<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>paidContent &#187; videonuze</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paidcontent.org/tag/videonuze/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paidcontent.org</link>
	<description>The economics of digital content</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:29:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='paidcontent.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://paidcontent.org/osd.xml" title="paidContent" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://paidcontent.org/?pushpress=hub'/>
	<item>
		<title>TV ad dollars slow to move online &#8212; video ads to hit $5.9B by 2017, says report</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/06/10/tv-ad-dollars-slow-to-move-online-video-ads-5-9b-by-2017-says-report/</link>
		<comments>http://paidcontent.org/2013/06/10/tv-ad-dollars-slow-to-move-online-video-ads-5-9b-by-2017-says-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 22:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff John Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newfronts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online-advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videonuze]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=230786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The growth in online video shows means more alternatives to TV than ever before -- but advertising dollars are stubbornly sticking with the older medium. <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=230786&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the future of television land, everyone from AOL to the <a href="http://paidcontent.org/2013/05/02/pretty-enough-for-tv-conde-nast-and-wall-street-journal-strut-for-online-video-dollars/"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> will be making awesome online shows and sponsors will ply them with ad budgets once reserved for TV. And why not? After all, online audiences are growing fast and might provide much better marketing opportunities.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s just one problem &#8212; it won&#8217;t happen anytime soon. According to consulting firm PwC&#8217;s <a href="http://paidcontent.org/2013/06/05/what-digital-media-will-look-like-in-2017-more-highlights-from-pwcs-report/">annual media report</a>, online video will increase from $2.3 billion in 2012 to $5.9 billion by 2017. The figure represents 9 percent of future online ad spending, but this is still a small amount compared to TV ads &#8212; which PwC predicts will pull in $81.6 billion, or 37 percent of <em>all</em> ad dollars in 2017 (the figure includes ads &#8220;around broadcasters TV content&#8221; so adjust accordingly.)</p>
<p>This slow growth forecast jibes with the assessment of industry experts who spoke at a VideoNuze <a href="http://videosummit2013.videonuze.com/">ad event</a> last week in New York City. Their explanation was simple enough &#8212; brands already feel their budgets are spread thin by TV and they&#8217;re not in a mood to experiment.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you followed viewers across all screens, we’d have to add at least 70 percent to the budget &#8230; our clients say &#8216;we don’t have have any more money and everything’s more expensive,&#8217;&#8221; said Michael Bologna, Director of Emerging Communications at GroupM.</p>
<p>Bologna and Digitas&#8217; SVP of Media, Adam Schlachter, both said that media companies&#8217; recent &#8220;<a href="http://paidcontent.org/2013/05/04/newfronts-news-roundup-a-big-week-for-yahoo-aol-blip-hulu-and-crackle/">NewFronts</a>&#8221; in New York (a boozy, glitzy preview of new shows intended to resemble the Upfronts in LA), had at best &#8220;sparked a conversation&#8221; but did not lead to any resolutions to turn on the cash spigots.</p>
<p>The main problem, for now, appears to be a lack of consensus on how to measure the effectiveness of online video ads. Here&#8217;s how PwC puts it:</p>
<blockquote id="quote-there-are-challenges"><p><span style="font-size:13px;line-height:19px;">There are [..] challenges facing audience-measurement researchers seeking to provide more accurate data for their clients: &#8230;Until progress is made on these, migration of advertising revenues from traditional TV to online video platforms will lag consumer adoption of these new services.</span></p></blockquote>
<p>The ongoing status quo (whatever its cause) appeared to frustrate at least one audience member at the VideoNuze event, who demanded that someone explain why TV stations charged more even as they bring brand messages to fewer people.</p>
<p>&#8220;We don’t want to pay the failure tax any more. It should be more like the stock market [where value declines with performance]. The agency must say, if your audience goes down, you get less.&#8221;</p>
<p>The panel host, Forrester&#8217;s Jim Nail, suggested a culture of risk aversion may explain the status quo: &#8220;Nobody gets fired for buying ABC, NBC, CBS and Fox.”</p><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=230786&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><p><a href="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=554094"><img src="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ad?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=554094" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paidcontent.org/2013/06/10/tv-ad-dollars-slow-to-move-online-video-ads-5-9b-by-2017-says-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://gigaom2.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/shutterstock_112693879-1.jpg?w=150" />
