called Three) all winning spectrum. Operators in the UK and elsewhere in Europe ended up having to write down some of the value of those costly 3G projects.</p>

<p>The advantage of a delay is that it has given Ofcom a chance to revisit some of the requirements that it will put on would-be 4G operators. It should be noted that so far it is staying out of saying what kind of services should run on those 4G networks, although it looks like LTE is the most-preferred technology among those operators. </p>

<p>And the disadvantage of the delay? Despite the UK government&#8217;s constant claims of being a digital leader, the UK is not very trailblazing in this case. Ofcom notes that mobile data demand in Europe is expected to grow by more than 500 percent in the next five years. For those in the UK who like to use mobile services, hopefully this delay to 4G auctions and commercial rollouts will be the last.</p>

<p>Some of the highlights from the consultation released by Ofcom today (full documentation can be found <a href="http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/award-800mhz-2.6ghz/" title="here">here</a>):</p>

<p>&#8212;<strong>98 percent cover</strong>: Ofcom proposes that 4G services will cover &#8220;at least&#8221; 98 percent of the UK population. That&#8217;s higher than 3G today, and represents an increase on the 95 percent requirement originally laid out in Ofcom&#8217;s first consultation. The UK government is investing £150 in building out coverage to &#8220;not-spots&#8221;, and one option Ofcom lists is to potentially link up one of the bidders with this government scheme to support that rollout. It will effectively mean that more remote parts of the UK will be using mobile broadband in place of fixed broadband to be connected. </p>

<p>&#8212;<strong>Competition</strong>: This time around, Orange and T-Mobile are bidding as one in their Everything Everywhere venture, bringing the existing mobile network operators down to four, not counting the possibility of another company emerging and bidding for spectrum. Ofcom said today that it believed &#8220;at least four&#8221; was the right number of operators in 4G to ensure effective competition.</p>

<p>What&#8217;s interesting is that Ofcom proposes keeping aside some of the 2.6GHz spectrum for a group of new entrants to use for new services (such as those on educational campuses). It&#8217;s not clear whether that group would count as one of Ofcom&#8217;s &#8220;at least four&#8221; operators and what other allowances they might get.</p>

<p>&#8212;<strong>New deadline</strong>: Interested parties now have 10 weeks to comment on these proposals with a final decision coming in 2012 and the auction starting a few months later.</p>


											<p><strong>Related</strong></p>
						<ul class="related">
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-uk-launches-lte-trial-but-is-it-falling-behind-in-the-4g-race/" title="UK Launches LTE Trial, But Is It Falling Behind In The 4G Race?">UK Launches LTE Trial, But Is It Falling Behind In The 4G Race?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-piracy-much-higher-than-freeloaders-confess-to-ofcom-told/" title="Piracy Much Higher Than Freeloaders Confess To, Ofcom Told">Piracy Much Higher Than Freeloaders Confess To, Ofcom Told</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-mobile-data-use-expected-to-grow-21x-by-2015/" title="Mobile Data Use Expected To Grow 21x By 2015">Mobile Data Use Expected To Grow 21x By 2015</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-mobile-news-consumption-is-highest-in-uk/" title="Mobile News Consumption Is Highest In UK">Mobile News Consumption Is Highest In UK</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-linear-tv-consumption-is-growing-but-ad-spend-is-not/" title="Linear TV Consumption Is Growing, But Is Ad Spend?">Linear TV Consumption Is Growing, But Is Ad Spend?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-smartphone-penetration-approaching-tipping-point-as-pc-usage-declines-/" title="Smartphone Penetration Approaching Tipping Point As PC Usage Declines">Smartphone Penetration Approaching Tipping Point As PC Usage Declines</a></li>
</ul>

									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
									<category term="695" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="EC"/>
							
									<category term="697" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Ofcom"/>
							
									<category term="715" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Mobile"/>
							
									<category term="734" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Technologies / Formats"/>
							
									<category term="735" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="3G"/>
							
									<category term="736" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="4G"/>
							
									<category term="738" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Broadband"/>
							
									<category term="833" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Companies"/>
							
									<category term="861" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="BT"/>
							
									<category term="890" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="France Telecom"/>
							
									<category term="891" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Orange"/>
							
									<category term="910" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Hutchison Whampoa"/>
							
									<category term="962" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="O2"/>
							
									<category term="1004" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="T&#45;Mobile"/>
							
									<category term="1030" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Vodafone"/>
							
									<category term="805" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Countries"/>
							
									<category term="817" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Europe"/>
							
									<category term="832" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="UK"/>
							
							
							
						</entry>
	
		<entry>
			<title>Hollywood Lambasts Sky Movies Ruling, But Open Access Gains Favour</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-hollywood-lambasts-sky-movies-ruling-but-open-access-gains-favour/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-01-12:article/419-hollywood-lambasts-sky-movies-ruling-but-open-access-gains-favour</id>
			<published>2012-01-12T11:11:56Z</published>
			<updated>2012-01-12T13:14:57Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Robert Andrews</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/47/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>Six Hollywood studios have urged the UK&#8217;s competition watchdog to throw out its assertion their Sky Movies deals are anti-competitive. But some of them are warming to its suggestion BSkyB (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=BSY" class="ticker" title="BSY">NYSE: BSY</a>) should offer rival services like Netflix (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=NFLX" class="ticker" title="NFLX">NSDQ: NFLX</a>) over its own set top boxes.
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>Six Hollywood studios have urged the UK&#8217;s competition watchdog to throw out its assertion their Sky Movies deals are anti-competitive. But some of them are warming to its suggestion BSkyB (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=BSY" class="ticker" title="BSY">NYSE: BSY</a>) should offer rival services like Netflix (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=NFLX" class="ticker" title="NFLX">NSDQ: NFLX</a>) over its own set top boxes.
</p><p>The Competition Commission, which has been investigating the UK market for movies on pay-TV, in August <a href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-bskyb-told-to-weaken-stranglehold-on-hollywood-movies/" title="provisionally ruled">provisionally ruled</a> as anti-competitive Sky Movies&#8217; exclusive deals to show the studios&#8217; films in the first pay-TV window (for movies on a subscription basis, including VOD).</p>

<p>The commission <a href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-bskyb-could-be-forced-to-host-on-demand-movie-rivals/" title="proposed a number of remedies">proposed a number of remedies</a>, including <strong>forcing BSkyB to open its satellite set top box platform</strong> to host competing services.</p>

