<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>paidContent &#187; the cw</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/tag/the-cw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:34:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='paidcontent.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://paidcontent.org/osd.xml" title="paidContent" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://paidcontent.org/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>How Netflix really did save the CW</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2012/05/30/how-netflix-really-did-save-the-cw/</link>
		<comments>http://paidcontent.org/2012/05/30/how-netflix-really-did-save-the-cw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 23:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Frankel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ted sarandos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the cw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=209949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With around 18 percent of its audience consuming its programs on digital platforms, the CW has emerged as broadcast TV's most innovative network in terms of tracking and monetizing digital viewers. But without that billion dollars from Netflix, where would it be?<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=209949&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His streaming service has been blamed by many in the media industry for contributing mightily to the<a href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/26/weve-got-hard-data-netflix-really-is-killing-nickelodeon/"> ratings demise of kids channel Nickelodeon</a>. But Netflix content chief Ted Sarandos told a business conference Wednesday that syndication of TV content on the service has done far more to help networks than hurt them.</p>
<p><a href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/05/30/how-netflix-really-did-save-the-cw/cw-life-preserver/" rel="attachment wp-att-209950"><img  title="CW-life preserver" src="http://gigaompaidcontent.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/cw-life-preserver.jpeg?w=300&#038;h=150" alt="" width="300" height="150" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-209950" /></a>In fact, speaking at the Nomura 2nd Annual U.S. Media &amp; Telecom Summit in New York, Sarandos stopped just short of saying that Netflix&#8217;s <a href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/10/13/419-netflix-goes-for-fountain-of-youth-with-full-season-cw-deal/">four-year, $1 billion deal</a> with the CW&#8217;s parents, Time Warner and CBS Corp, has saved the broadcast network from extinction.</p>
<p>&#8220;What&#8217;s important to note is that you look at programming at CW, Netflix license fees makes that content profitable,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Without it, it was struggling along.&#8221;</p>
<p>Did Netflix really save an entire broadcast network? Well, based on the just-released dire ratings data for CW from last season, the jury is still out on that. But as the network seeks to stabilize its linear TV ratings situation as it transitions itself into broadcast TV&#8217;s first true multi-platform programming institution, those Netflix dollars &#8212; as well as revenue culled from a <a href="http://paidcontent.org/2011/10/29/419-cw-cuts-another-streaming-deal-current-season-shows-to-hulu-hulu-plus/">separate streaming deal with Hulu Plus</a>  &#8212; are proving pivotal.</p>
<p><strong>Broadcast TV&#8217;s most innovative model</strong></p>
<p>The CW targets a much narrower audience than the Big Four networks (ABC, CBS, Fox and NBC), primarily going after young women 18-34 with shows like <em>Vampire Diaries</em> and <em>Heart of Dixie</em>. But while its scale is much smaller, the network presents a very forward looking model for the television industry.</p>
<p>Simply put, CW&#8217;s audience is migrating to digital platforms at a faster rate than viewership for the Big Four networks. And CW is innovating its monetization strategy at a quicker pace as a result.</p>
<p>&#8220;Their demographic is much more cutting-edge, demanding and fickle,&#8221; noted Bill Carroll, a senior analyst for Katz Media, a firm which advises TV stations on programming decisions.</p>
<p>In fact, CW digital chief Rick Haskins told paidContent Tuesday that the network received 18 percent of its viewership during the just-completed 2011-12 TV season from digital platforms.</p>
<p>&#8220;When you&#8217;re bumping up on 20 percent of your viewing being someplace else, you&#8217;re model has to be different,&#8221; Haskins said.</p>
<p>For CW, that &#8220;different model&#8221; means limiting the differentiation between broadcast and streaming for both viewers and advertisers.</p>
<p>While Fox delays free streaming availability of its shows for eight days after initial linear airing, CW has <a href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/03/15/419-what-the-cws-about-face-on-streaming-says-about-piracy-authentication/">cut that wait time down to just eight hours</a> on its <a href="http://www.CWTV.com">CWTV.com</a> channel.</p>
<p>The CW has been putting full TV-like commercial loads into its streams for several years and <a href="http://adage.com/article/media/advertising-cw-study-viewers-watch-full-web-video-ads/146669/">pushes harder than any other network</a> to integrate the sale of impressions on its digital platforms with those on its linear channel to advertisers.</p>
<p>While ratings have trended down for the network recently, ad sales have not. During last year&#8217;s upfront market, for example, the CW generated nearly $420 million in ad revenue, which was 10 percent year-over-year growth.</p>
<p>Having worked to create its own systems of measuring viewership across platforms for several years, network president Mark Pedowitz told advertisers during the CW upfront presentation two weeks ago that the company will soon introduce its own fully-baked cross-platform ratings system to the TV industry.</p>
<p>Almost in the same breath, Pedowitz touted a <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/cw-digital-studio-cwd-326165">new digital studio</a> that will specialize in low-cost, short-form digital content, extending the CW brand mobile platforms in a way no other network has attempted.</p>