		<media:content url="http://gigaom2.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/shutterstock_112693879-1.jpg?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">TV, bored, watching tv</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/05dfcf765f1554b08954bb9e1ee63363?s=96&#38;d=retro&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jeffjohnroberts</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New report says video ads are soaring &#8212; but only 5% are on mobile</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/13/new-report-says-video-ads-are-soaring-but-only-5-are-on-mobile/</link>
		<comments>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/13/new-report-says-video-ads-are-soaring-but-only-5-are-on-mobile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff John Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online-video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videonuze]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paidcontent.org/?p=224668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online video ads are growing at a rapid rate but almost all of them are appearing on the desktop. Here's some stats that also include a look at video ads on mobile and connected TV.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=224668&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New ad industry figures claim the number of online video ads shown in the last quarter of 2012 grew an eye-popping 52 percent compared to the previous three months. This stat shows that TV dollars may be shifting to the web in force; this could also come as good news for publishers who are counting on high-value video ads to prop up their bottom line.</p>
<p>The figure was supplied by Videology, a provider of ad tools to agencies and marketers, and comes with a nifty graphic (<a href="http://www.videonuze.com/article/videology-s-q4-12-infographic-breaks-down-online-video-ad-market">via VideoNuze</a>) that shows a snapshot of the industry. Highlights include a growing range of sectors that are buying video ads and increased use of behavioral data to target ads.</p>
<p>The other significant part of the report is that the vast majority of video ads ares still served on the desktop:</p>
<p><a href="http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/13/new-report-says-video-ads-are-soaring-but-only-5-are-on-mobile/screen-shot-2013-02-13-at-3-32-50-pm/" rel="attachment wp-att-224674"><img  alt="Videology screenshot" src="http://gigaompaidcontent.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/screen-shot-2013-02-13-at-3-32-50-pm.png?w=708"   class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-224674" /></a></p>
<p>Videology said in an email that the mobile&#8217;s share of overall video ads  grew one percent in the previous quarter and that the overall growth in video means mobile is expanding rapidly. <a href="http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/12/google-stands-by-decision-to-end-tablet-based-ad-campaigns/">Unlike Google</a>, Videology continues to consider tablets like the iPad as a mobile, not desktop, device for ad purposes.</p>
<p>The third category &#8212; &#8220;Connected TV&#8221; &#8212; refers to pre-roll video ads served on devices like Roku, Apple TV and Xbox. The 3 percent figure is up from 1 percent the quarter before.</p>
<p>These numbers shouldn&#8217;t be treated as gospel, of coure, as Videology has a stake in the video ad industry. But the company&#8217;s broad connections to marketers, publishers and agencies do give it a good big-picture view.</p>
<p>Going forward, it will be interesting to watch how quickly the above desktop-to-video ratio changes to reflect a world in which half of all internet viewing is expected to take place on mobile devices. At the same time, publishers will be watching closely to see if video ads can hold their high value as more inventory comes on the market.</p>
<p><em>(Image by <a id="portfolio_link" href="http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-349147p1.html">cybrain</a> via Shutterstock)</em></p><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=224668&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><p><a href="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=548123"><img src="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ad?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=548123" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paidcontent.org/2013/02/13/new-report-says-video-ads-are-soaring-but-only-5-are-on-mobile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://gigaompaidcontent.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/shutterstock_95561590.jpg?w=150" />
		<media:content url="http://gigaompaidcontent.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/shutterstock_95561590.jpg?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">online video, mobile video</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/05dfcf765f1554b08954bb9e1ee63363?s=96&#38;d=retro&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jeffjohnroberts</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://gigaompaidcontent.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/screen-shot-2013-02-13-at-3-32-50-pm.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Videology screenshot</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aereo CEO: Our cheap TV wouldn&#8217;t exist without cloud computing</title>
		<link>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/05/aereo-ceo-our-cheap-tv-wouldnt-exist-without-cloud-computing/</link>