<p>In <a href="http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/inquiries/ref2010/movies_on_pay_tv/responses_to_provisional_findings_and_notice_of_possible_remedies.htm" title="responses published by the commission today">responses published by the commission today</a>, Disney (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=DIS" class="ticker" title="DIS">NYSE: DIS</a>), 20th Century Fox (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=NWS" class="ticker" title="NWS">NSDQ: NWS</a>), Paramount (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=VIA" class="ticker" title="VIA">NYSE: VIA</a>), Sony (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=SNE" class="ticker" title="SNE">NYSE: SNE</a>) Pictures Television, NBC (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=CMCSA" class="ticker" title="CMCSA">NSDQ: CMCSA</a>) Universal and Warner unleash scathing criticism of the commission for failing to properly assess levels of competition in the market, as they see it. Notably, they say the commission <strong>has not accounted for the arrival of competing over-the-top services</strong>, as has been seen by this week&#8217;s Netflix launch.</p>

<p>However, two studios - Paramount and NBC Universal - favour the open-access remedy above others. This &#8220;has the best chance of being <strong>effective in resolving the competition problem</strong>&#8221;, <a href="http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/inquiries/ref2010/movies_on_pay_tv/pdf/paramount_pictures_response_to_notice_of_further_possible_remedies_non_confidential.pdf" title="according to Paramount">according to Paramount</a>. <a href="http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/inquiries/ref2010/movies_on_pay_tv/pdf/nbcuniversal_response_to_notice_of_further_possible_remedies.pdf" title="According to NBC Universal">According to NBC Universal</a>: &#8220;While this remedy might provide some short-term advantage to OTT providers, it would seem likely to become obsolete through technical and market developments such as those identified by the Commission (internet-enabled TVs and STBs).&#8221;</p>

<p>The studios are trying to protect their ability to retain exclusive deals with Sky Movies. Those deals would not be affected by Sky opening its box. That also means the proposal may not succeed in granting better studio deals to Sky&#8217;s rivals.</p>

<p>But, though it has started to offer its own on-demand programming to its set top box, BSkyB, at least for now, would rather walk over hot coals than open the box, which is the UK&#8217;s dominant pay-TV platform with over 10 million subscribers, as an over-the-top internet TV system.</p>

<p>In its submission, Sky argues &#8220;the effect is likely to be marginal&#8221; and &#8220;it is plain that (this) is not justified on the basis of the evidence and analysis put forward by the competition commission&#8221; because &#8220;Sky‟s Ethernet-enabled set top boxes do not meet the conditions required to be considered to comprise an  essential facility to which access should be mandated&#8221;.</p>

<p>Sky recently began exploiting its movies rights as VOD through its Anytime+ service on TVs. Previously, it offered on-demand movies via Sky Player (now Sky Go) and via the Sky Anytime portfion of its set top box DVR.</p>

<p>Netflix CEO <a href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-interview-netflixs-hastings-aims-to-challenge-bskyb/" title="Reed Hastings this week told paidContent">Reed Hastings this week told paidContent</a> he could bid against Sky Movies for top-tier rights and he doesn&#8217;t need to depend on the Competition Commission to do it.</p>

<blockquote><h3>Studios&#8217; Responses: Highlights:</h3>

<p><strong>Disney</strong></p>

<p>&#8220;A number of conclusions that are simply incorrect.&#8221; &#8220;Impracticable&#8221;, &#8220;disproportionate&#8221;, &#8220;misguided&#8221;.</p>

<p>&#8220;The provisional findings are predicated on the CC’s view that technological  developments will have little or no impact on competition in the pay-TV sector.&#8221;</p>

<p><strong>20th Century Fox:</strong></p>

<p>&#8220;The CC&#8217;s proposed remedies  risk  ossifying patterns of distribution in the UK at a time when the speed of technological change will produce market-driven <br />
developments.&#8221;</p>

<p>&#8220;The CC has failed to recognise the significance of one of the most important new forms of content distribution that is likely to affect the UK market: internet distribution.&#8221;</p>

<p>&#8220;It is striking that when one of the major international players in this area, Netflix, was asked about its intention in the UK it replied that &#8220;it had no comment to make&#8221; and the CC did not pursue this further.&#8221;</p>

<p><strong>Paramount:</strong></p>

<p>&#8220;None of the proposed remedies will be effective.&#8221;</p>

<p>&#8220;The CC must now recognise that the provisional findings as they stand do not provide a robust basis for analysing possible remedies.&#8221;</p>

<p><strong>Sony Pictures Television:</strong></p>

<p>&#8220;The CC should abandon its provisional view&#8230; The CC has not demonstrated ... and  has failed to take into account quantifiable and foreseeable market developments that <br />
will stimulate competition.&#8221;</p>

<p>&#8220;The clear implication of investment (from rivals like Lovefilm, Netflix) is that they believe they can compete successfully (without the need for regulatory intervention).</p></blockquote>
											<p><strong>Related</strong></p>
						<ul class="related">
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-online-movie-choice-pale-against-dvds-in-uk/" title="Online Movie Choice In UK Pales Against DVDs" muse_scanned="true">Online Movie Choice In UK Pales Against DVDs</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-bskyb-could-be-forced-to-host-on-demand-movie-rivals/" title="BSkyB Could Be Forced To Host On-Demand Movie Rivals" muse_scanned="true">BSkyB Could Be Forced To Host On-Demand Movie Rivals</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-bskyb-perplexed-by-on-demand-movie-judgement/" title="BSkyB 'Perplexed' By On-Demand Movie Judgement" muse_scanned="true">BSkyB 'Perplexed' By On-Demand Movie Judgement</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-interview-netflixs-hastings-aims-to-challenge-bskyb/" title="Interview Part 1: Netflix's Hastings Aims To Challenge BSkyB" muse_scanned="true">Interview Part 1: Netflix's Hastings Aims To Challenge BSkyB</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-netflix-undercuts-amazons-lovefilm-with-5.99-uk-pricepoint/" title="Netflix Has Launched In UK, Price War With Amazon's Lovefilm" muse_scanned="true">Netflix Has Launched In UK, Price War With Amazon's Lovefilm</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-tesco-blinkbox-marry-dvd-movies-with-online-access/" title="Tesco, Blinkbox Marry DVD, Online Movies Ahead Of Ultraviolet" muse_scanned="true">Tesco, Blinkbox Marry DVD, Online Movies Ahead Of Ultraviolet</a></li>
</ul>