<p><strong>About those ratings&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>But as the CW transitions into a next-generation, multi-platform video programmer, it can&#8217;t surrender the underpinnings of its traditional business model &#8212; drawing viewers to its affiliate broadcast stations, which still accounts for more than 80 percent of its viewership.</p>
<p>And right now, that part of the business isn&#8217;t going well.</p>
<p>On Friday, ratings tracker Nielsen revealed that for the just-completed 2011-12 TV season, CW&#8217;s primetime usage dipped 15 percent to an average of only around 1.5 million watchers. Viewership for the network&#8217;s target demographic, adults 18-34, dropped 20 percent to 800,000.</p>
<p>With ratings like these, how can the network&#8217;s affiliate partners survive, much less negotiate hefty retransmission fees with cable and satellite operators?</p>
<p>It is here where the Netflix licensing deal has helped tremendously, delivering the network &#8212; which had previously struggled to sell its shows to cable and syndication &#8212; back-end resources for the first time.</p>
<p>Rather than having to further cut back on the number of fresh, original programming it will supply to its affiliates next season &#8212; thus further dropping ratings &#8212; CW announced that it will have 50 additional hours of original series on the air next year and will be able to supply original programming during the summer for the first time.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;ve taken the money and put it back into supporting the model,&#8221; Haskins noted.</p>
<p><em>Here&#8217;s former CW president Dawn Ostroff discussing the Netflix deal with paidContent editor Staci Kramer last year:</em><br />
<iframe src="http://blip.tv/play/gZ5Ggt3jEAI.html?p=1" frameborder="0" width="480" height="345"></iframe><object style="display: none;" width="320" height="240" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://a.blip.tv/api.swf#gZ5Ggt3jEAI" /><embed style="display: none;" width="320" height="240" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://a.blip.tv/api.swf#gZ5Ggt3jEAI" /></object></p>
<br />  <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=209949&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><p><a href="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=525525"><img src="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ad?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=525525" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paidcontent.org/2012/05/30/how-netflix-really-did-save-the-cw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://gigaompaidcontent.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/cw-life-preserver.jpeg?w=150" />
		<media:content url="http://gigaompaidcontent.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/cw-life-preserver.jpeg?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">CW-life preserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/826132076c2dfd9ff7c365463fc107bc?s=96&#38;d=retro&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dannyfrankel</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://gigaompaidcontent.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/cw-life-preserver.jpeg?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">CW-life preserver</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Increasing Commercials Really &#8216;Ad&#8217; Up Online for The CW?</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2010/10/26/419-does-increasing-commercials-really-ad-up-online-for-the-cw1/</link>
		<comments>http://paidcontent.org/2010/10/26/419-does-increasing-commercials-really-ad-up-online-for-the-cw1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 03:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Wallenstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media & publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paidcontent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the cw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2010/10/26/419-does-increasing-commercials-really-ad-up-online-for-the-cw1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps The CW has good reason to crow about new data indicating the high percentages of viewers who are watching commercials to completion&#8230;<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=154875&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps The CW has good reason to crow about <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=146669" title="new data">new data</a> indicating the high percentages of viewers who are watching commercials to completion despite the increased ad loads the broadcast network is experimenting with this fall in online streams of full episodes. But it feels a bit like a prison surveying inmates in solitary confinement about the gruel being slid under the door and concluding &#8212; voila! &#8212; they really enjoy the cuisine!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s because while an impressive-sounding 95 percent of the ads are being watched from beginning to end, it&#8217;s not like viewers have any choice. While the stat conjures up images of an online audience increasingly enraptured by a multiplying supply of commercials rather than just one per break, it&#8217;s worth noting that if viewers want to get through an episode of, say, <em>Gossip Girl</em>, there&#8217;s no fast-forwarding or changing the channel possible online unlike the way those options are available on TV. If you want to get through the episode, you have to let the ads play.</p>
<p>While CW can congratulate itself that the audience didn&#8217;t reject the increased ad load, it&#8217;s probably not the case that they enjoyed it, either. The more telling stats to come concern engagement: did viewers actually click on the ads to find out more about the products? It&#8217;s quite possible that while they didn&#8217;t close out of the video window, they just opened their Facebook or some other diversion in another window only to click back in once the audio from the commercial indicated the episode resumed.</p>