		<comments>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/05/aereo-ceo-our-cheap-tv-wouldnt-exist-without-cloud-computing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff John Roberts]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aereo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chet-kanojia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videonuze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videoschmooze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[will richmond]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/?p=591263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aereo, a TV-on-the-go service that relies on small antennas, is getting a lot of legal attention. The bigger story should be how it is using economic breakthroughs in computing to offer a new form of TV.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=221700&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The legal controversy surrounding TV-on-the-go service <a href="https://aereo.com/">AEREO</a> is interesting &#8212; but not nearly as much as the blend of technology that gave rise to the company in the first place.</p>
<p>Aereo is a service that lets people watch live TV anywhere they go by renting them a personal antenna that beams shows to their phones, laptops or tablets. The service, which can be bought for $1 a day, is getting lots of attention because big broadcasters are suing try to <a href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/03/21/419-aereo-tv-will-stream-for-months-as-court-case-simmers/">sue it out of it existence</a>.</p>
<p>Speaking in New York on Wednesday, Aereo CEO Chet Kanojia explained that the service is only possible because of a &#8220;perfect storm&#8221; of technology advances that have dramatically lowered the costs of broadcasting and subscriber acquisition.</p>
<p>For example, Kanojia pointed to Aereo&#8217;s &#8220;antenna farm&#8221; in Brooklyn. The site hosts thousands of mini-antennas, each about the size of a dime, that subscribers in New York can rent on a <a href="https://aereo.com/plans">daily or monthly</a> basis. The technology, which offers a combined TV/DVR service, is so compact that Aereo can fit 50,000 pairs of antennas in just 200 vertical square feet.<a href="http://gigaom.com/video/aereo-doubles-dvr-storage-to-80-hours/aereo-dime-size-antenna/" rel="attachment wp-att-541792"><img  alt="Aereo Dime Size Antenna" src="http://gigaompaidcontent.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/aereo-dime-size-antenna-o.png?w=708"   class="alignright size-full wp-image-541792" /></a></p>
<p>This is remarkable but perhaps more remarkable are the plunging data and transcoding costs that meant Aereo could build the site in the first place. Kanojia says the company is buying &#8220;tens of petabytes of storage&#8221; for as low as $95 a terabyte, and that the price is dropping all the time. What this means is that when (and if) Aereo clears the legal hurdles, it can scale nearly instantly in cities and towns outside New York.</p>
<p>&#8220;The cost structure based on the cloud is a fraction of what it was,&#8221; he said, adding that companies like Aereo can plan businesses &#8220;on the anticipation of these cost curves being driven down.”</p>
<p>Kanojia credits massive R&amp;D by the giants of the tech industry with not only lowering the costs of cloud computing but also changing consumer expectations about media and TV subscriptions. He says these changes have made it possible to offer $1/day subscriptions where consumers can come and go as they wish.</p>
<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s no installers, no boxes, no lost equipment &#8230; they can come in and give it a try for $1.&#8221;</p>
<p>While Kanojia is a Steve Jobs fan, he doesn&#8217;t think the late Apple founder&#8217;s &#8220;give them one price&#8221; philosophy works for subscription services which, he says, work better with a blitz of options.</p>
<p>In the bigger picture, the Aereo founder says that &#8220;TV should be like Twitter&#8221; &#8212; available everywhere and backed in every application.</p>
<p>None of this will please the big broadcast networks whose content Aereo is rebroadcasting without permission. But Aereo-style technology now seems to be an inevitable part of the future &#8212; going back makes about as much sense as going from lightbulbs to candles.</p>
<p>Kanojia spoke at VideoSchmooze, an annual gathering of video insiders hosted by Will Richmond of <a href="http://www.videonuze.com/">VideoNuze</a>.</p><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=paidcontent.org&#038;blog=33319749&#038;post=221700&#038;subd=gigaompaidcontent&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" /><p><a href="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=847877"><img src="http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ad?iu=/1008864/PaidContent_RSS_300x250&#038;sz=300x250&#038;c=847877" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gigaom.com/2012/12/05/aereo-ceo-our-cheap-tv-wouldnt-exist-without-cloud-computing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
	
		<media:thumbnail url="http://gigaompaidcontent.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/gossip-girl-on-aereo-on-ipad-o.png?w=150" />
		<media:content url="http://gigaompaidcontent.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/gossip-girl-on-aereo-on-ipad-o.png?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Gossip Girl on Aereo on iPad</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/05dfcf765f1554b08954bb9e1ee63363?s=96&#38;d=retro&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">jeffjohnroberts</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://gigaompaidcontent.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/aereo-dime-size-antenna-o.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Aereo Dime Size Antenna</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>