									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="667" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Entertainment"/>
							
									<category term="671" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Movies"/>
							
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
									<category term="833" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Companies"/>
							
									<category term="875" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Disney"/>
							
									<category term="879" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="ABC"/>
							
									<category term="943" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="NBC Universal"/>
							
									<category term="949" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="News Corp."/>
							
									<category term="950" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="BSkyB"/>
							
									<category term="953" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Fox"/>
							
									<category term="995" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Sony"/>
							
							
						</entry>
	
		<entry>
			<title>Is It Legal For Google To Shut Competitors Out Of Social Search?</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-is-it-legal-for-google-to-shut-competitors-out-of-social-search/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-01-11:article/419-is-it-legal-for-google-to-shut-competitors-out-of-social-search</id>
			<published>2012-01-11T23:37:59Z</published>
			<updated>2012-01-12T19:29:01Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Jeff Roberts</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/21598/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>Twitter and some pundits are crying foul over Google&#8217;s decision to exclude certain competitors from its new search and social networking hybrid. But what law says the company has to help its competitors in the first place?
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>Twitter and some pundits are crying foul over Google&#8217;s decision to exclude certain competitors from its new search and social networking hybrid. But what law says the company has to help its competitors in the first place?
</p><p>Google&#8217;s decision to exclude Facebook and Twitter from some search results is a big deal because it&#8217;s a direct acknowledgement that the famous algorithms are not always objective. And it shows that, when it comes to grabbing a slice of social network ad dollars, the company is willing to risk regulatory blow-back. </p>

<p>This still doesn&#8217;t mean Google (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=GOOG" class="ticker" title="GOOG">NSDQ: GOOG</a>) did anything wrong.</p>

<p><strong>Background Context</strong></p>

<p>Google yesterday announced a new feature called &#8216;<a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-google-shakes-up-search-results-with-new-your-world-feature/" title="Search plus Your World">Search plus Your World</a>&#8217; that offers signed-in users a customized set of search results that contain personal photos and friends&#8217; activities. But soon after a honcho at Twitter, aware that its results were excluded, tweeted &#8220;bad day for the Internet&#8221; and warned of &#8220;search being warped.&#8221; Google <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-did-google-go-too-far-mixing-social-and-search/" title="responded">responded</a> by suggesting that Twitter was to blame for the omissions by breaking off a long-running data deal between the companies.</p>

<p>Influential search engine journalist Danny Sullivan has since interviewed Google chairman Eric Schmidt, and this morning penned a <a href="http://marketingland.com/schmidt-google-not-favored-happy-to-talk-twitter-facebook-integration-3151" title="persuasive piece">persuasive piece</a> that shows Google is not being entirely truthful about the affair. The bottom line is that, even if Twitter and Facebook are shutting off parts of their data stream, Google still has access to mountains of data from the public internet&#8212;data it chose to exclude from its personalized search results.</p>

<p>What this means is that a customized Google search will scrub out results that a user would ordinarily see under a regular search. </p>

<p>This is a big deal because Google has long maintained that it doesn&#8217;t tamper with its search results. Although Google has not technically broken its rule (its normal results are still objective,) it&#8217;s a slippery slope.</p>

<p>After admitting that it put a thumb on the scale in this case, Google will have to turn around and say it didn&#8217;t do so on other occasions. &#8216;Search plus Your World&#8217; has already set off <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2012/01/google-likely-to-face-ftc-complaint-over-search-plus-your-world.html" title="rumors">rumors</a> about a new FTC investigation. And the controversy will no doubt give fresh ammunition to those like Rick Santorum, the Republican presidential candidate whose top Google result is a <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-rick-santorums-search-engine-problem-hits-the-big-time/" title="filthy sex term">filthy sex term</a>.<br />
<strong><br />
Do Rigged Results Violate the Law?</strong></p>

<p>Blogger <a href="http://parislemon.com/post/15627530949/antitrust" title="MG Siegler">MG Siegler</a> was quick to point out yesterday that Google&#8217;s gambit will amplify anti-trust accusations against it. </p>

<p>Recall that, in recent years, small companies have accused Google of unfairly booting them to the equivalent of search Siberia. They claim Google lowered them in the search rankings in order to clear the way for its own push into new fields like online shopping and travel. The conspiracy-minded companies (most of which have ties to Microsoft) have so far <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CB0QFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpaidcontent.org%2Farticle%2F419-the-story-behind-shopcity-and-its-antitrust-complaint-against-google%2F&amp;ei=JRwOT5n3KYHo0QGGibTuBQ&amp;usg=AFQjCNFTCSxwrODmNFvRehtnNIJfSW1iZw&amp;sig2=EAGzP_YQ_K3nRC2ZlvXW3Q" title="struck out in court">struck out in court</a>, however, and produced no convincing evidence that Google plotted against them.</p>

<p>The case is different this time, though, because Google is clearly discriminating against Facebook and Twitter. It will have to argue that its actions are legal all the same under antitrust or free speech laws.</p>

<p>I asked a Google spokesman, Adam Kovacevich, if Google has a First Amendment right in its search results. He referred me to recent remarks by Schmidt before the US Senate:</p>

<blockquote><p>...Google’s formulation of search results is a type of “scientific opinion”—a prediction of what the user might be looking for. Those results have been deemed by several courts to be a protected form of free speech under the First Amendment.18 Just as a government panel could not dictate to the New York Times, the Drudge Report, or the Huffington Post what stories they could publish on their websites without infringing their freedom of speech, so too would government-mandated results likely violate Google’s freedom of speech.</p></blockquote>

<p>Google&#8217;s free speech theory is based on a lower court ruling in 2003 that found the company&#8217;s results were indeed just an opinion, but that reasoning has yet to tested further. It&#8217;s also unclear if the First Amendment would be a shield if Google did in fact engage in anti-competitive behavior.</p>

<p>But in any case, Kovacevich made clear that Google believes it isn&#8217;t breaking anti-trust law in the first place. He repeated the company&#8217;s oft-made argument that competition is just a click away. </p>

<p>Anti-trust investigations turn on two questions: whether a company has a dominant market share and, if so, whether it is abusing that dominant position. With a near 70 percent market share in search, Google will have a hard time arguing it&#8217;s not dominant. This means it can attempt to define the market in question not as search but as social networks where Facebook is dominant and Google clearly is not. Or else it can argue that excluding big competitors from its product is not abusive behavior.</p>

