Publishers Beware: Advani Ads Can Look Like You Are Endorsing Him
![]()
If you are a web publisher who uses Google AdSense to serve up ads on your websites, you might want to have a good look at the image ads from the “LK Advani For PM” campaign served up on your website by Google (NSDQ: GOOG). As in the screenshots here, these image ads can look like an endorsement from the site in the absense of the ‘Ads by Google’ tag.
Advani is the prime ministerial candidate of the Bharatiya Janata Party, which has taken big time to camapaigning online through a website, blog and heavyduty online advertising through Google AdSense, in a much talked about initiative. The strategy is believed to be inspired by US President Barack Obama’s success mobilizing support online during his campaign and the fact that some 40% of voters in the upcoming general elections are below 25 years of age. A delimitation exercise also means that urban voters, who are more likely to be netizens than their rural counterparts thanks to poor Internet penetration, will have greater representation this time.
While we were reading through Outlook‘s website last week, we stumbled upon a large banner ad at the bottom of the page, which starkly said “Advani For PM’. We brought it to the notice of Outlook publisher Maheshwar Peri that in the absense of the ‘Ads by Google’ tag or any other demarcation by the publisher, it can seem at least to some readers, that Outlook is endorsing Advani. Over the years, Outlook‘s editorial stance has been opposed to Advani’s Hindutva rhetoric, making this a possibility that the magazine, or any independent news outlet for that matter, wouldn’t want to risk. Peri agreed with us and immediately got his people to look into the matter. “We make sure that ads are separated from edit. We will ensure that it is done,” he told us. Now the magazine has decided to insert an image by the side of the ad, clearly specifying that this is an advertisement.
![]()
The fact is, Peri, or the folks at Outlook, couldn’t have seen this coming. If you are signing up for AdSense and wanted to understand how an image ad would look like, Google would show you the samples on this page, where all ad formats–text, image and video–clearly carry a line on it saying ‘Ads by Google’. If the Advani campaign signed up as an Ad Words user, they would have been shown the same page as samples of how their ads would appear.
So then how come the Advani ads don’t carry that tag? Is there a different adsense package an advertiser can use to remove the Ads by Google disclaimer? And did the Advani campaign use that?
We asked Sushil Pandit, who heads up The Hive, an advertising agency that is handling the campaign. He said it was never something that was discussed. When we asked him if he could say that the Advani camaign did not insist on removing the ‘Ads by Google’ tag from its ads, he didn’t, and asked us what we were tyring to get at. “When i’m telling you this was never a matter that we discussed, where is the question of insisting?” he asked. We also put the question to Prodyut Bora, who heads BJP’s information technology cell that handles the online campaign, and he said this has never been brought to his attention.
We asked Google when does an ad say it is by Google and when doesn’t it say that. Despite repeated attempts, we did not receive a response, though a Google spokesperson did send us a link to Google AdSense Program Policies, which has no answers to the question.
It’s possible that Google allows premium advertisers to hide the ‘Ads by Google’ tag. But if you are a publisher, you would not know it looking at the pages laying down the policies of the AdSense program. And as the case of Outlook demonstrates, you can be caught unawares.
When the seperation of editorial content and advertising in a newspaper is so sacrosanct, it shouldn’t be any different for a publication’s online edition.
While its common for large publishers to feature Ads without the Ads by Google disclaimer. Since lot of Ads are evaluated by automated systems before going live on the network I feel they have that disclaimer. For Ads with large budgets a manual review might be done to give that special status. Not debating much on that…
The political nature of this AD makes it eye catchy and we stat to think of this endorsement thing. But the fact remain that most Ads are made such that the audience of the particular site take it as a recommendation from that publisher.
Just as I type this I can see Ads from Nokia and Sony on my blog without that Ads by google disclaimer :)
Well,
GOOG does put in the Ads By Google on text ad units and compresses image banners to do it (for image ads). But flash ads are left alone by GOOG (and NO! this does not signify any evil tie up between GOOG and the BJP/LKA).
You really haven't been observing ads much if this is the first ad that you noticed (served by GOOG) which did not have the Ads By Google tag. None of the flash ads will have the tag.
I do appreciate the work you guys do – and I find your writing analytical and to the point – but this is much ado about nothing! Just hope this dosent make the Outlook cover next week.
Rajesh
just block the man's mug. which is what almost every news site has already done…
quite a non-issue.
Thanks Rajesh. I understand the point about Flash Ads. That's why i linked to another picture (of the blog) which has an image ad. Advani campaign has text, image and flash ads and except for text ads, it doesn't appear anywhere. I'm by no means suggesting there is any evil conspiracy here. Just that if news outlets (or any publishers) are told by google that there will always be a disclaimer, there should be. second, publishers must be more careful to seperate edit and ad on their online properties as well.
There are many instances when a media company is running a campaign, and on their site, they will have a banner saying something like 'save ridley turtles' (for eg), which is a cause the media company believes in and if a google ad code is served next to it, the image alongside can potentially say 'advani for pm'. that's the danger we are trying to point out.
That's just like an amateur post on anything digital, back during nikhil's days contentsutra was meant to be a barometer of digital media now all i see is just print media and occasionally u write on digital then u do on such stupid things as an Advani ad
@Sruthijith
I was just pulling your leg there.
But what I fail to understand is how is the LKA campaign different from a Nokia or a Kamasutra. If you saw a Nokia flash ad on Outlook – would you think that Outlook suggests that its users use Nokia (or KS as the case may be). Why dosent Outlook ad a tab saying that those are ads (in those cases). Why does it take an LKP/BJP to make everyone sit and take notice. We have media houses taking up Private Treaties as if its the second coming of Christ – and no one cares about it! Now cant you guys dig some dirt out on how these PT's are being misused?
GOOG has a wonderful system through which any campaign can be blocked by a publisher – so its not a matter of Peri asking his people to look into it.
And anyways – guess you would agree that this is pretty much a non issue.
Sounds like Sour Grapes :-)
I am sure you would not have written this article if it were an Ad showing Manmohan SIngh or Sonia / Rahul Gandhi !!
Good that you have deleted the first comment.
Now would you please concentrate on the Print media and leave the digital to Nikhil.
Just take it from the comments posted above that you don't understand digital.
I saw the image. It nowhere looks like that Outlook is endorsing LKA or BJP. It seems you just made an issue out of nothing.
Looks like you filed the story in a real hurry! Too many spelling mistakes too!! And seriously, leave the digital to Niks. Focus on your core competencies.. sigh!