<p>It should come as no surprise that CW is trumpeting the findings considering its declaration heading into the upfront marketplace earlier this year that it would boost online ad volume as part of a move to <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&#038;art_aid=125069" title="combine TV and online sales">combine TV and online sales</a>. Doubling the commercials may actually be just the beginning of what&#8217;s to come if Nielsen&#8217;s long-delayed <a href="http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/media/e3id8b4313a40c3bc11e995ff8e8b7c7c8b" title="Extended Screen Initiative">Extended Screen Initiative</a> finally gets off the ground; that would track identical TV and online feeds. That would mean even more ads online.</p>
<p>Most interestingly, CW is stepping up its online strategy just as its fellow broadcasters appear to be shrinking from the challenge. That&#8217;s because of the <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2010-10-25-online-tv_N.htm" title="increasing evidence">increasing evidence</a> that negotiation-bruised Fox et al may take cues from their cable brethren and begin limiting the amount of ad-supported streaming they do in pursuit of retransmission fees. If it&#8217;s not too careful, CW could end up more of an outlier than an innovator.</p>
<br />  <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=154875&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><p><a href="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=452544"><img src="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ad?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=452544" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paidcontent.org/2010/10/26/419-does-increasing-commercials-really-ad-up-online-for-the-cw1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://gigaompaidcontent.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/gossip-girl-o.jpg?w=118" />
		<media:content url="http://gigaompaidcontent.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/gossip-girl-o.jpg?w=118" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Gossip Girl</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4f3860069d181dbeeb398304f5940a9e?s=96&#38;d=retro&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gigaedit</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CW Launching WAP Site For Full-Length TV Shows</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/09/02/419-cw-launching-wap-site-for-full-length-tv-shows/</link>
		<comments>http://paidcontent.org/2008/09/02/419-cw-launching-wap-site-for-full-length-tv-shows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Kapko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media & publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moconews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the cw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2008/09/02/419-cw-launching-wap-site-for-full-length-tv-shows/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CW network is taking most of its programming mobile this season on a new WAP site that<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=138114&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CW network is taking most of its programming mobile this season on a new <a href="http://wap.cwtv.com" title="WAP site">WAP site</a> that</p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/gigaompaidcontent.wordpress.com/138114/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/gigaompaidcontent.wordpress.com/138114/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=138114&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><p><a href="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=291208"><img src="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ad?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=291208" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paidcontent.org/2008/09/02/419-cw-launching-wap-site-for-full-length-tv-shows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4f3860069d181dbeeb398304f5940a9e?s=96&#38;d=retro&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gigaedit</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CW Reverses Itself: New Gossip Girl Episodes Coming Back To The Site; Top Ad Exec Leaves For MLB Net</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/07/23/419-cw-reverses-itself-gossip-girl-episodes-back-on-the-site/</link>
		<comments>http://paidcontent.org/2008/07/23/419-cw-reverses-itself-gossip-girl-episodes-back-on-the-site/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 03:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Kaplan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable & telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gossip girl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry moves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media & publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paidcontent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technologies / formats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the cw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2008/07/23/419-cw-reverses-itself-gossip-girl-episodes-back-on-the-site/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in April, The CW network said it would no longer stream new episodes of its most successful show, Gossip Girl, on its site. The TV netw&#8230;<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=135735&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://paidcontent.org/images/uploads/gossipgirl.jpg" alt="image"  width="140" height="185" class=" alignright" />Back in April, The CW network said it would <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-gossip-girl-streams-pulled-off-cws-site-due-to-well-popularity-cannibal" title="no longer stream episodes">no longer stream new episodes</a> of its most successful show, <i>Gossip Girl</i>, on its site. The TV network is now reversing that decision and will begin showing first-run <i>Gossip Girl</i> streams online when the new season starts on September 1, <a href="http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/07/gossip_girl_again_streaming_on.php" title="TVWeek reported">TVWeek reported</a>. At the time, The CW was concerned that viewers weren&#8217;t watching the show on TV and so, hoping to bump up ratings, it pulled new shows off the web as last season was winding down. In the meantime, it turned out that ratings did not get a boost. Instead, the show&#8217;s fans were outraged, despite the fact that they could have bought original episodes on iTunes &#8212; which will still be available in the Apple (NSDQ: AAPL) download store even when they return to streaming on CWTV.com.</p>