<p>Mark Lemley, a leading patent and anti-trust expert at Stanford, <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/10/google-backlash-after-new-google-search-integration/" title="told ">told </a>the New York Times (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=NYT" class="ticker" title="NYT">NYSE: NYT</a>) that Google&#8217;s behavior is not abusive:</p>

<p>“It can’t be the rule that if Facebook says no, you can’t search our links, that Google can’t search its own links. That is not antitrust.”</p>

<p>Lemley has worked for Google in the past but on unrelated matters.</p>

<p>The upshot is that, in the case of social search, Google has abandoned its strongest defense to antitrust claims&#8212;that its results are objective&#8212;in order to rely on other arguments. Is it worth the risk?</p>

<p><strong>The Business Case</strong></p>

<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s no coincidence that Google unfurled &#8220;Search plus Your World&#8221; the same week as another big event for social networks.</p>

<p>Today, the first &#8220;<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/9006848/Facebook-adverts-now-in-news-feeds.html" title="sponsored stories">sponsored stories</a>&#8221; appeared in the news feeds of Facebook users. These &#8220;stories&#8221; are in fact ads based on products that a user or their friends have &#8220;Liked&#8217; in the past.</p>

<p>They also represent a gold mine that Google desperately wants a piece of. This appears to be why the company made the profound strategic shift to begin offering an altered set of results for its social search product. Only time will tell whether this will pay off with a shiny new revenue stream or if will it instead leave Google with a thinly-populated social network and a big regulatory headache.</p>

<p>My own take is that the biggest problem with Google&#8217;s initiative&#8212;and those of other tech behemoths like Facebook and Twitter&#8212;is not anti-trust but anti-transparency. People (and regulators) might feel much more comfortable with these companies if they bore a big sign in plain English that explained why they control the information the way they do.</p>

<p>Google might have had a smaller headache on its hand if the company had announced, &#8220;we are excluding Facebook and Twitter from the results because we want to build up our own social network&#8212;the rest of our search results are the same.&#8221; Instead, Google may have fueled another wave of paranoia and regulatory attention.</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
											<p><strong>Related</strong></p>
						<ul class="related">
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-google-shakes-up-search-results-with-new-your-world-feature/" title="Google Shakes Up Search Results With New 'Your World' Feature">Google Shakes Up Search Results With New 'Your World' Feature</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-did-google-go-too-far-mixing-social-and-search/" title="Did Google Go Too Far Mixing Social And Search?">Did Google Go Too Far Mixing Social And Search?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-the-story-behind-shopcity-and-its-antitrust-complaint-against-google/" title="The Story Behind ShopCity And Its Antitrust Complaint Against Google">The Story Behind ShopCity And Its Antitrust Complaint Against Google</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-eu-trouble-looms-for-google-as-lawsuit-seeks-31-million-over-adwords/" title="EU Trouble Looms For Google As Lawsuit Seeks $31 Million Over AdWords">EU Trouble Looms For Google As Lawsuit Seeks $31 Million Over AdWords</a></li>
</ul>

									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
									<category term="746" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Search"/>
							
									<category term="724" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Social Media"/>
							
									<category term="833" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Companies"/>
							
									<category term="888" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Facebook"/>
							
									<category term="898" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Google"/>
							
									<category term="1094" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Twitter"/>
							
						</entry>
	
		<entry>
			<title>F&#45;bombs And Bare Bottoms At The Supreme Court</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-f-bombs-and-bare-bottoms-at-the-supreme-court/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-01-10:article/419-f-bombs-and-bare-bottoms-at-the-supreme-court</id>
			<published>2012-01-10T13:39:28Z</published>
			<updated>2012-01-10T13:39:29Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Jeff Roberts</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/21598/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>The Supreme Court will hear today whether the FCC can punish broadcast networks for airing one-off cuss words and an actress&#8217;s derriere. The case has tawdry tidbits but also carries significant financial and creative implications for the broadcasters. Here&#8217;s a primer.
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>The Supreme Court will hear today whether the FCC can punish broadcast networks for airing one-off cuss words and an actress&#8217;s derriere. The case has tawdry tidbits but also carries significant financial and creative implications for the broadcasters. Here&#8217;s a primer.
</p><p><strong>What&#8217;s the big fuss about?</strong></p>

<p>In 2002, Cher tossed an f-bomb during the Billboard Music Awards on Fox (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=NWS" class="ticker" title="NWS">NSDQ: NWS</a>) and the next year Nicole Richie did the same and, for good measure, threw in the s-word. And in 2003, ABC (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=DIS" class="ticker" title="DIS">NYSE: DIS</a>) showed Charlotte Ross&#8217;s bare bottom on an episode of NYPD Blue. The FCC found that all of these incidents violated a broadcast ban on indecency between 6 am and 10 pm. It declined to fine Fox but did impose a $27,500 fine on ABC for each station and affiliate that showed the nudity, for a total of about $1.25 million.<br />
<strong><br />
This sounds familiar. Didn&#8217;t the Supreme Court already decide this?</strong></p>

<p>Yes, the court heard some of the same exact facts in 2009 in what became known as the <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2009-04-28-scotus-fcc-expletives_N.htm" title="&quot;fleeting expletives&quot; case">&#8220;fleeting expletives&#8221; case</a>. In a 5-4 decision, it ruled that the FCC had the power to sanction broadcasters for indecency over a single swear word, even if it was spontaneous and not planned by the broadcasters. The court did not hear the part about the actress&#8217; tush.<br />
<strong><br />
Why is the issue back at the court so soon?</strong></p>

<p>On the first go-around, the Justices looked at whether the law governing the FCC permitted the regulator to expand its policy to punish broadcasters for fleeting expletives. The broadcasters soon returned to court to try another tack, this time arguing that the policy violated the Constitution because it was too vague. The influential 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with them, meaning that the Supreme Court is now hearing many of the same facts&#8212;but this time looking at them in terms of the First Amendment.</p>

<p><strong>What does the FCC say?</strong></p>

<p>The FCC, fully backed by the Obama administration, says that it should be able to decide on a case-by-case basis when a single incident of swearing or nudity is indecent. It says this contextual approach is more effective than a blanket rule, especially as the broadcasters are sophisticated enough to know which acts cross the line. The government also says striking down the FCC policy could lead to graphic displays of oral sex, etc.</p>

