<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>paidContent &#187; jupiterimages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/tag/jupiterimages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:12:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='paidcontent.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://paidcontent.org/osd.xml" title="paidContent" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://paidcontent.org/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>How Credit Crunch Shaved At Least $45 Million Off Jupiterimages&#8217; Sale To Getty Images</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/12/08/419-how-credit-crunch-shaved-off-at-least-45-million-off-jupiterimages-sale/</link>
		<comments>http://paidcontent.org/2008/12/08/419-how-credit-crunch-shaved-off-at-least-45-million-off-jupiterimages-sale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 07:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rafat Ali</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[getty images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jupiterimages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jupitermedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paidcontent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2008/12/08/419-how-credit-crunch-shaved-off-at-least-45-million-off-jupiterimages-sale/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Jupitermedia (NSDQ: JUPM) sold off its online images business to its larger rival Getty Images (NYSE: GYI) for $96 million in October,&#8230;<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=134683&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Jupitermedia (NSDQ: JUPM) sold off its online images business to its larger rival Getty Images (NYSE: GYI) for $96 million <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-second-try-proves-lucky-getty-buys-jupitermedias-online-images-unit-for" title="earlier in October">in October</a>, some people considered it second-time lucky for the company: Jupiter tried to sell its whole business to Getty in early 2007, but it fell apart then. But the latest sale was not without hitches, and in fact the credit crisis that ballooned in September-October may have shaved <b>almost $40 million to $45 million</b> off the final deal price, based on the deal proceedings disclosed in JUPM&#8217;s <a href="http://www.secinfo.com/d14D5a.t7y2p.htm" title="PREM14A filing">PREM14A filing</a> late last week. And while the <a href="http://www.secinfo.com/d14D5a.t7y2p.htm#3q83" title="back and forth">back and forth</a> is hard to summarize, some key points:</p>
<p>&#8211; Back in March 2007, when the first talks were held, Getty discussed buying its images business for about $388 million, but the talks were terminated soon after.<br />
&#8211; A year later, talks started again with Getty as well as three or four other bidders. And in April this year, a bidder came in with &#8220;verbal non-binding indication of interest&#8221; to <b>acquire the images business for approximately $185 million</b>, the filing discloses.<br />
&#8211; Merrill Lynch was retained as the banker from Jupitermedia&#8217;s side; they approached Getty again after two other parties became interested. Around May, Hellman &#038; Friedman Advisors, the PE firm that was in the process of buying Getty, indicated a deal could be done around the $200 million range.<br />
&#8211; Tons of back and forth among all bidders and JUPM over the next few months. JUPM had a chance to <b>potentially sell the business at around $145 million to Getty if it entered into a 45-days exclusivity period starting early August, but it didn&#8217;t</b>, and continued talking to others. Some bidders wanted to buy pieces of the images business for between $65 million and $90 million&#8230;some of these deals were also contingent on the bidders getting funding from other PE firms.<br />
&#8211; As the market continues to worsen, the bid price went lower, on Sept. 24,  Jonathan Klein, CEO of Getty Images, communicated to Meckler that they were <b>reducing the price to $120 million, &#8220;based on the state of the credit and acquisition finance markets</b>.&#8221;<br />
&#8211; On Oct 16, Getty went as low as $75 million, &#8220;citing difficulty in securing borrowed funds under Getty Images</p>
<br />  <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=134683&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><p><a href="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=22649"><img src="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ad?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=22649" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paidcontent.org/2008/12/08/419-how-credit-crunch-shaved-off-at-least-45-million-off-jupiterimages-sale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4f3860069d181dbeeb398304f5940a9e?s=96&#38;d=retro&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gigaedit</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Second Try Proves Lucky: Getty Buys Jupitermedia&#8217;s Online Images Unit For $96 Million</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/10/23/419-second-try-proves-lucky-getty-buys-jupitermedias-online-images-unit-for/</link>
		<comments>http://paidcontent.org/2008/10/23/419-second-try-proves-lucky-getty-buys-jupitermedias-online-images-unit-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Kaplan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[getty images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jupiterimages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jupitermedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m&a & venture capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paidcontent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venture capital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2008/10/23/419-second-try-proves-lucky-getty-buys-jupitermedias-online-images-unit-for/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the second time proves to be lucky: Jupitermedia has sold its online images business to its larger rival Getty Images for $96 million in&#8230;<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=141126&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the second time proves to be lucky: <a href="http://www.jupitermedia.com" title="Jupitermedia">Jupitermedia</a> has sold its online images business to its larger rival <a href="http://www.gettyimages.com/Home.aspx" title="Getty Images">Getty Images</a> for $96 million in cash. The first time Getty (NYSE: GYI) tried to buy JUPM&#8217;s images business, in February 2007, the deal <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-jupitermedia-postpones-earnings-after-possible-getty-sale-evaporates" title="ended in a disaster">fell apart</a>. This new deal is centered on a definitive stock purchase agreement, and Alan Meckler, Jupitermedia&#8217;s chairman and CEO, and others, who collectively hold about 35.9 percent in Jupitermedia (NSDQ: JUPM), have agreed to vote in favor of the deal. Meckler said the deal will allow the New York-based company to pay off all its bank debt. </p>
<p>Jupiter&#8217;s images division had revenues of $8.9 million in the last reported quarter (Q208), and operating profits of $7.2 million.</p>
<p>Getty itself is now a private company, after it was bought by PE Firm Hellman &#038; Friedman for $2.4 billion <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-getty-images-selling-to-pe-firm-hellman-friedman-for-24-billion" title="earlier this year">earlier this year</a>.</p>
<p>In the meantime, Meckler said Jupitermedia will focus more on developing its online media division. That unit is comprised of five distinct networks: <a href="http://www.internet.com/" title="internet.com">internet.com</a> and <a href="http://www.earthweb.com/" title="EarthWeb.com">EarthWeb.com</a>, which are aimed at IT professionals; <a href="http://www.devx.com/" title="DevX.com">DevX.com</a> for developers; and <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/" title="Mediabistro.com">Mediabistro.com</a> and <a href="http://graphics.com/" title="Graphics.com">Graphics.com</a> for media and creative professionals. Earlier this year, Jupitermedia began pushing the music side of its business hard with <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-jupitermedia-acquires-estockmusic-second-royalty-free-music-buy" title="a number of acquisitions">a number of acquisitions</a>, including <a href="http://www.estockmusic.com/" title="eStockMusic">eStockMusic</a>, a royalty-free music site, and <a href="http://www.flyinghandsmusic.com/" title="Flying Hands Music">Flying Hands Music</a>, which also has its own library of royalty-free tracks. <a href="http://www.jupitermedia.com/corporate/releases/08.10.23-JM_JupImagesSale.html" title="Release">Release</a></p>
<br />  <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=141126&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><p><a href="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=485235"><img src="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ad?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=485235" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paidcontent.org/2008/10/23/419-second-try-proves-lucky-getty-buys-jupitermedias-online-images-unit-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4f3860069d181dbeeb398304f5940a9e?s=96&#38;d=retro&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gigaedit</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