<p>&#8211; <b>Top ad exec departs for MLB cable net</b>: It will take more than <i>Gossip Girl</i> to fix what ails the CW, which is jointly owned by CBS Corp (NYSE: CBS). and Time Warner (NYSE: TWX). <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121673784491973721.html?mod=yahoo_hs&#038;ru=yahoo" title="WSJ">WSJ</a>, citing unidentified sources, says that the network is losing Bill Morningstar, its head of ad sales. Morningstar, a popular figure with media buyers, is said to be heading to Major League Baseball&#8217;s new cable startup, which is set to go live on Jan. 1.</p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/gigaompaidcontent.wordpress.com/135735/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/gigaompaidcontent.wordpress.com/135735/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=135735&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><p><a href="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=94642"><img src="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ad?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=94642" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paidcontent.org/2008/07/23/419-cw-reverses-itself-gossip-girl-episodes-back-on-the-site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4f3860069d181dbeeb398304f5940a9e?s=96&#38;d=retro&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gigaedit</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://paidcontent.org/images/uploads/gossipgirl.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">image</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gossip Girl Streams Pulled Off CW&#8217;s Site Due To, Well, Popularity; Cannibalization Fears</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2008/04/18/419-gossip-girl-streams-pulled-off-cws-site-due-to-well-popularity-cannibal/</link>
		<comments>http://paidcontent.org/2008/04/18/419-gossip-girl-streams-pulled-off-cws-site-due-to-well-popularity-cannibal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rafat Ali</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best buy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cablevision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gossip girl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media & publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbc universal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paidcontent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playboy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spotify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the cw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warner bros.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warner music group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.wp.gostage.it/2008/04/18/419-gossip-girl-streams-pulled-off-cws-site-due-to-well-popularity-cannibal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This could go down as the most bone-headed move from a TV network in 2008, or completely inconsequential: The CW network is pulling off its&#8230;<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=131407&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/13736953@N00/2422026767/" title="2402460833_772437f955_o by Rafat Ali, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3184/2422026767_5e56fc0c3f_m.jpg"  border="0" width="183" height="240" alt="2402460833_772437f955_o" class=" alignright" /></a>This could go down as the most bone-headed move from a TV network in 2008, or completely inconsequential: The CW network is pulling off its website the one show that is at least keeping it in the news. It said today that episodes of its series &#8220;<a href="http://www.cwtv.com/shows/gossip-girl" title="Gossip Girl">Gossip Girl</a>&#8221; will not be streamed on CWTV.com when it returns this Monday with original episodes, through  to this season&#8217;s end. The first 12 episodes of the season, which will remain on the site, were made available free to viewers about a week after their original airdate, <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/business/news/e3iaeef0c1a4b6820825437c02f2795ac14" title="reports THR">reports THR</a>.</p>
<p>The show&#8217;s audience is younger, which would naturally leans towards watching more video and shows online than other demos. The move is being done &#8220;as an experiment&#8221; to figure out if its online window is cannibalizing the TV audience. The show is as popular online, and each episode is generating hundreds of thousands of streams, the story says&#8230;it is among the most downloaded TV shows on iTunes (where also will continue to offer new episodes, for a price, of course). More power to BitTorrent, of course&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-gossip18apr18,1,1364751.story" title="LAT">LAT</a>: The move is designed to boost ratings for the program, which has developed a loyal online following <b>but has failed to attract a sizable TV audience</b>. The show&#8217;s average of 2.5 million viewers has not been enough to lift CW out of the ratings cellar or staunch its financial losses.</p>
<p>Another way of looking at it, <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/04/17/cw-network-uses-sex-then-internet-to-promote-gossip-girl/3390" title="from TvbytheNumbers">from TvbytheNumbers</a>: &#8220;Now CW is using the Internet to promote the show in a way that might seem very strange, but probably isn</p>
<br /><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/categories/gigaompaidcontent.wordpress.com/131407/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/tags/gigaompaidcontent.wordpress.com/131407/" /> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=131407&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><p><a href="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=381685"><img src="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ad?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=381685" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paidcontent.org/2008/04/18/419-gossip-girl-streams-pulled-off-cws-site-due-to-well-popularity-cannibal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/4f3860069d181dbeeb398304f5940a9e?s=96&#38;d=retro&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gigaedit</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3184/2422026767_5e56fc0c3f_m.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">2402460833_772437f955_o</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