<p><strong>What do the broadcasters say?</strong></p>

<p>ABC, Fox and others claim that the FCC&#8217;s current standard leaves them no idea what is indecent and what is not. They also say that the brief nudity in shows like NYPD Blue reflect a gritty realism, and that V-chips and warnings ensure that parents can prevent their children from seeing such scenes. The broadcasters also rely on a 1997 decision in which the Supreme Court struck down an attempt by Congress to regulate indecency on the internet.</p>

<p><strong>What&#8217;s at stake?</strong></p>

<p>For the broadcasters, a lot. The policy for them is not just a source of legal uncertainty. As the Wall Street Journal notes, the broadcasters would likely treat a victory as a license to introduce <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203436904577148731524813906.html" title="saltier content">saltier content</a> in the hopes of competing rough and realistic cable fare. In the bigger picture, there is the question of what to do about the spread of explicit material in society at large&#8212;does this mean that the FCC needs to be more vigilant than ever? Or is the regulator becoming irrelevant? <br />
<strong><br />
Based on last time, what&#8217;s going to happen?</strong></p>

<p>The ruling last time was 5-4 and the court&#8217;s composition has changed. Justice Antonin Scalia will have a hard time recreating his majority, <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/?p=135892" title="according">according</a> to Supreme Court veteran, Lyle Denniston. And this time, there will be only eight judges sitting (Justice Sonia Sotomayor recused herself). In the case of a tie, the 2nd Circuit ruling will stand&#8212;meaning the broadcasters win.<br />
<strong><br />
Where is a good place to read more about this?</strong></p>

<p>The venerable <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/" title="SCOTUS blog">SCOTUS blog</a> will have blog updates about the arguments which begin at 11 am. Reuters (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=TRI" class="ticker" title="TRI">NYSE: TRI</a>), Bloomberg and the major papers will also have coverage later in the day. 
</p>
											<p><strong>Related</strong></p>
						<ul class="related">
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-att-can-you-believe-those-guys-at-the-freaking-fcc/" title="AT&T: Can You Believe Those Guys At The Freaking FCC?">AT&T: Can You Believe Those Guys At The Freaking FCC?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/dc-roundup-fcc-nominees-net-neutrality-indecency/" title="D.C. Roundup: FCC Nominees, Net Neutrality, Indecency">D.C. Roundup: FCC Nominees, Net Neutrality, Indecency</a></li>
</ul>

									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
									<category term="696" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="FCC"/>
							
									<category term="700" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Media &amp; Publishing"/>
							
									<category term="709" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="TV"/>
							
									<category term="713" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Broadcast"/>
							
									<category term="833" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Companies"/>
							
									<category term="949" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="News Corp."/>
							
									<category term="953" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Fox"/>
							
						</entry>
	
		<entry>
			<title>Apple E&#45;book Conspiracy Case To Turn On &#39;Most Favored Nation&#39; Clause</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-apple-e-book-conspiracy-case-to-turn-on-most-favored-nation-clause/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-01-06:article/419-apple-e-book-conspiracy-case-to-turn-on-most-favored-nation-clause</id>
			<published>2012-01-06T13:36:48Z</published>
			<updated>2012-01-06T13:36:49Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Jeff Roberts</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/21598/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>Recent interviews shed light on how the antitrust cases against Apple (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=AAPL" class="ticker" title="AAPL">NSDQ: AAPL</a>) and book publishers will unfold. The e-book controversy will not turn directly on commission-style pricing, but instead on a form of contract that allows a retailer to get preferential treatment.
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>Recent interviews shed light on how the antitrust cases against Apple (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=AAPL" class="ticker" title="AAPL">NSDQ: AAPL</a>) and book publishers will unfold. The e-book controversy will not turn directly on commission-style pricing, but instead on a form of contract that allows a retailer to get preferential treatment.
</p><p>Recall that e-book prices are the subject of a massive lawsuit that seeks to reimburse consumers who allegedly overpaid. The case is underway in New York after a court consolidated dozens of class action suits from across the country. Justice Department and the European Union are also investigating e-book pricing.</p>

<p>According to <a href="http://www.dbmlawgroup.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=26&amp;Itemid=67" title="Andre Barlow">Andre Barlow</a>, a Washington antitrust expert and former Justice Department lawyer, the main issue at stake is Apple and the publishers&#8217; use of so-called &#8220;most favored nation&#8221; clauses to set pricing. The initial lawsuit says these clauses were part of the alleged conspiracy.</p>

<p>&#8220;Most favored nation&#8221; clauses are not illegal, and are used in a variety of industries such as medical services. They can take different forms but a common one can be summarized as &#8220;if we buy your supplies, you have to promise us that no other buyer will sell these at a lower price.&#8221; </p>

<p>But a lead lawyer for the class action plaintiffs says Apple and the publishers crossed a line in the way they used the clauses.</p>

<p>&#8220;The mfn clauses are significant restraints of trade and part of the anticompetitive acts we will attack,&#8221; wrote Steve Berman by email.</p>

<p>Barlow, the Washington lawyer, says that the clauses by themselves are not illegal and neither is &#8220;<a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-the-e-book-investigations-are-publishers-and-apple-breaking-the-law/" title="agency pricing,">agency pricing,</a>&#8221; the system of commissions which the publishers have adopted and which is standard practice for Apple for everything in its app store.</p>

<p>&#8220;This is just the way Apple does it - it says &#8216;you set the prices and we&#8217;ll take a cut&#8217;.&#8221; </p>

<p>But if the publishers and Apple also used a most favored nation clause with an intent to stop Amazon (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=AMZN" class="ticker" title="AMZN">NSDQ: AMZN</a>), &#8220;now we&#8217;re getting closer to price fixing.&#8221; The lawsuit claims that Apple wanted to hurt Amazon because it feared the Seattle retailer was going to use its Kindle to compete with the iPad.</p>

<p>An illegal agreement between Apple and the publishers&#8212;if there is one&#8212;would amount to vertical price-fixing which is a conspiracy between suppliers and retailers. Such cases have become rare after the Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that it is not automatically illegal for suppliers to set retail prices. </p>

<p>One of the few recent court cases involving vertical <a href="http://www.antitrustlawblog.com/2009/09/articles/what-a-babies-r-us-class-action-lawsuit-can-teach-us-about-successful-distribution-strategies-for-the-current-legal-and-economic-climate/" title="price-fixing involved Babies 'R' Us">price-fixing involved Babies &#8216;R&#8217; Us</a>. In 2008, a court found the company guilty of illegally coercing suppliers to fix prices on high-end baby products in order to put a squeeze on internet retailers.</p>

<p>The e-book situation is even more complicated because it also involves allegations of horizontal price-fixing (between the publishers) and includes other potential guilty parties like Amazon who objected to the situation but went along with it all the same.</p>

<p>The outcome of the case may shape the future of the publishing and e-retailing landscape but is unlikely to be decided anytime soon. The class action will be snarled in procedural matters for most of 2012 and government anti-trust investigations often take years.
</p>
											<p><strong>Related</strong></p>
						<ul class="related">
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-the-e-book-investigations-are-publishers-and-apple-breaking-the-law/" title="The E-book Investigations: Are Publishers And Apple Breaking The Law?">The E-book Investigations: Are Publishers And Apple Breaking The Law?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-a-closer-look-at-apples-role-in-the-e-book-conspiracy/" title="A Closer Look At Apple's Role In The E-book 'Conspiracy'">A Closer Look At Apple's Role In The E-book 'Conspiracy'</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-publishing-insider-tipped-law-firms-about-e-book-price-fixing-conspirac/" title="Publishing Insider Tipped Law Firms About E-Book Price Fixing Conspiracy">Publishing Insider Tipped Law Firms About E-Book Price Fixing Conspiracy</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-class-action-suit-against-apple-and-big-publishers-whats-in-it/" title="The Lawsuit Against Apple And Big Publishers: What's In It">The Lawsuit Against Apple And Big Publishers: What's In It</a></li>
</ul>

									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
									<category term="700" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Media &amp; Publishing"/>
							
									<category term="701" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Books"/>
							
									<category term="1219" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="e&#45;books"/>
							
									<category term="833" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Companies"/>
							
									<category term="849" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Apple"/>
							
						</entry>
	
		<entry>
			<title>BBC World Service To Run Ads On Some Websites And Radio Stations</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-bbc-world-service-to-run-ads-on-some-websites-and-radio-stations/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-01-05:article/419-bbc-world-service-to-run-ads-on-some-websites-and-radio-stations</id>
			<published>2012-01-05T16:35:18Z</published>
			<updated>2012-01-05T16:40:19Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Mark Sweney</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/15629/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>The BBC Trust has approved plans to run advertising on a number of BBC World Service websites as well as in radio broadcasts for the first time in the corporation&#8217;s history.
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>The BBC Trust has approved plans to run advertising on a number of BBC World Service websites as well as in radio broadcasts for the first time in the corporation&#8217;s history.
</p><p>BBC World Service has been given the green light to run ads on the Arabic, Russian and Spanish websites, which the trust says will put it &#8220;on a par with the BBC&#8217;s international-facing website BBC.com&#8221;.</p>

<p>The World Service, which has seen its budget slashed by £46m a year resulting in more than 600 job losses, has been asked by the government to generate £3m from commercial activities by 2013/2014.</p>

<p>Helen Boaden, the director of BBC News Group, presented two commercial proposals to the BBC Trust, according to minutes for a meeting on 17 November published on Thursday, that aim to go some way to supplement the grant-in-aid the BBC World Service receives from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.</p>

<p>Plans to launch advertising on BBC.com faced fierce criticism from some sectors of the media industry, nevertheless ads have been running on the website since late 2007.</p>

<p>The BBC Trust also rubber stamped a plan to launch a year-long pilot to run ads in World Service English programmes on its Berlin FM station.</p>

<p>If successful the pilot could pave the way for widespread advertising on BBC World Service radio services for the first time.</p>

<p>&#8220;We are adopting a careful and measured approach, with these proposals deliberately contained so we can assess how they work in practice,&#8221; said a spokesman for the BBC World Service. &#8220;While it could make a difference, this would only contribute a small proportion towards our overall funding.</p>

<p>&#8220;The BBC has a track record of managing commercial activity through BBC World News TV and the international BBC.com website, and the BBC&#8217;s reputation for providing impartial and independent news will always take precedence over wider commercial goals.&#8221;</p>

<p>The BBC World Service made about £4.6m from activities such as programme co-productions with third parties in the year to the of March 2011, however this is a behind-the-scenes activity users and listeners of the services would not have noticed, unlike advertising.
</p>
									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="659" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Advertising"/>
							
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
									<category term="833" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Companies"/>
							
									<category term="853" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="BBC"/>
							
							
						</entry>
	
		<entry>
			<title>Real Name Checks On Weibo Won&#39;t Come Cheap For Sina, Tencent</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-real-name-checks-on-weibos-wont-come-cheap-for-sina-tencent/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-01-05:article/419-real-name-checks-on-weibos-wont-come-cheap-for-sina-tencent</id>
			<published>2012-01-05T15:31:06Z</published>
			<updated>2012-01-05T15:51:08Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Steven Millward</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/22143/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>With it now certain that China’s popular Weibo (microblogging) services – prime among them being Sina’s (NASDAQ:SINA) and Tencent’s (HKG:0700) – will have to <a href="http://www.penn-olson.com/2011/12/16/beijing-says-real-names-to-be-required-for-microblogs/">implement real-name ID checks</a> in the coming months, it appears that the system will not come cheap.
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>With it now certain that China’s popular Weibo (microblogging) services – prime among them being Sina’s (NASDAQ:SINA) and Tencent’s (HKG:0700) – will have to <a href="http://www.penn-olson.com/2011/12/16/beijing-says-real-names-to-be-required-for-microblogs/">implement real-name ID checks</a> in the coming months, it appears that the system will not come cheap.
</p><p>Indeed, each single online check of a user’s name and national ID number will cost a rumored 2 RMB (US$0.20). And so for Sina (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=SINA" class="ticker" title="SINA">NSDQ: SINA</a>) and Tencent, the government-mandated checks could end up costing them hundreds of millions of RMB for <a href="http://www.penn-olson.com/2011/11/09/sina-weibo-breaks-250-million-users-but-how-many-are-real/">their 250 to 300 million Weibo users</a>.</p>

<p>But it was never going to come free. And it raises the complex issue of potential government ties to the company, called id5, that will process these real-name checks. That little-known company will be the prime beneficiary of these sixteen new regulations for microblogs. It is the government that charges the fee, but it’s id5 that will handle all the processing.</p>

<p>Sohu (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=SOHU" class="ticker" title="SOHU">NSDQ: SOHU</a>) IT reports that the Beijing-based Time (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=TWX" class="ticker" title="TWX">NYSE: TWX</a>) Weekly newspaper has tried repeatedly to question staff at the mysterious id5 about this, but journalists have been turned away.</p>

<p>If, say, 75 percent of Sina’s 250 million Weibo users turn out to be real people or companies – i.e. not spammers or <a href="http://www.penn-olson.com/2011/09/28/zombies-followers-weibo/">zombie accounts</a> – who wish to continue using the service, then all those checks would cost Sina a total of 375 million RMB (US$59 million).</p>

<h3>Being Held Accountable For Your Tweets</h3>

<p>The official line is that the real-ID clampdown will help stop false rumors (and maybe spam as well) spreading via the numerous Twitter-like services. But other analysts fear it’s a move to suppress free speech on these lively and increasingly popular sites. (Note that microblog users can still use cutesy and wacky nicknames – but Sina, Tencent, Netease (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=NTES" class="ticker" title="NTES">NSDQ: NTES</a>) (NASDAQ:NTES), and all those other operators, will have every user’s actual name and number on file).</p>

<p>These charges have been levied before, and industry insiders believe that Baidu (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=BIDU" class="ticker" title="BIDU">NSDQ: BIDU</a>) (NASDAQ:BIDU) had to pay up for its (failed and shuttered) microblog, <a href="http://www.penn-olson.com/tag/Shuoba/">Shuoba</a> – but that the search engine giant ended up paying more than the rumored 2 RMB that it’ll cost in 2012. It’s not clear if the real-name requirement deterred users, or if Shuoba simply failed to take off because it arrived too late to be a contender.</p>

<p>Sina’s and Tencent’s shares have been stable since the new regulations were outlined on December 16th – but the full pain of implementation has not yet begun. It will be costly for the companies, and could drive some users away from using any Weibo platform.</p>

<p>Follow this developing issue on our <a href="http://www.penn-olson.com/tag/real-name">‘real-name’ tag</a> as it becomes mandated on other areas of the Chinese web as well.</p>

<p>[Source: <a href="http://it.sohu.com/20120105/n331245594.shtml">Sohu IT</a> news (article in Chinese), via Bill Bishop’s <a href="http://digicha.com/index.php/2012/01/update-on-weibo-real-name-registration-and-associated-fees/">Digicha</a>]</p>

<p><br />
<em>» This article originally appeared on <a href="http://www.penn-olson.com/2012/01/05/weibo-real-name-check-fee/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+PennOlson+%28Penn+Olson+%7C+Techin.asia%29" title="Penn Olson, Asia Tech News For The World">Penn Olson, Asia Tech News For The World</a>, and is reproduced here with permission.</em>
</p>
									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
									<category term="724" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Social Media"/>
							
									<category term="727" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Nanopublishing"/>
							
									<category term="805" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Countries"/>
							
									<category term="806" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Asia"/>
							
									<category term="807" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="China"/>
							
							
							
						</entry>
	
		<entry>
			<title>Why The Canadian Government Wouldn&#39;t Block A RIM Takeover</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-why-the-canadian-government-wouldnt-block-a-rim-takeover/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-01-03:article/419-why-the-canadian-government-wouldnt-block-a-rim-takeover</id>
			<published>2012-01-03T15:00:31Z</published>
			<updated>2012-01-04T05:32:32Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Jeff Roberts</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/21598/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>Investors have been praying that an outside company will step in to catch the falling knife known as Research In Motion. But last week an influential publication threw cold water on those hopes, citing high hurdles to any potential takeover of the fading BlackBerry-maker.
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>Investors have been praying that an outside company will step in to catch the falling knife known as Research In Motion. But last week an influential publication threw cold water on those hopes, citing high hurdles to any potential takeover of the fading BlackBerry-maker.
</p><p>The report was astute in most respects. But it was wrong in suggesting that a RIM (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=RIMM" class="ticker" title="RIMM">NSDQ: RIMM</a>) takeover would meet stiff interference from the Government of Canada.</p>

<p>In a December 28 article, the New York Times&#8217; Dealbook <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/12/28/despite-rim-takeover-talk-hurdles-would-be-high/" title="reported">reported</a> that RIM&#8217;s share price had recently spiked amidst takeover rumors but that investors should be realistic about the obstacles to a sale. Dealbook perceived one of the chief obstacles as follows:</p>

<blockquote><p>RIM is also a point of pride for the Canadian government, which has been increasingly reluctant to let foreign companies buy major domestic corporations.</p></blockquote>

<p>Other publications reporting on a possible RIM takeover have since repeated that Canada might block a sale.</p>

<p>This speculation is unfounded. While the Canadian government can screen large transactions to ensure they are a &#8220;<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2010/10/28/f-foreign-investment-review-process.html" title="net benefit">net benefit</a>&#8221; to the country, it has used this power exactly twice since 1985.</p>

<p>The notion that the government has become more protectionist is based in Canada&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/04/business/global/04potash.html" title="decision">decision</a> to block an Australian mining giant from taking over the country&#8217;s main potash producer in 2010. That unusual decision was driven, however, by pressure from a regional government and political ally looking to preserve tax revenue.</p>

<p>There are no similar circumstances surrounding Research In Motion. Dealbook&#8217;s contention that RIM is a &#8220;point of pride&#8221; is true but only to the extent that Canadians have long cited BlackBerry to promote the fantasy that Canada is a global center of innovation.</p>

<p>Overall, the fact remains that Canada&#8217;s current government is ideologically in favor of free markets and would almost certainly allow RIM to be sold. Canadians might gasp but no more than they did when other national icons like Tim Hortons or the Montreal Canadiens hockey team were acquired by American interests. </p>

<p>Then there is the fact that Canadian investors are also being hurt by RIM&#8217;s current <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-why-rim-needed-to-fire-its-co-ceos-months-if-not-years-ago/" title="TweedleDum-TweedleDee management structure">TweedleDum-TweedleDee management structure</a>.</p>

<p>According to Stephen Scott, a professional investor and constitutional law expert at McGill University:</p>

<p>&#8220;My own guess is that sale of the whole of a crashing corporation (or sale of its assets) would not be blocked by the Government of Canada in the same way as has been (or would be) a rising enterprise. For one thing, too much pressure by desperate shareholders, who would be certain to go ballistic if blocked when trying to recover some of their investments.&#8221;</p>

<p>Dealbook cites real obstacles to the prayed-for sale of RIM, including the high price tag and the obstinance of its co-CEO&#8217;s. But political interference from Canada should be far from top of this list.</p>

<p>Other forms of help may be on the way, however. Sources are <a href="http://business.financialpost.com/2012/01/03/rim-leaning-toward-new-chairman-sources/" title="reporting">reporting</a> today that a management shake-up at the Waterloo, Ontario company may be on the way.
</p>
											<p><strong>Related</strong></p>
						<ul class="related">
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-why-rim-needed-to-fire-its-co-ceos-months-if-not-years-ago/" title="Why RIM Needed To Fire Its Co-CEOs Months, If Not Years Ago">Why RIM Needed To Fire Its Co-CEOs Months, If Not Years Ago</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-cant-anybody-here-play-this-game-rim-shamed-again-by-trademark-defeat/" title="Can't Anybody Here Play This Game? RIM Shamed Again By Trademark Defeat">Can't Anybody Here Play This Game? RIM Shamed Again By Trademark Defeat</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-rim-485-million-charge-on-playbook-surplus-admits-it-wont-make-targets/" title="RIM: $485 Million Charge On PlayBook Surplus, Admits It Won't Make Targets">RIM: $485 Million Charge On PlayBook Surplus, Admits It Won't Make Targets</a></li>
</ul>

									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
									<category term="715" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Mobile"/>
							
									<category term="833" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Companies"/>
							
									<category term="982" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="RIM"/>
							
							
						</entry>
	
		<entry>
			<title>What&#39;s Coming In 2012</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-whats-coming-in-2012/"/>
			<id>tag:contentnext.com,2012-01-03:article/419-whats-coming-in-2012</id>
			<published>2012-01-03T06:23:24Z</published>
			<updated>2012-01-03T06:33:26Z</updated>
			<author>
				<name>Amanda Natividad</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/member/11/</uri>
			</author>
			<contributor>
				<name>paidContent</name>
				<uri>http://paidcontent.org/</uri>
			</contributor>
			<rights>Copyright (c) 2012, paidContent</rights>
			<summary type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>Last week, the paidContent staff analyzed the sectors we cover most, highlighting the key people, companies and trends to watch in 2012. Some key topics: Apple (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=AAPL" class="ticker" title="AAPL">NSDQ: AAPL</a>), internet TVs, publishing, advertising, legal and the age of ubiquity. Below, links to our coverage:
</p>
				]]>	
			</summary>
			<content type="html">
				<![CDATA[
					
					<p>Last week, the paidContent staff analyzed the sectors we cover most, highlighting the key people, companies and trends to watch in 2012. Some key topics: Apple (<a href="http://finance.paidcontent.org/paidcontent?Page=QUOTE&Ticker=AAPL" class="ticker" title="AAPL">NSDQ: AAPL</a>), internet TVs, publishing, advertising, legal and the age of ubiquity. Below, links to our coverage:
</p><p><small><b>&#187;</b></small>&nbsp; <a href="/article/419-whats-coming-in-2012-the-age-of-ubiquity-for-some/" title="What’s Coming In 2012: The Age Of Ubiquity (For Some)" class="site_pc">What’s Coming In 2012: The Age Of Ubiquity (For Some)</a></p>

<p><small><b>&#187;</b></small>&nbsp; <a href="/article/419-whats-coming-in-2012-digital-advertising-up-close-and-personal/" title="What’s Coming In 2012: Digital Advertising, Up Close And Personal" class="site_pc">What’s Coming In 2012: Digital Advertising, Up Close And Personal</a></p>

<p><small><b>&#187;</b></small>&nbsp; <a href="/article/419-whats-coming-in-2012-the-content-industry-strikes-back/" title="What’s Coming In 2012: The Content Industry Strikes Back" class="site_pc">What’s Coming In 2012: The Content Industry Strikes Back</a></p>

<p><small><b>&#187;</b></small>&nbsp; <a href="/article/419-whats-coming-in-2012-internet-tvs-out-box-the-boxes/" title="What’s Coming In 2012: Internet TVs Out-Box The Boxes" class="site_pc">What’s Coming In 2012: Internet TVs Out-Box The Boxes</a></p>

<p><small><b>&#187;</b></small>&nbsp; <a href="/article/419-whats-coming-in-2012-book-publishing/" title="What’s Coming In 2012: Book Publishing" class="site_pc">What’s Coming In 2012: Book Publishing</a></p>

<p><small><b>&#187;</b></small>&nbsp; <a href="/article/419-whats-coming-in-2012-a-new-era-for-apple/" title="What’s Coming In 2012: A New Era For Apple" class="site_pc">What’s Coming In 2012: A New Era For Apple</a>
</p>
											<p><strong>Related</strong></p>
						<ul class="related">
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-whats-coming-in-2012-the-age-of-ubiquity-for-some/" title="What's Coming In 2012: The Age Of Ubiquity (For Some)">What's Coming In 2012: The Age Of Ubiquity (For Some)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-whats-coming-in-2012-digital-advertising-up-close-and-personal/" title="What's Coming In 2012: Digital Advertising, Up Close And Personal">What's Coming In 2012: Digital Advertising, Up Close And Personal</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-whats-coming-in-2012-the-content-industry-strikes-back/" title="What's Coming In 2012: The Content Industry Strikes Back">What's Coming In 2012: The Content Industry Strikes Back</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-whats-coming-in-2012-internet-tvs-out-box-the-boxes/" title="What's Coming In 2012: Internet TVs Out-Box The Boxes">What's Coming In 2012: Internet TVs Out-Box The Boxes</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-whats-coming-in-2012-book-publishing/" title="What's Coming In 2012: Book Publishing">What's Coming In 2012: Book Publishing</a></li>
<li><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-whats-coming-in-2012-a-new-era-for-apple/" title="What's Coming In 2012: A New Era For Apple">What's Coming In 2012: A New Era For Apple</a></li>
</ul>

									]]>
			</content>
			
									<category term="659" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Advertising"/>
							
									<category term="667" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Entertainment"/>
							
									<category term="1069" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Features"/>
							
									<category term="688" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Legal"/>
							
									<category term="694" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Regulatory"/>
							
									<category term="695" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="EC"/>
							
									<category term="700" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Media &amp; Publishing"/>
							
									<category term="1037" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="ContentNext Announcements"/>
							
									<category term="833" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Companies"/>
							
									<category term="849" scheme="http://paidcontent.org/topics" label="Apple"/>
							
							
							
							
						</entry>
	
</feed>
